Again the dualism of our world is encroached upon by the manifolds.
Harvard University professor Carol Hoeven unabashedly declared on the air of the conservative Fox television channel that sexual diversity in humans is reduced to only two sexes: male and female.
Because a man is either a woman (has a set of eggs) or a man (produces sperm).
And there is no other sex and cannot be, for this is the nature of things.
Alas, not only respectable Republicans watch the Fox TV channel.
But also everyone else.
The professors were convicted.
Read on next, as I personally have read this several times with increasing relish (sorry): “Director of Diversity and Inclusion”.
Do you understand?
Director of Diversity and Inclusion!
No, you don't understand!
The Director of Diversity and Inclusion at Harvard University (!!!) condemned such a statement by the professor.
She called him harmful and transphobic.
She also pointed out that "not only women can be pregnant, but also transsexual men, as well as intersex and gender non-conforming people."
And we certainly have nothing against all these trans and intersex men, whoever they are.
Each hut has its own rattles.
But in order to be pregnant, we still need an egg fertilized by a sperm.
First and second.
And nothing else.
That's all the variety.
And another girl, “a five-year-old PhD candidate, black Jewish biological anthropologist” (as written on her Twitter), wrote this: “It is very important to teach medical students a gender-sensitive language, as they will certainly interact with people who identify themselves outside the gender binary system. "
And how to explain to this girl that self-identification is somewhat different from identification.
I know a couple of places in Moscow where elves gather on weekends.
This is self-identification.
And after the weekend, the elves go to their jobs to balance balances and sell televisions.
And that's identification.
And no matter how you identify yourself, if you have ovaries with eggs inside and a uterus, then you are a woman.
And if you can produce sperm, then you are a man.
This is identification.
And you can't argue against her.
No, you can, of course, remove for yourself all these rudiments that are unnecessary in a society of victorious diversity.
Then yes.
I won't say a word.
But first you need to delete it.
However, there are still people who have signs of both sexes.
But this is very rare.
And we will assume that such people are really lucky.
They can choose.
True, for some reason, for the most part, instead of choosing, they go to work in the industry of adult films.
By the way, for the sake of curiosity, I went to the Harvard University website to check out the Diversity, Inclusion and Affiliation Directorate.
There are 26 people there.
Do you know how many of them are white?
Six.
So much for all the diversity.
Or take the recent history of chess.
Scientists from some other universities suggested changing the rules of the game in order to neutralize the advantages of the first move.
Because, according to statistics, those who make the first move win more often than those who got black.
Well, you understand.
It was suggested that after White's first move, Black could make two moves in a row.
And for greater justice (you cannot always offend these White) it is better this way: White's first move, then two moves in a row with Black, then again two moves with White.
And then as usual.
Let's not say that this cancels the entire existing chess theory.
After all, chess no longer exists.
They are killed by a computer.
But no matter what rules you come up with for the second and third moves, the first move will still not go anywhere.
And if he is made white, it will be black discrimination.
If it becomes black, it will discriminate against whites.
And even if everything is repainted in rainbow colors, then nothing will change.
First there will be the first move.
And then all the rest.
Because you can't make the game start from both sides at the same time.
Here, again, all the diversity.
And here's what's interesting: after all, all these manifolds are extremely motivated.
Passionate.
And they will win.
The developer almost always defeats the reluctant locals because he has millions at stake.
The multiples will win because they have rattles at stake.
And we will continue to mock these people with stony faces and icy eyes.
And any victory should be expressed in something.
In the transition of territories, in the change of meanings, in the abolition of something.
How will the victory of the polyimages be expressed?
After all, whatever one may say, but there will still be only two floors.
And they will still be determined only by which sex (that is, intended for reproduction) cells will be produced by this or that person.
Personally, I see no way out of this vicious circle.
Except for one thing: to make sure that the wonderful person of the future does not produce any germ cells at all.
And this is already easy to achieve quickly.
There will still remain, however, the chromosome set ...
Well, this is already at the next stage of improvement.
If, of course, it comes after the rejection of the germ cells.
The point of view of the author may not coincide with the position of the editorial board.