Minshengji's furnishings are mostly unfinished with a sense of responsibility
According to a recent report by the "West China Metropolis Daily", a drinking water project in a village in Tongjiang County, Bazhong City, Sichuan Province has been completed for three years, but there is still no water from time to time, and villagers rarely have access to tap water.
The local explanation stated that one is because the lift is too high and the power of the pump is too small to pump the water up; the other is because groundwater is the main source of water in the local area, but groundwater is almost depleted.
"Basically it is a decoration." Some villagers expressed their speechless and helpless about the project.
The drinking water project is an important livelihood project for the people to obtain drinking water in a timely and convenient manner. In the vast towns and rural areas, this is one of the important issues related to rural revitalization.
In recent years, various localities have actively promoted tap water to enter households, focusing on water quality, water quantity, water convenience, and water supply guarantee rate, which has strongly supported the needs of the people in production and life.
Under such a background, the drinking water projects in the above-mentioned places are useless, and it is really regrettable and confusing to spend millions of yuan to repair a "loneliness".
The construction of the drinking water project is obviously to make it truly effective, so that the people can really get convenience and benefits.
Now that the water supply station has been built for three years but has been idle, the people still have to carry water to drink.
What's the explanation?
Local people keep reporting problems, why can't the relevant departments come up with solutions?
"Building is equal to using" and "emphasizing construction rather than maintenance". Similar situations occur from time to time in other livelihood engineering fields.
Previously, the media disclosed that in the process of promoting the toilet revolution in some places, the design defects were large, the project quality was poor, and the follow-up guarantees were weak. The reconstructed toilet was used as a utility room or even directly abandoned because it was not practical. Resources and funds were wasted, and a lot of useless work was done; the roads built in some places were "broken roads" due to unscientific design and planning changes, which not only wasted, but also added to the public...
Good things must be done, and more importantly.
If you treat certain decisions and deployments with formalism, and perfunctory efforts with money spent and things done, without considering actual results, it will inevitably make people's livelihood projects greatly discounted and even become chilling projects.
At present, the above-mentioned places have already given relevant solutions, saying that they will repair and maintain local old water wells, find new water sources, and solve drinking water problems by decentralized water supply.
This time, will things really change?
Do the relevant departments make corrections when they know their mistakes and do their best?
If we want to avoid the recurrence of this kind of situation to the greatest extent, we must improve the system in terms of implementation of responsibilities, rectification and discipline, and mass supervision.
People's livelihood is never trivial. People's livelihood projects must be equipped with effective supervision and evaluation mechanisms, and the whole process of supervision from planning and project implementation, project implementation, and post-event feedback can make people truly comfortable and at ease.