China News Service, September 13 According to the official website of the Beijing Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection, on the 13th, the Beijing Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection and the Beijing Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection reported on the investigation of suspected duty crimes in the "Guo Wensi commutation case".
The full text is as follows:
On February 24, 2005, Guo Wensi was sentenced to life imprisonment for committing intentional homicide.
After 9 commutations, he was released on July 24, 2019.
At 15:00 on March 14, 2020, when Guo Wensi was shopping in the supermarket, he infringed Duan who was prompted to wear a mask correctly, causing Duan to be injured and killed.
After the incident, public opinion strongly demanded severe punishment for Guo Wensi's deliberate injurious behavior, and strongly questioned the effectiveness of his repeated sentence reductions and reforms.
The Beijing Municipal Party Committee attaches great importance to it, and the Municipal Party Committee’s Political and Legal Committee has strengthened its supervision. After investigation by the public security organs, Guo Wensi was found to be suspected of intentional injury and was sentenced to criminal punishment for intentional homicide. He still does not want to repent and commits a violent crime again. The subjective malignancy is extremely deep , The consequences of the crime are extremely serious and the society is extremely harmful.
On March 28, the Second Branch of the Municipal People’s Procuratorate approved the arrest of Guo Wensi on suspicion of intentional injury.
At present, the case of Guo Wensi's intentional injury causing death has been transferred to the procuratorial organ for review and prosecution.
On March 31, Beijing established a joint investigation team, led by the Municipal Committee of Political Science and Law, with the participation of the Municipal Supervisory Committee and the Municipal People’s Procuratorate, and conducted investigations on Guo Wensi’s multiple commutations in accordance with discipline and law.
The Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision also set up a task force to conduct disciplinary review, supervision and investigation of suspected violations of discipline and law and duty crimes.
The Supervisory Committee of the Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection insisted on conducting inspections and investigations in accordance with regulations, disciplines and laws, and through the transfer of Chaobai Prison and Qingyuan Prison of Qinghe Branch of the Municipal Prison Administration, the Municipal Prison Administration and Qinghe Branch, the Municipal Qinghe People’s Procuratorate, and the City’s First Intermediate People’s Court Documents and materials related to Guo Wensi’s sentence during his sentence, commutation procedures, meeting minutes, ruling files, etc., interrogated persons under investigation and witnesses, and taken lien measures for relevant personnel in accordance with the law. After more than 5 months of work, it has been found that "Guo Wensi The relevant personnel in the commutation case are suspected of crimes committed by duty.
After investigation, Guo Wensi has served sentences in Tianhe Prison, Chaobai Prison, Qingyuan Prison, Yanqing Prison, and Liulin Prison. The problem of violations and commutation mainly occurred in Chaobai Prison and Qingyuan Prison.
Guo Wanpu (the father of Guo Wensi, a retired employee of the China Institute of Atomic Energy) during Guo Wensi's sentence, directly or through others, asked the prison system, the procuratorate, and the relevant staff of the court, and provided money and goods to seek care for Guo Wensi's life in prison. , To help Guo Wensi reduce his sentence quickly.
There are mainly the following facts of suspected duty crime.
1. Guo Wanpu directly asked Wang Naicong (the instructor of the Chaobai Prison sub-district at the time) to give gifts and cash, and asked him to take care of Guo Wensi's life in prison and provide help for his rapid commutation.
Wang Naicong arranged for Guo Wensi in violation of the rules to hold multiple jobs that are conducive to the commutation of sentences. He arranged meetings in violation of the rules and transferred letters for Guo Wensi privately. He was not punished for Guo Wensi’s violation of the supervision regulations; instructed his colleagues to take care of Guo Wensi, which is why Guo Wensi is in Chaobai During the prison sentence, several reductions were provided to help.
2. Through Gan Jialiang (Deputy General Manager of Beijing Xingpai Sporting Goods Group Co., Ltd.), Guo Wanpu asked Sui Jianjun (the party secretary and warden of Chaobai Prison at the time) to give cash several times. Sui Jianjun asked Guo Wensi to reduce his sentence. provide help.
Sui Jianjun asked his subordinates to take care of Guo Wensi's life in prison through hints or greetings; he presided over the office meeting of the warden six times and signed and approved the commutation documents when he knew that Guo Wensi did not meet the conditions for commutation; Qinghe People’s Procuratorate, the Deputy Director of the Prison Procuratorate) requested and gave cash and a shopping card to reduce Guo Wensi’s sentence and greet Cheng Lixia (the judge of Qinghe Court of the City’s First Intermediate People’s Court) and others.
3. Guo Wanpu asked Li Nan (salesperson of Beijing Yilin Shunkang Technology Development Co., Ltd.) and Wang Yu (legal representative of Beijing Yilin Shunkang Technology Development Co., Ltd.) to entrust Liu Yongqing (then the party committee member and deputy branch director of Qinghe Branch of the Municipal Prison Administration) , Has given cash several times, and asked Liu Yongqing to provide attention to Guo Wensi's sentence reduction.
Liu Yongqing then greeted Duan Bingchuan (the party secretary and warden of Qingyuan Prison at the time) and Chen Wei (member of the Qingyuan Prison Party Committee and deputy warden) and asked Guo Wensi to be taken care of.
Duan Bingchuan and Chen Wei respectively greeted their subordinates and accepted a banquet from Li Nan and Wang Yu.
When reporting the commutation, Duan Bingchuan and Chen Wei attended the prison director's meeting and agreed to declare a commutation for Guo Wensi's violation of the rules.
4. Through Wang Xiao (employee of Beijing Radio and Television Station), Guo Wanpu asked Guo Jingxia (the deputy director of the Office of the Municipal No. 1 Intermediate People's Court) to greet Cheng Lixia and others.
During the trial of Guo Wensi's commutation case, Cheng Lixia and others lowered the evidence review standard, violated the procedural regulations for case trial, and ruled that Guo Wensi who did not meet the conditions for commutation should be reduced.
Guo Jingxia received the cash from Wang Xiao, and Cheng Lixia and others received the cash from Guo Jingxia.
The Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision decided that Liu Yongqing, Sui Jianjun, Duan Bingchuan, Chen Wei, Wang Naicong, Guo Jingxia, Cheng Lixia, Zhao Shuangyue, as well as Guo Wanpu, Gan Jialiang, Wang Xiao, Li Nan, Wang Yu and others were suspected of accepting bribes, bribery, and practicing favoritism and reduced their sentences. According to the relevant provisions of the Supervision Law of the People’s Republic of China, the above-mentioned persons were transferred to the procuratorial organ for review and prosecution according to law.
In accordance with the relevant provisions of the "Chinese Communist Party Disciplinary Measures" and "The Supervision Law of the People's Republic of China", Liu Yongqing, Sui Jianjun and other 9 party members and public officials were expelled from the party and from public office (retirement benefits).
In addition, other people who violated discipline and law in the Guo Wensi commutation case were given party discipline and government sanctions, and the delinquents were held seriously accountable.
The Beijing Municipal Party Committee has always been clear-cut and firm in investigating and handling the "Guo Wensi commutation case", insisting on thorough investigations and serious punishments, demonstrating a clear attitude of "zero tolerance" for unfair law enforcement and law enforcement violations.
Party organizations and party members and cadres at all levels must learn lessons deeply and draw inferences from one another.
It is necessary to effectively strengthen the comprehensive and strict governance of the party, adhere to the main theme of "strictness" for a long time, and put all levels of responsibility in place; it is necessary to strictly educate and supervise and manage cadres, and strengthen the party spirit and legal discipline education of leading cadres, especially the "top leaders". Strengthen day-to-day supervision; we must comprehensively strengthen system construction, plug system loopholes, improve system enforcement, and attack violations of discipline and law whenever they appear to ensure that power is always operating in the system cage.
The majority of party members and cadres must stick to the people's stand, exercise power correctly, use power fairly, in accordance with the law, and use power cleanly, and consciously fight against violations of discipline and law.
The Beijing Municipal People’s Procuratorate issued a notice on the 13th. Recently, after the investigation by the Beijing Municipal Supervisory Commission, the 14 public officials and important related parties involved in the Guo Wensi commutation case were transferred to Beijing on suspicion of bribery, bribery, and commutation for malpractice for personal gain. Relevant city procuratorate review.
After the investigation by the Beijing Municipal Public Security Bureau was concluded, the case of the criminal suspect Guo Wensi who intentionally injured and caused death has been transferred to the Second Branch of the Beijing Municipal People’s Procuratorate for review and prosecution.
The aforementioned cases are under review.
Beijing's procuratorial organs will handle cases strictly in accordance with the law, earnestly perform procuratorial duties, and earnestly safeguard judicial justice.
The Beijing Municipal Bureau of Justice issued a notice on the 13th. On the 13th, the Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection and the Municipal Supervisory Committee issued a report on the investigation of the Guo Mousi commutation case. The outstanding problems exposed by the case, the lessons are profound, and it is alarming. The judicial administrative system of the city must be profound. Reflect, draw inferences from one another, and resolutely rectify thoroughly.
The Beijing judicial administrative system will strengthen the main responsibility, strict discipline, strengthen accountability, learn from the case, comprehensively strengthen the supervision and management of key areas and key links of prisons and drug rehabilitation, carry out education and rectification in the judicial administrative system, and implement the judicial administrative system Law enforcement and judicial control and supervision of various systems and regulations, and constantly improve the credibility of law enforcement and justice.
The Beijing Municipal Prison (Drug Rehabilitation) Bureau issued a notice on the 13th. On the 13th, the Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection and the Municipal Supervisory Committee issued a report on the investigation of Guo Wensi’s commutation case. The case exposed some outstanding problems of police violations of law and discipline. The nature and the impact were extremely bad. The Municipal Prison (Drug Rehabilitation) Bureau will deeply learn from the lesson, take it as a warning, and implement reforms, thoroughly investigate and reform.
The Municipal Prison (Drug Rehabilitation) Bureau will further consolidate the party’s responsibilities for police management, deeply analyze the causes and lessons of Guo Wensi’s commutation case, carry out education and rectification, learn from the case, use the case to promote reform, and strictly implement commutation and parole And the temporary execution system outside prison, comprehensively deepen the criminal daily management and supervision system, and resolutely plug the loopholes in the execution of criminal punishment and the daily management of criminals.
Sincerely welcome all sectors of society to supervise the work of the Municipal Prison (Drug Rehabilitation) Bureau.
The Political and Legal Committee of the Beijing Municipal Party Committee issued a notice on the 13th. In response to the outstanding problems exposed in the Guo Wensi commutation case, the Municipal Committee of the Political and Legal Committee will further consolidate the party group (party committee) of the political and legal organs at all levels in the city to strictly govern the party's main responsibility, and arrange for the political and legal units to carry out warnings. Education, in-depth education and rectification in the judicial administrative system.
The Political and Legal Committee of the Municipal Party Committee urged the Municipal High Court, the Municipal Procuratorate, and the Municipal Judicial Bureau to amend and supplement the "Beijing Regulations on Sentence Reduction and Parole Work (for Trial Implementation)", "Beijing Implementation Rules for the Trial Procedures for Sentence Reduction and Parole Cases (for Trial Implementation)" and "Beijing Detailed Rules for the Implementation of the Municipal Provisions on Temporary Execution Outside Prison (for Trial Implementation), further improve the system and specifications, and strengthen the supervision of cases of penalty change execution.
We welcome all sectors of the society to strengthen the supervision of the entire municipal law organs, and thank you for your concern and support for the entire municipal law work.
The Beijing Higher People’s Court issued a notice on the 13th that our court reviewed Guo Wensi’s previous commutation cases based on the investigation by the Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection and the Municipal Supervision Committee, and believed that Guo Wensi’s commutation cases were indeed wrong, and the retrial procedure has been initiated.
At the same time, our court reviewed the case of Guo Wensi's intentional homicide trial by Beijing No. 2 Intermediate People's Court in 2005, and found that the trial and judgment of the case complied with the law.
Regarding the violations of laws and disciplines of individual public officials in the court system exposed in the Guo Wensi commutation case, our court will deeply learn lessons and draw inferences from one another. In the city's courts, we will carry out in-depth warning education of "taking cases as a mirror and using cases to promote reform", and improve the operation of judicial power. Supervise and restrict the mechanism, adhere to the strict governance of the party, the courts, and the strict management, continuously improve the quality and effectiveness of trials, and continuously improve judicial credibility, and strive to make the people feel fair and just in every judicial case.