China News Service, Guilin, October 30 (Jiang Li, Huang Yanming, Lin Hao) On October 29, the Intermediate People's Court of Guilin City, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, conducted the first instance of the criminal case of 51 criminal organizations including the defendant Chen Jifu and 2 "protective umbrellas." Public judgment.

　　Among them, Chen Jifu, the organizer and leader of the case, was sentenced to life imprisonment, deprived of political rights for life, and confiscated all personal property, with a fine of 18.25 million yuan.

The remaining 50 defendants were sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment ranging from 20 years to one year, as well as confiscation of all personal property or fines.

The picture shows 51 defendants including Chen Jifu appearing in court.

Photo courtesy of Guilin Intermediate People's Court

　　Gui Baodong, former deputy director of the Fangchenggang Public Security Bureau, the organization’s "protective umbrella", committed bribery, shelter, and connivance to triad organizations, and was punished for several crimes. He decided to carry out a fixed-term imprisonment of 11 years and fined RMB 300,000; Fangchenggang Yao Peiheng, former deputy secretary of the Municipal Commission for Disciplinary Inspection and former director of the Fangchenggang Supervision Bureau, was guilty of taking bribes, sheltering underworld organizations, and crimes of bigamy. He decided to carry out a fixed-term imprisonment of 12 years and 6 months and a fine of RMB 50. Ten thousand yuan.

The picture shows the defendant Gui Baodong appearing in court.

Photo courtesy of Guilin Intermediate People's Court

　　The court found that from 1995 to 1996, Chen Jifu and others used daring to fight and kill, and the two assaults injuring people were not dealt with. They established a notoriety in Jiangping Town, Dongxing City.

From 1997 to the beginning of 1999, Chen Jifu gathered people to lend at high profit, illegally collect debts, went to sea for many times to rob, forced to buy and sell, and monopolized the local seafood market for illegal profits, and initially formed a criminal organization headed by him.

From the beginning of 1999 to 2008, despite being hit three times, Chen Jifu kept the key members stable and constantly recruited new people, smuggled in Jiangping Town and Dongxing City, and carried out illegal and criminal activities such as shooting competitors, provoking troubles, deliberately injuring and bribing. Expanding the organization's power to Dongxing City, established the core interests of the organization to profit from smuggling.

　　After serving his sentence in 2008 and ending in June 2019, Chen Jifu continued to develop and grow his organization. He used criminals to protect private individuals in Dongxing City and surrounding areas, and carried out violent anti-law robbery, crowd fights, extortion, and provocations. , Illegal detention, deliberate destruction of property and other illegal and criminal activities, and established and controlled a number of entity companies to conceal and conceal the source and nature of the organization’s interests, and carry out various economic crimes, seizing huge amounts of illegal wealth, and at the same time bribing state officials. Seek illegal protection.

The organization dominates one side, competes for territory, fights fiercely, harms the masses, and confronts the government. It has existed for more than 20 years. It has illegally controlled or significantly affected the Dongxing City area and the smuggling area of ​​the city, and has seriously damaged the local economy and society. Life order and political ecological environment.

The picture shows the defendant Yao Peiheng appearing in court.

Photo courtesy of Guilin Intermediate People's Court

　　From 2010 to 2016, defendant Gui Baodong took advantage of his position to seek benefits for others, and illegally received a total of RMB 2.67 million in property from others.

From 2010 to 2011, the defendant Gui Baodong knew that Chen Jifu and others had been engaged in smuggling illegal and criminal activities for a long time, and still received benefits from him many times, sheltering and conniving Chen Jifu and his underworld organizations in smuggling and other illegal and criminal activities. The organization grabs a lot of economic benefits.

　　From the end of 2010 to 2019, the defendant Yao Peiheng used the convenience of his position to obtain illegitimate benefits for others through the staff of other countries, and he used the convenience of his position or cooperated with the staff of other countries to use the convenience of his position to seek benefits for others, and illegally received the property of others. 5.395251 million yuan.

In 2010, the defendant Yao Peiheng and Chen Jifu met. He knew that he had been engaged in gang smuggling activities for a long time and still accepted him many times.

In 2017, Chen Jianyi, a member of the Chen Jifu gangster organization, was prosecuted for suspected crimes. Chen Jifu approached Yao Peiheng for help. Yao Peiheng agreed and greeted the investigators, facilitating the probation of Chen Jianyi's sentence.

In 2015, Yao Peiheng still held a wedding with Lin Moumou during the marriage, and lived together in the name of husband and wife with two children.

　　After the trial, the court held that the actions of the defendant Chen Jifu and other 51 persons constituted the crimes of organizing, leading, participating in the underworld organization, robbery, assembling a crowd, extortion, provoking trouble, illegal detention, smuggling of ordinary goods, and smuggling. Crimes of goods prohibited from import and export by the state.

Defendant Gui Baodong constituted the crime of accepting bribes, sheltering, and conniving underworld organizations. In view of his confession and punishing, he can be punished lightly according to law.

The defendant Yao Peiheng constituted a crime of accepting bribes, a crime of sheltering a triad organization, and a crime of bigamy.

Yao Peiheng committed multiple crimes alone and should be punished for multiple crimes in accordance with law.

The court then made the above-mentioned judgment in accordance with the law of the defendants' crimes, circumstances and degree of social harm.

(Finish)