Take off the colored glasses to see "first degree"

　　Half a month to talk about commentator Liang Jianqiang

　　Some units use the "first degree" as the primary threshold when recruiting; some companies use the "first degree" to classify "priority levels" when recruiting, and some even explicitly propose that "undergraduate non- '985" 211' college graduates do not Recruitment... is another year's recruitment season, and the discussion on the "first degree" once became a hot topic and attracted public attention.

　　Nowadays, the "first degree" referred to in recruitment often refers to the first degree obtained at the stage of higher education.

Regarding the "first degree", whether it is part-time or full-time, junior college or undergraduate, ordinary colleges or universities, or "985" or "211" schools, has become a direct evaluation criterion for some recruitment units.

　　When these have become "hard requirements", no matter whether the job seeker has chosen "college to undergraduate" after obtaining the "first degree", whether he has studied for a master's or doctoral degree, and whether he or she is admitted to a prestigious school, it becomes insignificant in the selection process. Consider factors.

As a result, "academic prejudice" derives "academic discrimination", and a large number of job seekers succumb to the resume screening stage, missing the opportunity to further prove their personal abilities.

　　Some recruiters put too much emphasis on the academic qualifications obtained at the beginning of higher education, which not only brought about "academic bias", but also exacerbated the "prestigious school complex" of students.

When individuals make a lot of efforts in the future and it is still difficult to offset the impact of the "first degree", what has given birth to more people is the stereotype of the "one exam for life" of the college entrance examination, and the increase is the worry about choosing vocational education and ordinary colleges and universities. What is intensified is the trend of involution of education.

In order to obtain a more ideal "first degree", phenomena such as "high scores repeating as a prestigious school", "higher vocational colleges being questioned" and other phenomena have emerged one after another.

　　Around the controversy over the "first degree", the education department has given an authoritative response.

Some netizens asked the Ministry of Education: "May I ask whether the first degree after graduating from college to undergraduate (non-adult higher enrollment) is a junior college or an undergraduate?" The concept of “first degree” is not used in the relevant policies and documents of the national education administration department.

What we call "academic qualifications" in the management process usually refers to the highest or final academic qualifications obtained by an individual.

　　The attitude of the authorities is clear, that is, in the formal academic system, there is no such thing as a "first academic qualification".

The reason why the "first degree" has become a problem is mainly because some recruitment units set special screening thresholds artificially in order to reduce the cost of identifying people when facing a large number of job applicants.

There is no doubt that this kind of "degree discrimination" needs to be discarded, and the threshold of "first degree" should not be set in the recruitment conditions.

In this regard, party and government departments, state-owned enterprises and institutions must play a leading role in recruitment.

　　Life is not a sprint, but a long-distance marathon. The process of studying is just one experience after another in life.

Academic qualifications are nothing but phased gains in each stage of the learning journey, and can only be used as one of the evaluation references for a specific stage.

The purpose of learning, the key is to continuously improve the overall quality of the individual, and continuously improve the ability to solve problems and solve difficult problems.

Just as we cannot use the speed of the first check-in point in the marathon to determine the ownership of the final champion, the evaluation of a person's learning gains and personal abilities must also break the "first education theory".

After all, everyone should be recognized and respected for their hard work and effort at different stages of learning.

　　At the same time, it should be noted that the obsession of some recruitment units for the "first degree" has its soil, and it is difficult to get rid of it overnight.

Those who are trapped in the "first degree" need not be too entangled in this, let alone self-limiting and self-giving up.

The "first degree" may be a "stepping stone", but it doesn't matter how the follow-up development is.

If you only have academic qualifications and no ability, you will eventually be eliminated in the competition, so you might as well look down on the "first academic qualification". It is more important to continuously improve yourself in work and education.

And the "first degree" is a prestigious school, and you should not be complacent about it and stop moving forward, otherwise, even if the starting point is enviable, it may not be the final interpretation of a colorful life.

　　In short, a certificate should not be the cause of discrimination; personal ability is never equated with the "first degree".

The whole society must take off the colored glasses and treat the "first degree" rationally.