China News Agency, Beijing, July 7th (Reporter Zhang Su) The 2020 China College Entrance Examination kicked off. The Supreme People's Court of China issued a case of cheating in organizing the college entrance examination and reiterated that the judiciary will ensure that each candidate responds fairly to the “volume of life”.

  The cheating case of organizing the college entrance examination was publicly pronounced by the People's Court of Jiangjin District in Chongqing a few days ago. The case shows that the defendant, He Mouhao, is a college student in Jiangjin District, Chongqing. Before the 2019 China College Entrance Examination, he posted an advertisement for "assistance test" on the Internet and left his contact information. 12 candidates from Guangdong, Shandong, Guizhou and other places It pays the "registration fee". He Mouhao contacted Nie Mouwu, a university student in Jiangxi, via the Internet. During the college entrance examination, He Mouhao, Nie Mouwu and Peng Moulin (a classmate of He Mouhao) collaborated in cheating. He Mouhao is responsible for communicating the test questions and answering the questions, Nie Mouwu is responsible for solving the questions, and Peng Moulin is responsible for sorting out the test questions and jointly accomplishing cheating for the 12 candidates.

  On June 8, 2019, after receiving the clue, the police went to the school where He Mouhao and Peng Moulin were located to stop the cheating behavior being carried out by the two of them on the spot; from the 12th to the 13th, the three were arrested on suspicion of organizing cheating for the examination. Go to court. After investigation, He Mouhao collected a total of 10,200 yuan (RMB, the same below) for the candidates, the defendant Nie Mouwu received 900 yuan, and the defendant Peng Moulin received 100 yuan. After arriving at the case, all three confessed to the criminal act of cheating in participating in the organization of the examination and pleaded guilty. After the case, He Mouhao and his family turned in all the stolen money.

  The court comprehensively accused the defendant's criminal circumstances, social hazards, and guilty and guilty attitudes, and made a judgment in accordance with the law: he was sentenced to three years and six years in prison for the crime of organizing an exam to cheat, and he was fined RMB 3,000; The defendant Nie Mouwu was sentenced to three years in prison with a fine of RMB 1,000; the defendant Peng Moulin was sentenced to two years in prison and suspended for three years with a fine of RMB 1,000.

  After the judgment, none of the three defendants filed an appeal and the judgment is now in effect. The 12 candidates who participated in the cheating will be dealt with seriously by the local education management department according to law.

  "The judgment on the fraud case of organizing the college entrance examination is a powerful answer given by the People's Court to resolutely maintain the fairness of the education system." said Han Deyun, a representative of the National People's Congress and a lawyer at Chongqing Suotong Law Firm. Another person in the legal profession noticed that all the defendants in this case had the status of college students, but this did not make the judgment "on the net." Although one of them only made a profit of 100 yuan, he was still "sentenced to two and suspended three," demonstrating a clear attitude that the people's court would never condone.

  To sort out the crimes of cheating in the college entrance examination cheating, in addition to the crime of cheating in the above-mentioned organization exams, there are: the crime of illegally selling, providing test questions, answers, replacing the test, illegally producing and selling special spy equipment, eavesdropping, stolen special equipment, illegal The crimes of using eavesdropping and eavesdropping special equipment, the crime of disturbing the order of radio communication management, the crime of illegally obtaining state secrets, the crime of illegally holding state top secrets, confidential documents, materials and articles, the crime of intentionally leaking state secrets, the crime of negligently leaking state secrets, etc. (Finish)