"Internally pushing" resumes into famous companies, is it a guide or a routine?

  Kong Deqi

  "Internet, telecommunications, finance and other companies recruiting schools and agencies to recruit "internal push", direct to the team, one step in place" "domestic "big factory", the position has everything, "internal push" resume 100% follow-up and reply"...It is right now During the peak recruitment season for "Golden Nine and Silver Ten", many recruitment information that claimed to be able to "internally push" resumes into famous companies have spread "viral" in the circle of friends of fresh graduates.

In fact, this is a business scam that job search agencies use the asymmetry of recruitment information to start a paid "introduction" business.

(September 20th "Worker's Daily")

  Internal recommendation, also known as employee internal recommendation, is a recruitment channel for companies to encourage current employees to recommend excellent reserve talents. It is favored by employers because it is more efficient, time-saving, labor-saving, and cost-saving, and interpersonal relationship guarantees.

However, in recent years, under the guise of "introduction", many organizations claim that they will improve their resumes, provide career counseling and teach interview skills for free. In fact, they first recruit groups for free, and then guide the paid "harvest". After the students are "on the bait", Exaggerate the difficulty of job hunting, create anxiety, and propose solutions such as employment guidance courses, training and "introduction", and direct promotion in one step. The fees range from thousands to tens of thousands of yuan.

  In fact, the recruitment of enterprises involves many departments and levels. It is obviously not realistic to buy the handling staff of the whole process.

The act of selling "introduction" positions is a bottom line that companies cannot touch. Once discovered, employees may be permanently fired.

Therefore, the so-called "internal response" of intermediary agencies is mostly false.

Even if there is an exchange of interests, there is no “secret” contact that cannot be put on the table, and it is difficult to guarantee that job applicants can be officially retained.

  A wolf in sheep's clothing is still a wolf after all.

Although the illegal method of paying for "introduction" is relatively concealed, in essence, this behavior of "using fictional facts or concealing the truth to defraud a large amount of public and private property" is in line with the criminal constitution of fraud.

However, "internal push" transactions are conducted privately between institutions and internal employees, and it is difficult to obtain evidence against violations, making it impossible for job applicants to appeal after being defrauded, and the chaos of paid "inward pushing" has become worse.

  Why do job seekers become the "prey" of criminals?

It is true that their desire for work in famous companies, coupled with their lack of experience in identifying traps, are part of the reason why such paid "introduction" has repeatedly succeeded.

But its root is still in the asymmetry of recruitment information.

In reality, many internship recruitments are self-recruitment by business departments, and there is more room for operation.

For job seekers, it is more difficult for them to obtain such recruitment information, so they are willing to spend a lot of money to buy "mysterious" "introduction" opportunities.

This has also allowed some intermediaries to smell the business opportunities and start the gray business of paying "introduction".

  We can't be too demanding of undergraduates who have not been involved in the world, and they will always have a strong immune system in the face of new and varied job-hunting scams.

The existence of the “introduction” trap for payment also reflects that the current employment guidance in colleges and universities is not yet in place. The latter has not done enough to remind graduates to keep their eyes open, be vigilant, and prevent false recruitment, arbitrary fees, deduction of certificates, training loans, etc. The trap of job hunting and the obligation to report relevant situations to the Human Resources and Social Security Department have caused college students to be bewildered by intermediaries that are difficult to distinguish between true and false.

  In the face of the wanton rampant “introduction” of payment that infringes upon the legitimate rights and interests of college student job seekers, it is necessary for the government, schools, and enterprises to strengthen coordination, improve the employment service system, provide targeted employment guidance, strictly regulate and rectify the labor intermediary market, and reduce graduation The job search cost and the risk of being deceived by graduates will improve graduates’ job search literacy and their ability to judge illegal fraud.

At the same time, enterprises should also take the responsibility to actively discover and expose those intermediaries that hold their own flags and slander, seriously deal with "inward push" transactions, and safeguard the interests of job seekers and fair employment.