One day after the government denied the possibility of a bad reception in Europe of its judicial counter-reform, Europe responded by expressing its concern.

'The Commission is aware of the announcement on this new legislative draft.

We are closely following the development of this matter, "a Justice spokesman revealed to EL MUNDO.

Brussels warns Sánchez that his project points to a violation of community regulations

in the national-populist line of the Visegrad group.

And i

It is that every member country of the Union must consult "with all relevant actors" on any reform of the Judiciary.

Among those relevant actors, obviously, are the judges - three of the four majority associations have already denounced the outrage -, the prosecutors and the opposition,

Against which this iniquitous bill has been expressly designed

.

"States must follow European standards to ensure that the independence of judges is not compromised," they warn from Europe.

The mere warning portrays the cacicada. Pedro Sánchez has already demonstrated enough times that he is a politician without words and allergic to accountability.

Confronting him with his principles and promises of the past has become a melancholic exercise

.

But there are times when the scent of cynicism, so thick, becomes especially unbearable.

In an official document sent to the European Commission last spring, the Executive boasted that in Spain judges are being renewed with a three-fifths majority in Parliament - which forces them to agree with the opposition - and that this is a safeguard of the judicial independence that would be lost if the election depended on "a concrete and conjunctural parliamentary majority."

This is the report sent by the Ministry of Justice to the Commission on April 28 to pass the community examination on the situation of our rule of law.

Have you calculatedly waited for the report to undertake the outrage?

What was a source of democratic pride, and rightly so, is now becoming a hindrance

.

What has happened in between? It is not about the blockade of the PP, as the official propaganda argues.

It should not be so difficult for Sánchez to return to Sánchez's positions when he was in the opposition and agree with Casado on a reform of the election system in the sense that now the PP, and always Europe, want.

And in any case

no blockade justifies the authoritarian alternative

: you crush the Constitution while accusing the PP of not complying with it.

What we suspect, after learning that Sánchez gave the order to process the counter-reform after agreeing on it with Iglesias, is that deactivating the last power that may contradict his will and try to save Iglesias from the imputation by threatening the judges is more important to Sánchez than him. Rule of law.

Because Sánchez knows that the validity of the coalition may depend on judicial independence, but in addition the cacicada puts European funds at risk to alleviate the consequences of the covid.

The current current in Nordic countries is

not ratify money transfers if there are no clear conditions of respect for the division of powers

in recipient countries.

To continue reading for free

Sign inSign up

Or

subscribe to Premium

and you will have access to all the web content of El Mundo

According to the criteria of The Trust Project

Know more