Down and Out trouble started. The States reported that they issued the first gender-neutral passport. In it, gender is indicated by an "X". The event was announced by the spokesman for the State Department, Ned Price, who noted that this "option" is being brought to mind and from next year it will begin to be stamped in the passports of all applicants. It is well known that without a piece of paper you are an insect.

It is noted that the happy owner of the “X” mark in the “gender” column achieved this by walking for six years through torture and courts.

He went a long way, overcoming prejudices, misunderstandings and aggression of the traditionalist environment.

Through hardships to the stars, so to speak.

Without a doubt, the name of the pioneer will be carved into the granite of the calendar of the newest liberal ideology of reformatting the world and human nature in the spirit of Dr. Frankenstein.

It will be put on the same level, for example, with the conquerors of space, and the event itself will be correlated with the landing on the moon.

The Guardian already presents the situation in such a way that such passports are issued to reflect “living reality”.

This passport stamp is referred to as "a milestone in the recognition of human rights."

The event is called historical and festive.

“Here they are, X's people.“ New norms ”as they are.

Monstrous metamorphoses, which are imposed on us under the guise of freedom of choice, "- commented on the news the spokesman for the Russian Foreign Ministry Maria Zakharova.

Photo editors have such standard options when you can age a person's photo or, conversely, rejuvenate, change gender.

Cool, no more.

But when in reality they try to implement this "option", and mercilessly advertising and promoting, imposing a pip on the language of any opponents, instilling and educating from childhood, then just a feeling of monstrosity arises.

Freedom of choice in such a situation is also highly questionable.

Do they break a person through the knee, excuse me, through gender?

It is banal, but by advertising such an "option" from a young age, a person is simply traumatized, reforged and modified worse than comprachikos, they create a lot of potential conflicts, not only internal, but also social, global ones. Something suggests that all this implanted twist is necessary for something else. We are not talking about freedom and rights, but about a new level of enslavement and lawlessness. Or about the modernized wrapper of the old and tested for centuries ...

The current democracy, elevated to the standard of the universal "philosopher's stone", which is a slave ship that carries people to the promised shores of the future. They just take away their freedom, and instead endow them with an "X" mark, which is the brand on their foreheads. Next will go shackles and a collar around the neck. Everything is as it should be. The slave market may be like that. The future members of the new society are carefully prepared for it, seduced, then they achieve obedience, complete dependence, produce a kind of castration, eliminating sexual characteristics. And no one has canceled the problem of overpopulation, which is why such "humane" methods of curbing it.

Something prompts that all this is being done in order to tie people up, to make the modern versions of democracy inviolable for them, which will be perceived as the only protection and support, without which a person will be completely helpless and can be torn apart by the savagery and aggression of the dark undemocratic masses.

Therefore, the mark "X" creates the illusion of the triumph of rights and their protection.

In reality, a person becomes a hostage of this "option", which lays the fear growing in him.

Actually, we are talking about the mechanisms of the spread of fear, which fetters people with one chain.

Will make them with all passion and trepidation worship the pillars and idols of democratic truths, arrange sacrifices in front of them and carry out any will that specially trained priests let them down.

Will make you become property.

These are the most obvious consequences of this entire global factory of constructing or castrating people.

Death factories in the next generations, and now - a stamping conveyor: while the necessary manipulations are performed, the object enjoys sweet mirage, similar to the singing of sirens.

Let us see what will become of these "rights" when they have already been finally implanted and stamped.

How will a potential "monster" manifest itself?

How will those accustomed to seeing themselves as special, unique, rising above all other ordinary ones, divided into traditional “M” and “F”, continue to evolve?

How will these “X-men” begin to apply and realize their “superpowers”?

At what point will dictatorial habits manifest themselves?

Will an insurmountable conflict arise between these faithful sons, or rather, the X's of democracy, this reference picture of super-beings with ordinary and trivial products of the dark human past?

Which of them is the first worthy to enter this worldly kingdom of the beautiful future, how close will its gates be, and what are the criteria for passing?

These are the questions that darken the soul and chill the heart.

Precisely what is chilling with perspectives.

However, Hollywood dreams have long represented their entire fan.

For "X-men" too.

After all, ordinary people threaten them all the time.

You have to defend yourself, show your claws ...

“Each of us is human, that's what matters,” President Vladimir Putin noted in his recent Valdai speech after quoting Martin Luther King.

The problem is that while talking about the protection of rights, a system of separation is being introduced, which operates according to racial, national, and gender principles.

She emphasizes obvious or artificial differences, and the unifying, human is muffled, forgotten or declared insignificant.

Dissociation is arranged through substitutions.

Thus, the theme of combating racism turns into "reverse discrimination".

The conversation about the rights of men and women takes on the features of a phantasmagoria.

Parents are numbered, children are processed.

At the same time, the Russian president in his speech also said about “simply monstrous things”: “Today, children are taught from an early age that a boy can easily become a girl and vice versa, in fact, they are actually imposing a choice that is supposedly available to everyone.

They impose, removing parents from this, forcing the child to make decisions that can break his life.

And no one even consults with child psychologists: in general, is a child at some age able to make a decision of this kind or not?

Calling a spade a spade, it is already on the verge of a crime against humanity, and everything is under the name and under the banner of progress. "

It's like that.

Seducing with conversations about a choice, imposing it, the child is simply removed from living life and immersed in an experimental, artificial, hybrid reality, and the very imposed, suggested, is given out for progress.

Are we talking about people or cyborgs from Hollywood films, modified products of the ideological industry? Will not all this lead to people simply losing themselves, forgetting who they really are? And we will get not progress at all, but a monstrous degradation, leveling of a person under the format of dullness "X". All this is very similar to cloning, which is still being imposed on the ideological plane, rigidly formatting minds. Or is "X" a void, a gutted person? A person without qualities who are lured away by the illusion of a wide range of choices, where he can easily get lost.

“Well, someone likes it - let him do it,” Vladimir Putin summed up in the same Valdai speech, proposing “the ideology of healthy conservatism”.

Its main goal is to save a person, including from such experiences and from the prospects of the monstrous.

Preserving his authenticity.

And this is a very big problem and responsibility at the present time.

We are talking not only about the “fragility of the reality around us”, but also about the fragility of the person himself.

Just like states lose their sovereignty in exchange for X-status, a person can lose sovereign, human, become a toy in the hands of the architects of the new world of the future.

The point of view of the author may not coincide with the position of the editorial board.