Are women forced to give up their seats on the high-speed train by virtue of their "high status"?

　　Forcing women to give up their seats based on their "high status", did they feel superiority by taking the high-speed rail?

　　Talk about Fengsheng

　　The law clarifies that the act of dominance is both a breach of contract and an infringement. Obviously, relevant parties should intervene in a timely manner to actively protect the legitimate rights and interests of passengers and safeguard social justice.

　　"You should let me sit" "My identity is much higher than yours" "If you had driven you off in my work early"... On December 5, on the high-speed train from Fuyang West to Hefei South, a man wanted a cell phone The charge asked the woman to give up her seat, but the woman disagreed. Instead, she was accused by the other party, and even said that she was "high status." This scene was filmed by other passengers and posted on the Internet, which caused heated discussions.

　　On December 6, @上铁合肥客运段官微 responded that the conductor found that the two passengers had a dispute due to the seat problem, and immediately asked the situation and persuaded.

The two did not argue again and did not call the police.

　　From the report, it is not that the man involved cannot charge without changing seats. In the video, the woman also emphasized this point.

However, the man who was originally in the middle position wanted to change to the aisle position. He was so aggressive and unreasonable and plausible when he disagrees. His attitude could be called arrogant and arrogant.

　　"My identity is much higher than you." "If you had fired you in my unit early"... In addition to forcibly asking the other person to give up their seat, the man's remarks touched the public's sensitivity. point.

　　In modern society, everyone is equal, and there is no such thing as noble person.

No matter who it is, it is the same to buy a seat with money, and it is also a second-class seat, and they also have the right to check specific seats, and naturally they also have the right to decide "change" or "not change".

The man’s practice of “thinking oneself and thinning others” clearly violated the legitimate rights and interests of female passengers.

　　After the man involved revealed his "high status", many netizens were speculating about his company and position. Many people thought that he might be a state-owned enterprise or a public official, but this was just a preconceived guess. The person involved did not specify his company. Before the facts are clear, it is not advisable to make assumptions first.

　　In fact, if this man is really the leader of a certain unit, no matter which unit he is, he should be ashamed-education for education, punishment for punishment. After all, this kind of words and deeds that challenge the bottom line of social morality is for the reputation of the unit. And the image is also a kind of damage.

　　In addition, according to reports, the passenger who filmed the video said that the man also beat the female passenger at first, but he did not capture it.

Such a scenario is true, and the female passenger can also claim her rights and demand an apology.

　　At the end of the video, the woman had to get up, and the man sat down in the position of the woman and took out his own charging cable... Such an ending makes people feel like a throat.

If this is the final outcome, the bulletin from the high-speed rail is also difficult to relieve: just say this to the man's arrogant behavior, forget it, the man might really think that the behavior of forcing people to give up is not only justified, but also moral. On the commanding heights.

　　In recent years, there have been frequent incidents of train "dominance" and "forcing others to give up seats". While "dominant men and women" have been criticized by public opinion, some relevant law enforcement agencies have also repeatedly cited controversy for their insufficient enforcement actions in handling this matter.

In this regard, relevant laws clearly point out that the act of dominance is both breach of contract and infringement.

In this context, the relevant parties should obviously intervene in a timely manner to actively protect the legitimate rights and interests of female passengers and safeguard social justice.

　　If the so-called "all in peace" is just that the female passengers are unbearable and forced to give up their seats by the aggressive men, it is obviously not a good ending, and it is also a bad example for society.

　　□Fan Cheng (media person)