Bloggers visit tombs, and the results of investigation and punishment must be "visible"
Chai Chunyuan
A few days ago, a blogger on a certain platform was reported by netizens to publish information about illegal activities of "tomb exploring".
Subsequently, the reported person responded on Weibo that he was willing to respond to the question, and also said that he would go to the local police station to explain the situation.
In addition, because the blogger has repeatedly appeared in some cities in Shandong to carry out "tomb exploration" activities, the Cultural Protection Office of the Shandong Provincial Department of Culture and Tourism has also received reports from netizens from various platforms, and is currently investigating the matter (3 Observer Network News on March 12).
The chaos of live broadcasts and publications caused by traffic has been almost dizzying in recent years: some people disturb the order of disaster relief due to the live broadcast of the disaster relief process, and some people disturb the normal life of others because of watching the hometown of Olympic athletes. "Tombs" disturbed the peace of the deceased and even those suspected of disrupting the order of cultural protection also appeared.
People can’t help but ask, where is the bottom line of online traffic acquisition?
How should it be effectively regulated?
The report of the bloggers of "Tomb Exploration" may provide some new inspirations for the governance of such behaviors.
The popularity of tomb robbery novels and the popularity of archaeology are all new phenomena worthy of attention in recent years.
There is a psychological drive of curiosity, and there is also the charm of traditional culture.
If you have attention, you will have traffic. When you browse some current platforms, many people send videos to invite netizens to visit places of interest (mainly mausoleums), and some people live broadcast the process of cultural relics and archaeology, of course, including this reported "Tomb Exploring" blogger.
Whether the above behavior is legal or not is a very professional question.
If the investigation and handling results of this reported incident are used to clarify the relevant legal boundaries, it will not only regulate and remind online behaviors, but also facilitate the platform to strengthen management in a targeted manner.
As for the reported blogger, there are at least two issues that need to be clarified at present: one is whether his "tomb-visiting" behavior violates the relevant cultural relics protection and tourism regulations; Damaged results.
According to reports, the blogger has shared his trips to "tombs" many times, including the "Ming Dynasty King's Tomb in Zoucheng", "Shanxi Yangxu Tomb" and "Lu Huai King Tomb".
In these places, there are scenes of men walking down ladders and holes, and there are scenes of men sitting in tombs with flashlights, surrounded by many tomb bricks.
In this regard, a staff member of the Cultural Protection Department of the Shandong Provincial Department of Culture and Tourism said that the investigation process will take a certain amount of time, and the people involved cannot be dealt with only based on online pictures.
It should be said that this answer is prudent and responsible.
First, these behaviors involve very professional laws and regulations on cultural protection, tourism, etc., which need to be accurately found and applied; second, the specific behavior of the blogger and the actual degree of harm need to be investigated clearly, and specific problems will be analyzed in detail; Third, the whistleblower of the case claimed that the "Tomb of King Lu Huai" belongs to the municipal-level cultural relics protection unit, and netizens can enter freely, which also exposes the local loopholes in cultural relics protection.
It is reported that the reported blogger is suspected of having cancelled his account, and perhaps he has realized the inappropriate behavior of "visiting the tomb".
However, it is hoped that the handling of this matter will not "die out" due to the cancellation of the account by the party concerned.
As early as 2017, the Central Office and the State Office issued the "Opinions on Implementing the Legal Popularization Accountability System of State Organs "Whoever Enforces the Law and Popularizes the Law".
You must know that identifying problems is not only to punish illegal acts, but to clarify legal boundaries through case-by-case processing, plug management loopholes, and then promote social management and enhance citizens' awareness of law-abiding, which may have far-reaching significance.
It is expected that the results of this incident will be made and advertised as soon as possible, so that everyone can "see".
Because for ordinary people, this field is very unfamiliar and very "attractive".