The Investigative Committee of Belarus, through the Prosecutor General, sent documents to Poland for the extradition of the two founders of the Telegram channel NEXTA, recognized as extremist in the republic.
“With this country we have concluded an international treaty on legal assistance in criminal cases, which also regulates the issue of extradition,” said Mikhail Vavulo, head of the international legal department of the IC of the republic.
The moment of truth is not so much for Belarus, for which the capture of the organizers, instigators and participants in an attempted coup is a routine, but for the current elites of Poland, who are increasingly declaring their sovereignty and independence from the globalist project.
Telegram channel NEXTA is an instrument of information and political influence within the network war of the globalist West against Belarus, an element of the globalist network.
With the help of such resources, the West seizes states, placing them under its strategic control, without using conventional weapons.
This is what is called NetWar in American political science and military science - network wars.
The doctrine, officially put into service by the Pentagon, has been actively and rather successfully used in practice for more than two decades.
The main principle is to take the state away without using aviation, missile and bomb strikes, tank attacks and sweeps.
Instead, the state is captured from within by directing the negativity of the masses (existing in any country, including the United States itself) against their own government.
In order to channel these very negative energies of society in the right direction, it is necessary to carry out preliminary preparation, to create an environment in which this network strategy could be implemented.
That is, the desired society should be “settled”, covered with networks, having previously atomized it.
This is an important point in pre-war preparation.
If society is not networked, but, for example, traditional, communal, religious, conservative, then nothing will come of it.
Network strategies work only where there are networks or an atomic, fractional, discrete (also called civil) society.
Looking at Belarus, you understand that preparations for the current network war against this post-Soviet state have been taking place since the very moment of the collapse of the USSR.
At first, everyone is inspired by democracy, because it is “freedom”.
But this is, of course, a rhetorical ruse.
At least there is "freedom for" (freedom - freedom to realize your volitional principle, to do something, to achieve) and "freedom from" (liberty - freedom of emancipation, liberation from any collective identity, from tradition, common values, common morality, morality ).
The technologists of liberalism mean exactly this - emancipation, the transformation of peoples into a set of atomic individuals.
Even if you yourself mean by "freedom" something else.
Then there is the next stage: the creation of a so-called civil society in this liberated atomic environment, prepared by "democracy".
This is also not what we imagine, and not at all how we want to see it.
Civil society is an environment of political activism based on atomic (liberated) individuals, in which any political constructs can be created for any political task.
Civil society is a kind of Lego construction set: thousands of small details that can be used to create any political project.
Further, in the environment of “civil society”, so-called sensors for feedback are created - various NGOs, NGOs, research and sociological centers, with the help of which public sentiments are measured, in order to further adjust society in the way that the customer needs.
The most important role here is played by information networks and the media specially created for the seizure of the state - a media network through which the necessary formulas will be injected and civil society will be controlled from the outside at the last, final stage.
With their help, the first, test impact on society begins.
When a society is previously ready - liberated, atomized, politically inflated, covered with sensors and networks, the final stage begins: its capture.
The existing negative, which, as we said above, exists in any state, does not work by itself.
It must be correctly formulated and presented, directed to the desired point.
The weaknesses of the state are taken as a basis: as a rule, this is corruption, which is everywhere (oh, if you only knew what the scale of corruption is in the hotbed of democracy - the United States!), Usurpation of power by one person or group of persons, social ailments - medicine, education, Utilities, infrastructure, prices, standard of living, poverty.
The last two categories are completely subjective.
Their level is determined in the minds, and how exactly it is determined is actively promoted by Western networks.
The main thing is to convince a person that he “does not live well” ... and now a resident of Moscow or Minsk with a smartphone under 100K is more unhappy, poor and suffers from a low standard of living much more than a resident of a Delhi suburb who lives in a hut made of cardboard boxes or in a concrete ring lying on its side.
Further, the networks and the media, on command, begin to beat at the same points, methodically (according to the manuals) voicing the same theses, addressing them to previously prepared groups of civil activists who act as catalysts for the masses.
The masses, subject to the instinct of complicity (“if everything, then I want it too,” “I am like everyone else,” “I am on the side of the majority,” “I am on the side of the people”), go out into the streets.
Synchronization of the semantic (correctly formulated agenda), political (the connection of all previously created, bought up or intercepted political forces - parties, movements and public organizations), as well as street pressure on the authorities begins.
It is ideologically grounded (on the basis of a liberal, globalist worldview), politically consolidated and legitimized by the masses on the streets.
Further, as is well known, the authorities either retreat and surrender without a fight (as, for example, in Tunisia and Kyrgyzstan), or they begin to resist and make mistakes.
In this case, the scenario is radicalized and moves from mild forms to more and more harsh - from Molotov cocktails and snipers to civil war and the invasion of American (created with US assistance) terrorists (as, for example, in Libya and Syria).
If the current government is mobilized, made no gross mistakes and resisted, this does not mean that this is all.
On the contrary, the wave of network aggression retraces to collect used
on
lshimi forces and prepare for tighter script, and then ... However, all have long been in front of us, the whole experience of the West's network of aggression, its intensity and all its kinds in the last 30 years , whether it be Eastern Europe, the post-Soviet space or the Arab world.
So Belarus (who would have thought) is now in the epicenter of a network war.
Well, it was her turn.
And if even before it was not so noticeable, it was only because it was a preparatory phase.
First, it was necessary to accustom the post-Soviet "totalitarian" society to democracy.
Then they talk for a long time about "civil society", about the need to create dozens, if not hundreds, of NGOs to promote that very "democracy" and that very "civil society".
Then - the creation of media independent from the government and dependent on the West, writing about "freedom of speech" and "human rights" (this is also not what we think to ourselves).
At the same time, an environment of cultural occupation was created, Uniatism and Catholic ecumenism were creeping in, the West was crawling out of all cracks - culture, literature, art, cinema, music.
The Internet has greatly accelerated and simplified all these processes.
Yes, in Belarus they (sluggishly) resisted this, everything went hard and slowly.
Well, therefore, Belarus is one of the last.
While Russia, which had already survived the blow of the network war in 1991 (and then also in 1993), fought off one network attack after another, Belarus was only just warming up, its "civil society" was just warming up in the locker room.
You ask, why then did all our post-Soviet countries create all this at home - "democracy", "civil society", "human rights", "independent media", thousands of NGOs?
Why did they let in the American (private, as it turned out, to which there is no government) social networks, American mass culture and other rubbish?
So that later, with the help of all this, our countries are destroyed and captured by American political strategists?
It's a reasonable question, but it's good to live in hindsight.
Let's not blame anyone for dementia.
I also don’t want to think that our elites did it deliberately.
Let's just say they just didn't know.
But now they know how, through what, with the help of what resources they are overthrown, capturing what used to be called states.
The globalist project does not provide for any sovereign states, and NEXTA is what the Belarusian state should be used to either seize or wipe out.
That is, extremism does not even need to be proven here.
These are not peaceful demonstrators who entered the Capitol, everything is much more serious here.
Now let's get back to Poland.
If she really wants to see herself as sovereign and does not want to dissolve in the globalist project, then the creators of NEXTA - extremists Putilo and Protasevich - should be immediately handed over to Belarusian justice.
To crush in the bud, so that at the moment when American technologists notice the Polish desire for sovereignty, the Belarusian scenario does not repeat itself in Poland itself.
Let the Belarusian KGB deal with the agents of globalism in Poland.
The author's point of view may not coincide with the position of the editorial board.