The death of Mario Biondo, impudence in prime time

• LOC Santina and Giuseppe, parents of Mario Biondo: "We have proof that our son was murder"

The

is fashionable and

is aware. The success of the

docuseries

, the success of the broadcast two weeks ago of the documentary about

have been more than enough reasons for the group to have searched and searched until they found a new case in which All the elements are mixed -crime, suspicions, famous people, mistakes ...- and they have not been slow to find it: the death of

. Eight years of silence in

, and now, all the meat on the grill, without control, without limits, without anything.

It was this week in the

,

, where the ban was opened. From there the feedback from

did the following. The death of

in all the programs,

in all the programs, the doubts of the case, the autopsy, the photographs, the suspicions in all the programs. The problem is not dealing with a case that the Italian Justice has never closed since

died in 2013, the problem is how it is treated. And in that there would be a lot to say.

We are seeing it with cases like that of

, the role of the media. It was seen in the case of

, in

, even much closer in time. Those almost obscene treatments in which the journalists and the television seemed vultures eager for their bait. How many times have you been self-critical of those times? Many. In the documentary by

, for example, the role played by the press is clearly indicated. In the case of

is difficult to forget those interviews in

, or moments like those that were experienced, recorded and broadcast live when the bodies of the three girls were found with the entire

gathered at the Town Hall, with their parents there, with their friends there.

Even in the case of little Gabriel with details of the state in which the child's body was found, with reconstruction images ... Too much not to have learned.

A mannequin to simulate the autopsy of Mario Biondo

But nothing has been learned, absolutely nothing. The moment you have a case with all the ingredients to fall back into that morbidity, in that media 'pornography', you fall again. It is not just that the case remains the same since

died

, closed in Spain and opened in Italy, it is the intention to point to

, to place her as the number one suspect, to remove data that at the moment justice has failed to prove. And, above all and above all, it is to return to that treatment for which the mea culpa has been intoned so much.

It is taking a mannequin to the set of a program,

,

, placing it in the middle of the collaborators' table, to try to show the gaps in

autopsy

. It is taking

parents

to their first interview in these eight years on a Spanish television program and announcing that they were bringing evidence, when in reality not only did they not show any evidence but the whole intention of that interview seemed to be to point out and mark one person again:

. It is to end that interview with a tearful video of images of

as a child, with his sister, with his mother, with his father, which caused what he hoped would happen, the cry of a father in prime time. It is trying to validate and justify removing this case on a television that had always been silent, bringing authorities on the matter, researchers, experts, experts, and at the same time mixing their opinions with the morbid, the spectacle and the show. It is going back to the old days, it is falling into the same mistakes as always.

Obscene, could well be the word that describes it. Nobody says that the case should not be discussed, that special programs are not prepared in which they try to show why the Spanish Justice took 47 days to close the case, calling it suicide and why the Italian Justice keeps it open thanks in large part to the struggle of parents who believe without a shadow of a doubt that their son was murdered. The problem is how you return the

case

to the front line of the media. Yes, of course the

It is fashionable, of course documentaries are made about crimes and cases that are still closed and still have many open wounds, but you cannot compare the treatment of these documentaries, the preparation, the work, the care, the professionalism, with what is being done. watching these days in

.

What is behind Mediaset's interest in the Mario Biondo case?

Why has

never echoed the

case

to date? First, because when

died,

was one of the faces of

. Second, because at that time

about crimes, docuseries, etc. It did not interest him too much and thirdly, because while in Spain the case was closed, in Italy the group was already in charge of making the most of it. In fact, last night during the interview with

parents,

images of

mother were shown

during some of his interviews on Italian television replicating the death of his son, hanging himself by a handkerchief on a shelf to show that the position in which his son was found was not plausible. Yes, there the treatment of

death

has been terrible. We always copy the best. Do you really need to see how

?

It was in a special edition of the program

on the Italian channel Italia 1, owned by

, where he began to fall into the worst of holes. In fact, Raquel Sánchez Silva sued the family of

considering that during that program the idea was spread that the death of

had not been a suicide and in which

was pointed out

as a suspect in her death. The same thing that has been done throughout this week. The same intention, the same result. Nothing has been clarified, there is nothing new and again all the fingers pointing towards the same place, towards her. Why? A question of audience to see if

recovers the leadership against Antena 3? Or is it that there are other interests behind it and how much interest the

case can generate is being measured

?

"We have proof that our son was murdered,"

,

parents

, declared last night during the interview on

. Indeed, no one can deny that the case of the death of

is full of gaps, very strange things, suspicions and indications that lead to think that the suicide does not fit the way they wanted to make it fit. Parents cling to that, but where is the evidence? The Palermo Prosecutor's Office, in charge of the case in Italy, recently was about to close the case, but

parents

managed to present a series of evidence that the Prosecutor's Office kept it open in the absence of the judge investigating this new documentation.

In it are the data of the two people who were with

the night of his death. No one has released those names. Not even last night when the parents and journalists who were experts in the case were asked, did they mean anything. In addition, along with these two names, the complaint to the coroner

has been included

when he discovered that certain of the remains found in the body of

did not belong to him. Those are apparently the family's tests to ensure that

was murdered, the problem is not the tests, far from it, the problem is that deep down what is intended is to point out, point out and if

may fall

.

Last night, one of the journalists present at the interview said that there were two events in the

case

. On the one hand, that the errors and the evidence show that it was not a suicide and, on the other hand, everything around the case, and that in neither of the two events is Raquel Sánchez Silva more than the widow of

. If that were the case with

he would not have jumped onto Mediaset's television sets; If this were the case last night, one of the first questions and practically the entire interview with

parents

would have revolved around what

think

What was his daughter's wife, what if they think she is hiding something, what if they consider her to be suspicious and when did the perception that

mother

had of

changed

.

The gaps in the investigation into the death of Mario Biondo

It was not a prepared interview, Mario Patiño herself said it before starting, that she knew little about this case, it was an interview to continue inflating a case that is still not very clear why

has such a need to squeeze now until the last consequences . To expose

? To once again question the reason why within weeks of dying her husband was going to Ibiza with some friends? So that doubts fall back on her? So that the mother can vent her anger and remember that it was

who stained her son's good name?

,

,

, all the time

. If the reality were that Spain wants to clarify all the gaps that were left unfilled during the Spanish investigation into the death of

,

would not be the center around which everything would revolve,

would be a collateral element of an unfortunate death.

Because the reality is not that you want to put on the table a more than dubious investigation, the reality is that you want to be able to carry a mannequin simulating the autopsy of

;

the reality is that you want to take the parents to see how the mother loses her nerves and the father breaks from the pain;

the reality is not to clear doubts, the reality is that there are still more doubts;

the reality is to fall into what has been said so many times 'it will not be done again', because there will always be someone who will fall again.

According to the criteria of The Trust Project

Know more

• Telecinco

Luca Onestini, saved from the expulsion Secret Story, to the limit;

even Carlos Sobera loses his papers

Josué, Zoe and Diriany, first trio Sandra Barneda knocks out The Island of Temptations 4

Cinthia, Sandra and Julen, nominated Secret Story |

Adara, expelled in an unheard of Telecinco strategy

See links of interest

• Last News

• 2022 business calendar

• Home THE WORLD today

• Check Christmas Lottery

• Holidays 2021

• How to do

• West Ham United - Chelsea

• Seville - Villarreal

• Milan - Salernitana

• 1. FSV Mainz 05 - VfL Wolfsburg

• Bayer 04 Leverkusen - SpVgg Greuther Fürth