Television Rocío Carrasco and the denial of the missing money
LOC Olivia Project, that's how the filming of Rocío Carrasco's docuseries was baptized
Parental alienation The other 'Rociítos': when those who manipulate their children are men
"That's where the seed of evil began" was the phrase that
Rocío Carrasco
used
last night in
Rocío's
chapter 6
, telling the truth to stay alive
to describe the moment, the beginning of what the collaborators present on the set last night described as "torture systematic "suffered for years not only by
Rocío Carrasco
but also by two children who became the victims and the tools of a grim war that even today, and after everything that
Rocío Carrasco
has told
, is difficult to assimilate.
Rocío Flores
, who was only 5 years old at that time, and
David
, the youngest son of
Rocío Carrasco
and
Antonio David Flores
, they went through, according to their mother's story, a real ordeal of which we are now aware.
An ordeal that includes psychological reports, broken arms, night terrors, manipulations, media exposure and fear, a lot of fear, the same fear in which, although many do not understand,
Rocío Carrasco
was plunged
.
No, the children, no, please.
Telecinco broadcast last night a single chapter of the documentary
Rocío, tell the truth to stay alive
, which it divided into two parts.
Between the two chapters, as has been the case in each broadcast of the docuserie, the collaborators, invited on set, express their feelings about what was seen, hit each other on the chest or try to shed some light on the shocking words of
Rocío Carrasco
( if you can).
Last night among those collaborators was the journalist
Samantha Villar
, a voice completely removed from the world of the heart, as she herself said, but who gave where it could hurt those who accompanied her most: the terrible role that the media and journalists played in the that
Rocío Carrasco
recounted last night
.
Samantha Villar
was so clear that it even caused
Carlota Corredera to
have to cut her presentation before the shame that
Samantha Villar
put on the table and that has been criticized so much since the first chapter of
Rocío
was issued
, telling the truth to stay alive
.
"That a father comes out publicly discrediting the mother of his children is always going to harm the children, and
When the media picks up on this, I think that some institution should intervene to protect the minor.
The media play it, it does not pass them in front of them ", was the harsh and necessary criticism of
Samantha Villar
after seeing the first part of chapter 6 in which
Rocío Carrasco
not only tells the beginning of that
" seed of evil "
, but also remains The despicable role played by some media in that whole circus is very present. Because if something was clear in last night's broadcast, it is that there are two clear victims:
Rocío Flores
and
David Flores
. You cannot put a but, not a single one. to what he said
Samanta Villar
because he said
Samanta Villar
is what takes criticizing weeks. And it
was at the insistence of
Samanta Villar
to what
Carlota Corredera
could not help but
react. the hostess cut politely to the guest for the intertwined manner to try to divert the focus from the deserved reproaches of the journalist.
"Things I see, hear and read hurts and causes discomfort. Because when a person like
Rocío Carrasco
stands in front of the cameras to undress as she is undressing and to remain totally vulnerable as she is staying forever talking about all her miseries, his pains, his dramas, everything, I think the least he deserves is
that
we
all
remove our prejudices
.
Then we will criticize it or not when it finishes telling its story, we will buy it or not buy it, but we are continually looking for answers to things that it has not yet told.
We are going to continue listening to it, because if in 20 years we have not questioned Antonio David, we have to make ourselves look at him, "said
Carlota Corredera.
Were prejudices removed when covers and covers, sets and sets, speakers and speakers were given to
Antonio? David Flores
?
The "marionettes" of Antonio David Flores
Because indeed a lot is questioning the testimony of
Rocío Carrasco
, but in part, questioning it responds to what media such as Telecinco and many journalists have done for 20 years.
"Puppets" was the word that Rocío Carrasco used to refer to all those -
Massiel
,
Kiko
and
Coto Matamoros
,
Lydia Lozano
, etc. - who endorsed, defended and participated in the strategy of Antonio David Flores.
A strategy that went through belittling, discrediting and sinking the mother of her children, but which also happened, according to Rocío Carrasco, because of the greatest pain that can be inflicted on a mother, for tearing her children little by little, day by day .
For 20 years a single party has been given a voice and believed.
Without a single test, without anything to show how much he was dropping around the sets and every time a mic was plugged in.
For 20 years the image of a
Rocío Carrasco
has been given
that as a rule fell badly and if she did not do it they would already take care of it.
Now we hit each other on the chest, especially when what was seen and heard last night directly exposes and sentences two children.
Two kids!
In the first part of the chapter entitled
Who do you believe
,
Rocío Carrasco
spoke of that "seed of evil", of the "impious father" -
Antonio David Flores
-, of the person, of the parent who germinated the hatred and rejection that today for today
Rocío Flores
and, to a lesser extent due to their circumstances,
David Flores
, feel for their mother.
A hatred that did not arise overnight but grew like a small seed, the "seed of evil", which, according to
Rocío Carrasco's
testimony
,
Antonio David Flores
was feeding with lies, with manipulations, with deformations, with distortions that he was implementing in his children, especially in
Rocío Flores
, day after day, year after year, for 20 years.
Likewise, after the testimony of
Rocío Carrasco
last night
, it can be understood what has led
Rocío Carrasco
today to have no relationship with her children, that today her daughter defends her father tooth and nail and it is difficult to understand , that today
Rocío Carrasco
has given up trying to recover some children she lost while she was alive the day she decided to end a marriage that was going to become even more torture.
That phrase by
Antonio David Flores
the day
Rocío Carrasco
told him that she wanted to separate, that
"you're going to shit, Rociíto!"
, was fulfilled even far beyond what
Rocío Carrasco
could think.
Experts, such as the psychologist Sonia Cervantes present last night on the program, call it
"vicarious violence
.
"
It is a type of indirect violence that is perpetrated against someone who is not really against whom you want to inflict harm and pain, it is violence that harms children to harm the mother or father, it is violence that converts the most defenseless in the worst victims, it is the cruelty and vileness taken to the extreme, it is the violence that
Rocío Carrasco
recounted last night not only with a coherent and structured speech but also demonstrated with evidence, with psychosocial reports, with medical reports, with complaints ... And many will think today, because it is the easiest thing, that to sit on a television program and show
the psychological reports
of your daughter when she was 5 or 6 years old is to go back to trading with your daughter.
No, gentlemen, no.
That
Rocío Carrasco
took out last night the psychosocial report that they made to her, her son,
Rocío Flores
, and
Antonio David Flores
, at the request of the father after presenting an appeal in which he asked for the custody of his children and a million pesetas a month In terms of alimony for both of them, it is the only thing that
Rocío Carrasco has left
, it is what has been demanded of her for years, it is what is still required of her today, tests, tests and more tests.
Because she does, she has to present all the evidence she can and more, while
Antonio David Flores was
never asked for anything, because
Antonio David Flores
was the one who spoke, he was the one who sat on the sets, he was the one who gave interviews. , He was the one who picked up the phone, he was the one who warned when and where he was going to pick up the children so that they could be the cameras ...
Rocío Carrasco
, however, was the distant, the edge, the unfriendly, the excess, the The one who didn't speak, the one who never said anything, not even to defend herself.
And now that she defends herself, now that she does speak, now they still don't believe her and she knows it, and since she knows it, she presents everything she has.
It is not trading, it is trying to demonstrate and cut clean, in one fell swoop, to "the seed of evil."
How hard and terrible is what is required of Rocío Carrasco and what was never required of him, the "impious father", as the daughter of La Más Grande calls him.
Antonio David Flores, the "impious father"
Why
"ungodly father"
?
Because during all these years the image that
Antonio David Flores
has sold of his work as a father has been that of a "great father."
All, except for a few and more due to personal concerns than anything else, have seen
Antonio David Flores
as the great father, while Rocío Carrasco gradually became the "bad mother", the stigma that today tries to erase , try to get rid of it.
A great father who went to pick up his children, who hugged them tightly, protected them from the cameras -the same ones he had called-, who ensured that the environment in which they lived with their mother was not the right one, that he sowed doubt about bad habits in his mother's home, that he left his skin on the sets to show that he did care about his children, that he was with his children, that he did love his children.
And for a long time he was believed, for a long time he got what he was looking for, that he was seen as the great father to the detriment of his mother.
However, the evidence shown last night by
Rocío Carrasco
, the documents that during her testimony last night
Rocío Carrasco
grasped and squeezed with force almost without being able to breathe, collapse all that.
They show a mother who maintained a bond of admiration and love with her daughter, a controlling and egotistical father, a daughter who adored her mother to the point of rejecting "any substitute figure", a girl who was already 5 years old. When the psychosocial report was made to him at the Madrid Provincial Court, that "seed of evil" began to suffer, suffer and germinate.
This report not only describes the affective bond that
Rocío Flores
and
Rocío Carrasco
maintained, but also what the separation from her parents, the media exposure and everything that was coming and to come was implying for that girl.
Problems that psychologists begin to see and reflect in a report in which they assure that there is a risk of chronification with the mediatization of minors, but in which they also make it clear that the girl "identifies" with her mother, feels "chosen" and
"safe" in the relationship, although he feels "fears" when separating from her.
"He has been a suffering father and has never wanted to have them,"
Rocío Carrasco said
.
In case it is not clear,
Rocío Flores
and
David Flores
were already victims, the worst, the ones that hurt the most.
But the "seed of evil", despite the SOS of
Rocío Carrasco
, despite the reports that already warned of it, continued to grow, continued to feed, remained in the hands of
Antonio David Flores
.
Rocío Carrasco's
story of
that night in which her son got out of bed, went into the hall and began to shout for his mother, completely terrified for those of us who are parents, and for those who are not, is terrifying .
"My children always slept in separate rooms, with the light off and the door closed. One night my daughter wakes up, goes to the hall and starts yelling 'Mommy, where are you, Mommy!'. I got up, I'm going with her She goes to bed to reassure her, she asks me to go to sleep with her brother, I tell her 15 minutes and then Mommy goes back to sleep. But when I'm in the room with her, I kiss them, I give them the sign of the Holy Cross and When I turn off the light,
Rocío
tells me that please don't turn it off. That's when I ask her what's going on and that's when she tells me 'it's that Dad told us that when we sleep,
Fidel
and you go away and leave us alone. 'I held back the tears because I didn't want her to see me cry, I told her that was not true, I waited for them to fall asleep and when I closed their door I burst into tears without consolation. "
Shocking, just as shocking as hearing why she did nothing knowing that the father of her children was using children, she was terrorizing children to harm the mother.
"He was terrified," he
confessed, that no one tries to find an explanation because
Rocío Carrasco was
no longer
Rocío Carrasco at that time
.
The broken arm of the son of Rocío Carrasco and Antonio David Flores
Could there be anything more terrifying?
If possible.
If this moment recounted by
Rocío Carrasco
is dantesque, it is even more so the day that
Antonio David Flores
has to deliver the children back to their mother's house, he is late, arrives more than three hours late and when
Rocío Carrasco
embraces You notice your child how the child writhes in pain until he is almost exhausted.
It is when
Rocío Carrasco
sees a lump on her arm and asks her daughter what happened.
Rocío Flores
, no more than 6 years old, tells him that
David
has fallen from a bunk and that Dad has told her that Mom would take him to the doctor.
They quickly go to the emergency room of the San Rafael Hospital in Madrid.
Again, Rocío shows the medical part.
The arm was broken, broken since Friday when the boy fell off the bunk.
How is it possible that a father does not take his son to the doctor after falling from a bunk and a lump appears on his arm?
No one can understand it.
And I'm not going to go into what was said later on the set of where
Antonio David Flores was
so he wouldn't take his son to the doctor.
I do not care.
A small child, almost a baby, two days with a broken arm.
Point.
That same night,
Rocío Carrasco
went to the Guard Court and denounced
Antonio David Flores
for negligence
.
Days later withdraw the complaint.
What does it sound like?
Why have we heard this more times?
But of that only the statements of
Antonio David Flores are
recorded
saying that
Rocío Carrasco was
lying, that his son did not break his arm with him, that this did not happen.
It is called the "seed of evil".
According to the criteria of The Trust Project
Know more
Rocio Carrasco
TelecincoRocío Carrasco recounts his "hell" with Antonio David Flores, the man who does not want (nor can) name
Tribune with the permission of the people
Characteristics of Rocío Carrasco
See links of interest
2021 business calendar
Home THE WORLD TODAY
Survivors
Real Sociedad - Athletic Club
Porto - Chelsea, live
FC Bayern - PSG, live