Can withdrawal from the parent group break the deadlock in education

　　"I just quit the parent group?" Recently, a parent's "roar" went viral.

The parent complained in the video: I taught me to teach, and I changed it. After that, he still said without conscience that the teacher worked hard. Who worked hard?

　　Perhaps it was because too many parents thought that this video once soared to the top of Weibo hot topics.

However, after a little analysis, it is not difficult to find that this superficial imposing manner, but behind it hides weakness and helplessness.

If you are really righteous, you will withdraw.

Retiring from a group and recording a "roar" video just shows that resignation is unwilling and unwilling, and it is compelling.

　　The parent group is a platform for home-school communication, and many important messages are conveyed through this platform.

"What's the matter with me just withdrawing from the parent group?" It seemed happy, but it was a bit of reckless bitterness.

What to do after retiring?

How do you know the status of your child at school?

How to get the school's notice and teacher's advice?

Behind the news, many netizens issued "resonance": I miss the days without parent groups.

　　This kind of "nostalgia" just put a rosy veil on the memory.

Of course, some teachers frequently send notices in the group to "send children" to parents, which adds a lot of burden to parents.

However, the problem of "group" is not in the group, but outside the group.

If a teacher asks parents to correct students’ work, can the teacher not make such a request by leaving the parent group?

I'm afraid it's self-deception.

　　The parent group is just a tool, and how to use it depends on the people involved.

So, the real question is: Why do some teachers think that parents can correct their homework or do more "cross-line" things?

In fact, the relevant departments have spoken out many times regarding the management of the "group".

Last year, the Ministry of Education clearly stated in its response to the CPPCC member’s proposal: “Teachers shall not assign homework through mobile phone WeChat and QQ.” Zhejiang and other provinces have successively issued regulations stating that schools must not assign homework in parent groups or require parents to submit by punching in. Cultural subject assignments, etc.

Recently, the Taiyuan Education Bureau proposed that it is strictly forbidden to ask parents to correct homework, clean the classroom, and like and forward all kinds of information.

　　The attitude of the competent authority is so clear, why are there still teachers who ask parents to mark homework?

In addition to the ethics of individual teachers, this is probably also related to the atmosphere of the entire education field.

　　The Chinese have always attached great importance to education, and some parents do not hesitate to devote all they can to the education of their children.

I save money and report a training class worth tens of thousands of yuan to my child, but he is not hesitating; going to work may not be the first time to respond to work tasks, but the school sends a notice but immediately responds "received, thank you teacher"... The competition in education is becoming increasingly fierce. Be willing to let your children fall behind others by half a step.

For teachers who can influence their children's "future", parents of course attach great importance to and cooperate fully.

As a result, some teachers will inevitably "get an inch"-since parents are so active, let's do more.

　　On the other hand, in the case of excessive competition, parents are increasingly demanding education, and it has become a common phenomenon to report various training courses outside of school.

These are all manifestations of the family's spontaneous "overweight" for children's education.

No one can say that they are satisfied with their children's academic performance. Even if the school grades are already very good, there are more art classes, competition classes, and sports specialty training waiting.

　　Perhaps someone has discovered that this scene is very similar to the recently popular concept of "involution".

In a certain field, people are investing more and more, so the increased output is very limited.

Some people use the "theatre effect" to explain this phenomenon.

In a theater, the people in the front row stood up in order to see more clearly, and the people in the back row had to stand up as well. In the end, all the people in the theater could only stand and watch the play.

Although everyone paid more, but no one got a better experience.

　　This situation is hateful and helpless.

Everyone wants to break the deadlock, but no one wants to be the first to withdraw from the competition.

This is why when that father dropped out of the group, many parents applauded him-he did something that others wanted to do but dared not do.

　　Of course, parents can communicate with teachers, complain to the school, or complain to the local authorities for obvious unreasonable requirements such as teachers asking parents to correct homework, so as to resolve the problem with confidence through these channels.

It’s just that it’s impossible to ignore the child’s learning from now on.

Is leaving the group a good way to solve the problem?

I'm afraid I can only do it for a while.

　　Source of soil and velvet: China Youth Daily