A reporter appeared, stating that he was a murder teacher in the 1999 murder.

On the 27th, SBS'I Want to Know It' highlighted the'Jeju Lee Lawyer Murder Case' with the subtitle of'I am a murder teacher-Jeju Lee Lawyer Murder Case'.

A man was found dead in a vehicle in 1999. The dead man is Mr. Lee. He was a lawyer from the prosecutor who graduated from Seoul National University Law School from Jeju Island.

The man is said to have been killed by a sharp heart attack. In response, the investigating agency looked at the situation and determined that it was likely to be a murderer, saying that it would have been subdued and killed in an instant.

Investigation agencies in Jeju Island devoted themselves to the case to find the killer, but even the weapon used by the killer was not specified, and in 2014, after the statute of limitations, it remained a permanent US case.

The reason the production staff was covering the incident was because of a single e-mail sent to them. The reporter told the production staff that his acquaintance was the murderer in the case.

And according to his reports, he was given four weeks by the bosses of the same gang members'Seagull' and a violent organization'Yaktakpa', and the seagull killed Mr. Lee. He also talked about how to make the weapon used for the crime.

Regarding his testimony, Professor Pyo Chang-won said, "It's like a story you can't decorate." Not only that, other experts also said that his statement was highly credible.

The production team then hung to find the truth about the case. And the crew found out that Lee, who was murdered, is just and unbearable when he sees injustice. He also proved to be a lawyer who offered free pleadings for the unfortunate. Also, he tried to find a solution to the'Jeju 4.3' incident and is known to be related to various events in Jeju Island.

In particular, it was found that during the 1998 Governor of Jeju Island, he helped a conscience declaration of a young man who received a money from a candidate. At that time, Governor Shin Gu-beom of the Governor of Jeju said, "If he had not traced the declaration of conscience, it might not have been killed."

The young man who made the declaration of conscience was suddenly subdued, and the lawyer hung up to reveal the truth to the end and was later killed.

So, was the real killer who killed Lee? The production team recalled the reporter's statement. The crew felt the reporter's statement was between confession and asked the reporter again. And I thought I said something as if I had seen it through the reporter's statement.

The opinions of experts were similar. Experts watched the video of the four-and-a-half-hour reporter's statement and said, "Why should I go about this story now? I can't see my motive purely." In particular, experts said, "It is difficult to restore a friend's reputation with this statement because it is because of the burden on a colleague, a sense of guilt, and a feeling of guilt."

In addition, the crew confirmed that the wounds in Lee's body were far from the accidental murder claimed by the reporter. Experts said, "It was urgent to defend. The perpetrator was overwhelmingly superior." It would be a planned murder that reflected strength and will. There was a rapid attack that could not be defended, and it was a planned crime for a long time."

And a former detective in Jeju Island said, "I have never seen a murder order by a violent organization." "I have never seen a gangster kill a civilian." In addition, Yu Takpa's current boss said, "That's impossible."

The current boss, who met with the production crew, countered that it doesn't make sense since Mr. Baek ordered the murder 21 years ago. He said to Mr. Baek, "I'm a gentle man. I can't make sense to take kids under 20 years and commit crimes. There are rules in our world, too." The seagull died because he suffered from misinvestment and misinvestment. The person who did it is bad."

And the expert said of the reporter's testimony about the passage to a friend's seagull, "I have to talk as I have heard, but I do not seem to be talking as I have heard." In fact, the reporter caught his eye because he talked about what the seagulls had gone through and couldn't remember exactly what they were doing. It also revealed parts that really differed from his claim.

The expert said, "In situations where the seagull did it, it would be natural to remove the seagull and add an informant." It was judged that there was a high possibility that it was adapted as a seagull.

And the production team met an acquaintance who was close to Mr. Baek. His acquaintance said that it was when Baek was in prison in 1999. As a result of the interview, he was imprisoned five years before the incident and was released after Lee died. And if he ordered the murder, the place had to be a prison, but the reporter's claim was different.

The acquaintance who knew the reporter said that he would be in need of money, saying he was addicted to drugs and gambling. However, it is impossible for him to make money by talking to the production team and making a statement.

Experts said, "It seems to send a warning to the person who actually asked for the murder." Said.

So, the production team shared what they had covered with the Jeju Regional Police Agency. The police said that they would try to reveal the truth to the extent allowed by the law and the system.

In addition, the production team received a laptop that was used right before Lee's death when Lee died, and asked for a digital forensic restoration work to pray for reinvestigation.

Lastly, the broadcaster said that it would be impossible for him to suddenly submerge, as he now has a list of all the inmates' inhabitants and contacts with him. He also told the reporter that it would be Mr. Lee's murderer, or at least in the murder place, or an accomplice.

He also promised that he would know the identity of the real client who asked to kill Lee, and that he would not stop pursuing the real culprit that took Lee's life to the end.

(SBS funE Kim Hyo-jung Editor)