"0 yuan learning" flickering when to stop
car cross
At present, the scale of my country's online audio market is steadily expanding, and more and more people are beginning to pay attention to the opportunity to record audiobooks to make money.
According to Xinhua News Agency, some businesses took the opportunity to promote various "voice training courses" on online platforms.
Most of the training courses first recruit students with promises such as "free professional voice training" and "help contact high-income part-time jobs". employment”, and some even back online loans.
0 yuan to learn dubbing can easily earn over 10,000 a month?
If there is such a good thing, the training institutions have long been crowded and crowded, so why do they need to advertise and promote?
There is no free lunch in the world. Fancy propaganda such as "low threshold, more money, quick money, and lying down" are full of routines and traps everywhere, just waiting for the "fish" to be hooked one after another.
Similar blindness is not the case.
"0 yuan to learn financial management", "0 yuan to learn editing", "0 yuan to learn writing", "0 yuan to learn to draw"... Any skills that have a certain market demand can be linked to "0 yuan learning".
In addition, the phenomenon of "secretly taking a certificate" is similar to this. Some training institutions use hype and propaganda to encourage netizens to spend money to test for qualifications such as psychological consultants, health managers, and fire engineers, but in fact, most of these certificates are not valuable.
These training courses that make money by cheating not only violate the legitimate rights and interests of consumers, but also destroy the normal order of the training market. If they are not managed and standardized, there may be a phenomenon of "bad money driving out good money".
In this regard, it is far from enough to just remind consumers of rational identification, but also to pay a heavy price for bad training institutions and their "accomplices" who trample on professional ethics and violate laws and regulations.
Similar to "0 yuan learning" training courses suspected of multiple violations of laws and regulations.
For such routines, the "Consumer Rights Protection Law", "Advertising Law", "Anti-Unfair Competition Law", "Network Security Law" and "E-commerce Law" have relevant penalty clauses.
In addition to punishing bad training institutions in accordance with laws and regulations, the online platforms involved are also to blame.
Many consumers credulously believe in business cheating, which is probably inseparable from the "endorsement" of online platforms.
Most of these training courses put exaggerated and false admissions advertisements on major online platforms, which seriously misleads consumers' judgments.
At present, the supervision of such training courses still has certain fuzzy areas, cross areas and even vacuum areas.
The supervisory powers and responsibilities of relevant departments should be clarified in accordance with the law, the effectiveness and pertinence of supervision should be improved, and the responsibilities of relevant online platforms should be tightened, so that similar "zero yuan learning" training courses have no place.
Integrity and law-abiding are the bottom line that cannot be trampled, and those who trample the bottom line should be expelled from the market.