Ban Yue Tan commentator Qin Daixin
A "village patrol team" of unknown origin even forcibly took away a sheep in the name of "making nucleic acid for sheep" when it encountered sheep herding people.
It sounds bizarre, but it really happened in Hejian, Hebei.
This scene is jaw-dropping.
A few days ago, the Hejian City Joint Investigation Team issued an official notice on the matter, saying that the person involved drove a counterfeit police car and pretended to be a patrol officer of the police station. Take criminal coercive measures.
In this regard, many netizens still have questions, why did the party secretary and his party pretend to be the police?
The language of the notification is vague, and further investigation and explanation of the "hand-in-hand" incident is required.
More attention should be paid to the cadres' work style and grass-roots governance issues that may exist behind the "Leading the Sheep" incident.
In the "Guiding Opinions on Strengthening and Improving Rural Governance" issued by the General Office of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the General Office of the State Council, it is clearly mentioned that the mechanism of "one auxiliary police officer for one village" should be implemented.
It is reported that in some places, the implementation of the central documents is "flexible", turning auxiliary police into "police assistants", village committee cadres and even grid personnel put on police uniforms and hurriedly transform.
The punished village party secretary led people to openly imitate police cars and pretend to be police station personnel. Whether this is the case requires further investigation by relevant parties to find the crux of the problem and prescribe the right medicine.
Never because of public opinion, a matter can be punished with one piece of paper.
In addition, it is unheard of to make nucleic acids for sheep in the name of epidemic prevention and control. Is such a thing common in the local area?
!
If it is said that such cadres and such behaviors are not private and accidental acts of misconduct by individuals, but are commonplace and habitual for a long time, then there must be a big question mark for local grassroots governance.
"Leading the sheep with the hand" is not a trivial matter. Behind it is the relationship between the cadres and the masses, and the image of the party and the government.
Since the revolutionary period, our party has made "not taking a single needle from the masses" as a red line of discipline that public officials must abide by.
Today, these fine traditions have been forgotten by some people. Faced with this kind of behavior that blatantly harms the interests of the masses and the ideological style of some cadres who use their power for personal gain, the relevant departments must deal with them in a timely manner and cannot be soft-hearted.
In view of the cadres' work style and grassroots governance problems that may exist behind the incident, it is even more necessary to seriously reflect on it and make great efforts to rectify it.
It should be noted that grassroots cadres are one of the groups with the closest relationship with the masses, and they are the "key minority" in the grassroots governance system.
Only by always cherishing the masses and insisting on using power for the people can we live up to the expectations of the people and create a clean grass-roots ecology.