No sooner had the flowers of Biden's inauguration faded than the bombs had already rained down.
This time on Syria, on the long-suffering Syria, which the Americans strangled with sanctions, stole its oil and wheat - and here is a new missile and bomb raid.
Trump bombed Syria only once in his four years, and Biden right off the bat.
The difference is noticeable: Trump was a popular, aggressive animal that imitated Reagan the cowboy, threatening with his club, growling, threatening, noisy, but by and large a rather harmless fellow.
He was also harmless because the American establishment hated him with all their hearts and severely branded him for any action or inaction.
Trump bombed - he was immediately reminded that he did not have permission from Congress and The New York Times.
It's easier for Biden.
Every step he takes is praised by newspapers and congress.
A State Department spokesman said: "America has the right to self-defense!"
The Pentagon added: "The purpose of this bombing strike is to de-escalate the situation in eastern Syria and Iraq."
Well-known peace-loving Democrats are delighted with the bombing of Syria.
Amy Siskind, leftist Democrat, Trump enemy with twenty years on Wall Street, fighter for rights admires: "Rely on Biden and his team, he knows how to fight, not a juvenile bully - straight to the point without threats on Twitter!"
The hypocrisy of this audience is striking to the core.
If Biden agrees to the persuasion of Albats with Volkov and decides to bomb Moscow, his communique will most likely inform that the purpose of the raid is to improve the situation of the transgender community.
And of course, for self-defense.
You can write novels about the duplicity of America's current ruling class!
However, this is what Pelevin does, whose heroes "turn on the loer", with a mean serpentine hiss they say exactly the opposite of what they are doing.
And for understanding: Republicans from the Trump party also supported the bombing of Syria.
If Syria needs to be bombed, America is united.
In one impulse with the American people, Israel also sent its missiles to Syria, but the Syrian air defenses drove the Israelis home.
Why, in fact, is Biden bombing Syria?
A few days earlier, unknown guerrillas fired at the base of the American occupation forces in Iraq, and one mercenary was killed.
The Biden regime blamed Iran.
The Iranians deny that they really want to come to an agreement with the United States, and they are trying to avoid any acts leading to an aggravation.
But Biden insists: this is Iran!
And orders to bomb Syria.
Because there, in Syria, there are allegedly Iranian military installations that can and should be bombed.
At the same time, unknown patriots sent a couple of missiles at an Israeli bulk carrier in the Persian Gulf and caused damage to it.
Israel blamed Iran, which refused this honor.
The Iranians believe that the Israeli special services are quite capable of striking the Americans in Iraq and the Israeli ships in the Gulf "under a false flag."
However, this is not the only possible explanation.
Iraqis dream of the Americans leaving, but there are a dime a dozen of such dreamers in our world, from Japan and Germany to the Philippines and Afghanistan;
American invaders are not leaving.
Moreover, under Trump, only 500 American soldiers (not counting mercenaries) remained in Iraq, and Biden has already increased this quota tenfold at the expense of NATO soldiers from Denmark and Germany.
Iraqi patriots could strike at the occupiers in such a position, and Iran, apparently, has nothing to do with it.
But now forces have risen that want to thwart a US return to the Iranian atomic deal, including Israel and its lobby in Washington.
Simultaneously with the bombing of Iranian allies in Syria, the Biden regime asked the IAEA to condemn Iran.
It would seem that the IAEA and Iran have agreed, the situation has stabilized for three months, if Biden really wants to return to the nuclear deal, he could return.
But no.
Biden demands from the IAEA a resolution condemning Iran, and then, with this resolution in hand, he will strengthen anti-Iranian sanctions.
In response, Iran expressed its readiness to immediately withdraw from the agreements and forget about their existence.
Against this background - the bombing in Syria and pressure on the IAEA - it is easy to understand Iran's decision to refuse an informal meeting with representatives of the United States and Europeans - participants in the "nuclear deal".
There is nothing to talk about in such a situation, the Iranians said.
That is, the Iranians refused a formal meeting even earlier.
In their opinion, there is nothing to talk about - if the United States wants to return to the deal, let them end the sanctions and come back.
But they agreed to an informal conversation - why not discuss the details?
It doesn't make sense now.
For Russia, there is an important reminder in this story.
The Biden regime is the most aggressive regime Russia has faced since the 1950s.
Behind a curtain of soft phrases is a steel clawed paw.
The level of danger in the Middle East and around the world is on the rise.
The author's point of view may not coincide with the position of the editorial board.