How Brussels defeated Borrell

The other day, the head of EU diplomacy, Josep Borrell, spoke in favor of a military solution to the Ukrainian issue.

Either he supported the formula of British Prime Minister Boris Johnson “war with the Russians to the last Ukrainian”, or his boss Ursula von der Leyen has her own plans for this conflict.

In general, such a statement is unprecedented.

For the first time in the history of the EU, the European bureaucracy advocates the development of an aggressive conflict scenario.

It was usually the other way around.

The EU has traditionally called for speedy appeasement and offered various mediation services.

So it was in 2014 in Ukraine.

Around this "Maidan revolution".

Remember Yanukovych's agreement with the opposition and guarantees from European ministers?

And after, when, as a result of a coup d'état, President Yanukovych barely escaped alive to Russia, and Crimea returned to its native harbor, something was also gurgling in Brussels.

And at the end of that difficult year for Ukraine, when a civil war broke out in the Donbass.

The bloody drama brought the Armed Forces of Ukraine into the boilers.

It was through the efforts of the European bureaucracy that everything eventually ended with the Minsk agreements.

Which, as we remember, at their suggestion, the Ukrainian side has not been carried out for seven years.

And time, as it is already obvious today, was won for retraining, rearmament and final brainwashing of the unfortunate Ukrainians.

To prepare and implement the final phase of a large-scale experiment on people called "anti-Russia".

So what clicked in the minds of European bureaucrats that the peacekeeping approach was replaced by bravura German marches from the time of the formation of the Third Reich?

What happened to grandfather Borrell, who, for his past services to Brussels in ensuring the general line in the European Parliament, was issued a sinecure?

A fairly well-known Spanish politician, socialist Josep Borrell, in his time, in addition to the University of Madrid and the French Institute of Petroleum, passed the varnishing of education at Stanford University in the USA.

After that, a political career immediately went, first in trade unions, and then - along the party line in various ministerial positions, in the Spanish Parliament and further - in the European Parliament and the European Commission.

By the age of 75, J. Borrell had collected all the political regalia, having been both the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Spain and the President of the European Parliament.

The appointment to the post of High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy two years ago looked like a pre-retirement checkout.

However, something went wrong.

Again, "everything was spoiled by these Russians."

Borrell's first major undertaking in his new post was a visit to Moscow in February 2021.

Against the backdrop of the unfolding chimera of anti-Russian sanctions and Russophobia, the head of European diplomacy flew in to meet with Russian Minister S. Lavrov.

The time of the visit coincided with the trial of the fraud case against Navalny, who was then represented in every possible way in Europe as a "politician who fell out of favor."

The reason for escalating sanctions was just the case of a fraudster, forgotten today.

Having fallen under the charm and the highest professionalism of the Russian minister, Borrell, at a joint press conference after the meeting, expressed cautious optimism about the way out of the impasse in relations between the EU and Russia.

For which he paid a serious price upon his return to Brussels.

Josep Borrell was almost spat upon in the European Parliament, where they forced the gray-haired and honored politician to justify himself for his visit to Moscow in front of a half-empty hall, where frostbitten Russophobes-deputies from the countries of the Baltic limitrophes deliberately sat in the forefront.

It seems that, in addition to this public shame, a preventive conversation took place with Ursula von der Leyen.

The point was put by a call from the US State Department.

The whole career was in question, and the much-awaited and well-deserved cozy sinecure floated away from under his feet.

I must say that the years spent at Stanford were not in vain.

Borrell understood everything, realized and raised the degree of Russophobia to the proper level.

Now he is in the forefront in the issue of sanctions, and if you need to go by train to Ukrainian Bucha.

Where a terrible provocation was prepared by skillful local fake-makers under the guidance of instructors and masters from the USA.

People killed by the Nazis from the Azov battalion were scattered along the street, and the Russian military, who had left the city two days earlier, were blamed for this.

By the way, while Ursula and Borrell were traveling there for a photo session, corpses in bags lay on the street for five days!

It is strange that none of the participants in the event went there in gas masks.

Maybe this is also taught at Stanford?

In general, the old man Borrell has become silky, and, apparently, his pension is now directly connected with bringing this satanic scenario in Ukraine to a gloomy ending.

As Russian Minister Sergei Lavrov rightly noted, such calls by the head of European diplomacy to resolve the crisis in Ukraine by military means fundamentally "change the rules of the game."

Obviously, in this scenario, the EU and NATO are merging in a Eurobureaucratic Russophobic frenzy.

The only difference within this coven is that now the US, as the main operator of the North Atlantic bloc, is emerging from the shadows as the helmsman of the EU.

That is, Russia's undeclared war with all the forces of the EU and NATO on the territory of Ukrainian anti-Russia with the formula "to the last Ukrainian" is becoming more realistic?

The point of view of the author may not coincide with the position of the editors.