The collective West does not tire of proving that it does not recognize any Russian "red lines", as well as its national interests.
They even try not to admit the thought that they can exist.
The very concept of global security comes down to the postulate of the need to confront Russia.
This, among other things, refers to the issue of responsibility for what is happening in Ukraine, because the West has put itself outside the brackets in this matter, has relieved itself of all responsibility.
He allegedly only consistently helps the “freedom fighters”, who at one time did not go for cookies, but made their conscious choice ...
Now the West is doing its best to aggravate the conflict and prevent it from being resolved as soon as possible.
Poland, under the flags of wild Russophobia, has already become a transit hub for the supply of weapons and militants to Ukraine.
Togo and look, she will break the chain.
Moreover, the West is striving with all its might to demonstratively attack along the lines of NATO.
For decades, Russia has been asking Russia to honor its commitments and not expand the Cold War throwback alliance to the East.
Instead, there is constant ignorance, rudeness, and now consistent attempts to drag neutral countries such as Sweden and Finland into this barracks.
The topic of persistently inviting these countries to the alliance arose even before the Russian special operation as a form of response to our proposals for security guarantees.
The old sworn "friend" of our country, General Secretary Jens Stoltenberg, understands that it is necessary to strike while the iron is hot, and against the backdrop of a general anti-Russian outcry, there is an opportunity to drag the Scandinavian countries into the bloc.
In his annual report on the activities of the alliance, Stoltenberg said that NATO is ready to open its arms to these countries.
He spoke about a long-standing partnership, about the compliance of their armed forces with standards, so the issue of acceptance will be resolved very quickly and positively.
All you need to do is reach out your hand.
The soil is ready.
There are good reasons to believe that the chances of refusing a kind invitation are very, very few.
The logic of reasoning is as follows: the bloc-free status protected from conflicts for many decades, but now there is a fundamental change in the security structure according to NATO patterns, and therefore new approaches are needed.
Approximately so, for example, the Prime Minister of Sweden Magdalena Andersson argues, not excluding the country's possible membership in NATO.
That is, the alliance, which artificially and speculatively extended its life after the end of the bloc confrontation and existed all the last decades on its own and in search of a weighty reason for its necessity, is now being presented in an updated wrapper and presented as a new and only true word in the field of ensuring European security.
They are especially trying in the Finnish direction, because this country borders on Russia and it has long-standing good relations and ties with our country.
Therefore, they will influence, for example, through the promotion of the topic of real or imaginary territorial claims.
Soon, you see, footage with a Russian submarine in Finnish waters from the “Peculiarities of National Fishing” will be played as evidence of aggressive aspirations.
The situation is also heated up by the former Baltic republics, which do not get tired of talking about the horrors of the Soviet occupation and, under this noise, are conducting an openly repressive policy and fighting any dissent within the country.
Hysteria is necessary, because now there is a massive processing of the same Finnish society, accustomed to living in the existing beznatov security system, accustomed to good neighborliness with Russia, and it is not clear why this collar is needed, designed to cross out the former stability and normal life without the ghosts of upheavals.
With this yoke will come the virus of Russophobia, NATO military bases, which are a hybrid form of occupation.
Interestingly, biological weapons laboratories are included in the kit?
And what about the symbols and ammunition of the Third Reich?
Or was it exclusive for Nezalezhnaya?..
They will do everything to make it impossible to hear the voice of reason, and when the Finnish society comes to its senses, it will be too late: the NATO boot will begin to knead not only the earth, but also crush politics, deprive sovereignty, frightening the image of an insidious enemy.
Already now they are processing allegations that Russian propaganda will do everything to split society, bring confusion and prevent entry into the coveted bloc.
But it's not about propaganda, but about reason.
NATO does not draw conclusions from its mistakes.
From which we can conclude that these are not mistakes at all, namely that a consistent strategy for the artificial escalation of conflict situations.
This is what they live.
In the same report, Stoltenberg declared a duty to continue supplying weapons to Ukraine, and this will be done "for as long as it takes."
And they are counting on a long conflagration, which is why they pushed the Armed Forces of Ukraine to the tactics of ISIS*.
This means that, following the principle of mutual responsibility, they will force the newly converted countries to throw firewood into the conflict, making them accomplices as well.
So the former security and peaceful life in Helsinki and Stockholm will only have to be nostalgic and dream.
Even at the beginning of the 2000s, the outstanding Russian thinker Alexander Panarin (by the way, a native of Donetsk Gorlovka) wrote that NATO’s advance to the East in the future is “no less dangerous for Europe than for Russia”, because “it is a process of consolidating the Americanization of Europe.”
The scientist noted that in the long run, this significantly weakens the West, because "the flexibility and diversity of its strategies decrease."
What kind of flexibility can there be in a barracks where everything is done by command?
Still, the very existence of the alliance after 1991 is a crime.
Now this is especially clear.
It can lead to anything.
The Alliance has already destroyed the post-war security architecture in Europe and wants more blood.
It is obvious that the US and NATO are destabilizing Europe in order to ensure that they keep it under their boots.
Yes, and the goal of pumping up NATO is seen in the global struggle for power.
In the struggle to retain power.
What is happening is more and more reminiscent of the same Skynet supercomputer from the Terminator.
NATO monster with zombie traits is eager to rebuild a new wonderful world.
* "Islamic State" (ISIS, ISIL) - the organization was recognized as a terrorist organization by the decision of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of December 29, 2014.
The point of view of the author may not coincide with the position of the editors.