On April 21, the "28-year wrongful life change case" reoccurred. The Kaifeng police in Henan reported that Xu Min, the party involved in the case, sued Guo Xikuan, Du Xinzhi and his wife for criminal offences. The police did not open the case after collecting evidence based on multiple investigations.
Henan University also publicly responded to questions about baby identification and baby care. At the same time, it admitted that Du Xinzhi's medical records had hospitalization numbers, incorrect bed numbers, no records of the first course of illness, and missing hepatitis B surface antigen test sheets.
At noon on April 21, Xu Min, the adoptive mother of Yao Ce who "wrongly changed my life for 28 years," said on Weibo that "there are still several key links with no answers" and listed 11 questions in the article, indicating that the truth is unclear and decided Not give up.
On April 22, he claimed that he is currently in debt and has no place to live, and he has sued Yao Ce's wife for real estate in Jiujiang, causing heated discussions.
Adoptive mother Xu Min: Continue to investigate the truth, and take back his own house
Regarding the accusation of Guo Xikuan, Du Xinzhi and his wife for criminal offences, the Kaifeng police did not open the case after multiple investigations and evidence collection. The adoptive mother Xu Min said that the truth of the result was unclear and would never give up.
She believes that there are still many doubts about the matter. For example, two children were not born on the same day and in the same place. Why did they hold the wrong place?
And when I went to investigate later, why all the information of my own son was changed, etc. I only hope that the relevant departments can help me find the truth, seek an explanation, and get out of my pain.
Xu Min expressed surprise at how things had evolved to such an extent, saying that after Yao Ce met his biological parents, his husband and wife were still in charge of Yao Ce's affairs, "as long as we can do everything we can."
She said that she thought she was going to have two sons and was very happy, but she suffered "torture of fate". As an ordinary mother, she really suffered too much. Tragedy, but also suffer the pain of being separated from flesh and blood.
"My biological son Guo Wei doesn't have any real estate in Henan, and he is scolded by the husband and wife every day, so he can't work and live normally."
Xu Min said that because Yao Ce was in poor health since he was a child, he almost grew up under the spoiling of the couple, so he developed Yao Ce's more willful character. At that time, Yao Ce got married with a lot of temperament, and they couldn't agree to it. Yes, even later, at Yao Ce's request, he and her husband moved outside to live, giving the house they had bought by themselves to Yao Ce and his wife and their parents.
Later, Yao Ce became seriously ill. Talking about the house issue, he agreed to return the house to Xu Min and his wife, even preparing to transfer the house. As a result, he suddenly passed away and the matter was stranded here.
Xu Min said that Yao Ce’s medical treatment has almost spent all their savings and no place to live. Yao Ce’s wife’s parents still have a house next to their home and rent it out. "Since you have a house, a car (marriage and dowry), we don’t Yes, but the house that belongs to us has to be returned."
"I can't fall down because I still have a lot to do," Xu Min said.
Wife, Ms. Xiong: Respect Yao Ce's final wishes and look forward to good communication
"This matter can be discussed." Regarding the case of her adoptive mother Xu Min suing herself for Jiujiang real estate, Ms. Xiong said that because Yao Ce used to communicate with Xu's mother, she did not participate, and she never said that she would not return the house. However, if the communication is not good, it can only be resolved by law.
She believes that the biggest obstacle to the house problem is that the two parties are not calm and distrustful. The parents of both parties should talk about it, instead of sandwiching themselves as children to discuss this matter, because the parents of this house have also paid a lot. , Including decoration, furniture and other costs, not all at once.
Seeing things turn into this, Ms. Xiong believed that it had something to do with public opinion. She vowed that she did not have a trumpet and expressed her sadness, "In fact, there is no big conflict between us and Ms. Xu, and we can get along with each other normally."
She also said that she understood that Xu's mother wanted to make up for her own son Guo Wei, and she was afraid that the old would have nothing to do with her, but she hoped that they would also understand their feelings of such a great change suddenly.
Regarding the future courts, Ms. Xiong said: "The lawsuit is definitely going to be fought, just to fight for a breath." She also said that she still gave the real estate to (Yao Ce's) grandma according to Yao Ce's original wishes, and hoped that the Internet would no longer be available. If there is violence, give yourself and your children a quiet life.
Legal expert: The police’s refusal to open a case is in compliance with the regulations, and the key is to clarify whether “wrong exchange” or “intentional exchange”
"First of all, we must pay attention to two issues: first, was it a wrong change or a deliberate change? Second, the time limit for prosecution is limited."
In response to Xu Min’s charges against Guo Xikuan, Du Xinzhi and his wife for criminal offences, Ruan Qilin, a criminal law expert at China University of Political Science and Law, told the reporter of “News Have Opinions” that if it is deliberately exchanged, it involves the crime of child abduction in the criminal law.
In addition, according to the Criminal Law, the statutory maximum penalty for prosecution is less than 5 years, and the period of prosecution is 10 years. This case has far exceeded the time limit for prosecution. Therefore, he believes that "the police's refusal to file a case is in compliance with the law."
"Adoptive parents have the right to make such a claim. In fact, there is still a certain basis." Wu Shenkuo, executive director of the International Center for Internet Rule of Law of Beijing Normal University, pointed out that whether the police file a case is the judgment of the judiciary, and the most important thing is that the person concerned Relief measures taken by the police after making such a decision.
He suggested that: afterwards, the party concerned can file a complaint with the public security organ for reconsideration. If it is not approved, then it can file a request with the prosecution organ.
If the procuratorial organ thinks that there is a reason, he can request the public security organ to explain the reasons for not filing the case. If the procuratorial organ does not recognize the public security organ’s reasons, he will force the public security organ to file the case; on the other hand, if the party concerned is dissatisfied with the result of the procuratorial organ, he can Proceed directly to the court, and the court will make further judgment.
Internet communication expert Tian Li: To create a "human blood steamed bun" that is the same as getting traffic from rivals, we need "more tolerance and empathy"
"The act of not treating other people's pain as pain reminds me of a word-human blood steamed buns. The topical nature of the incident and the fact that the respective media earns traffic for economic benefits are the reasons why this tragedy cannot be concluded", Peking University Tian Li, director of the Internet Research Center, believes that the case has value as a public issue due to its particularity, but the matter has returned to the ethical and legal level at this stage and should be discussed in the private domain.
Regarding the strange phenomenon that bystanders "empathize" in this case, but both parties did not feel it, Tian Li gave her own answer: the so-called "empathy" is actually just an illusion, except for every incident. People of all regard what they saw as the truth, and only the parties involved in the event saw the whole event.
The two parties in the case have contradictions and family relationships. However, because some of the remarks deliberately create opposition to gain attention, the contradictory aspect of the incident is magnified, creating such a situation in which both parties are harmed.
Tian Li said that in the Internet age, it seems that everyone is only responsible for their own words, not for the effects or consequences of their own words. Therefore, she suggested that interpersonal communication stresses boundaries. As netizens in the information age, you should cherish your right to speak. At the same time, we must also consider the consequences of speaking, "require more tolerance and empathy."
Producer丨Guo Jing
Reporter 丨 Yang Chang
Editor丨Liu Hongwei and Zhang Yi