Once upon a time in Hollywood ... the road to the door of "Heaven"!

Quentin Tarantino is certainly one of the Seven Masters of Art with his innovative new artistic offering in his films. It is not surprising that he achieved this status; his distinguished vision drew attention to him first in European film festivals, and from that he went to American film festivals, then Hollywood grabbed him to make a set of his films that achieved him fame and success.

His film "Once Upon a Time in Hollywood" is a kind of show of cinema magic in the 1960s and 1970s. He adopted a novelist on the star of the Hollywood sun, which was Clip Booth (Leonardo DiCaprio), and his assistant Doppler Rick Dalton (Brad Pitt) who instead performs dangerous scenes and endures the star’s collapse.

This film, on a parallel line, reviews the story of Sharon Tate (Margo Ruby), and she lives with her husband, the brilliant film director Roman Polanski, in a luxury villa, adjacent to the modest villa inhabited by the star who left his star.

In the course of the events, a group of the "Charles Miller Manson" sect comes to kill Sharon Tate, attacking the wrong villa, the villa of the aforementioned star, and the macho-doppler confronts them and kills them. Police and ambulances come, and Sharon learns from one of her friends that she invites the star to complete the evening with her owners, and when he agrees to the invitation, the huge gates of the villa open; as if the doors of glory in Hollywood were to open, so that they entered a triumphant path to glory.

Tarantino here contradicts the historical incident upon which the events of the film were based. History says that this real incident ended in the killing of "Sharon Tate" with her fetus who was in the eighth month, when she and her five owners were massacred in a bloody massacre that the world had not forgotten. Her husband Polanski presented his film - which was a resounding success in London - "Rosemary Baby" on this incident.

Consider how Tarantino crafted all this. We will find that the dominant streak in the movie is the star's fate and suffering after the lights recede from him, and as soon as he gets the opportunity of what we see he sharpens himself as an actor, and preserves his role well, hoping to provide a scene that applauds the audience.

The poignant scene created by the movie is when a girl approaches the female participants in the work, whispering to him meekly: "He gave the most wonderful acting", and in this scene the star collapses and cries a bitter cry for his condition. This scene reminds me of another of the Egyptian star Ahmed Ramzi in the movie "Gossip over the Nile", in which he played a similar role to the role of "Leonardo DiCaprio" when he performed a scene inside Plateau, knowing how trivial he is, and the fans come to him, headed by Mervat Amin, to offer him congratulations.

The camera is approaching the face of Ahmed Ramzi, while he is holding a fan with his hand, waving it quietly tinged with nervousness, and his face shows an angry, muffled excitement, knowing that he is forced to present this sickness to remain present in his field of art, even if it is false and not worthy of his previous glory. This ingenious shot of Ahmed Ramzy is one of the best movie clips of all time, and it stands parallel to that of DiCaprio.

We return to Tarantino. In his film, he presented the world of "hippie" as an empty society steeped in drugs, emptiness and banality. But it is worth clarifying that there is a difference between the real hippie community - which adopted the call for a return to nature and peace in response to America's brutal policy in the Vietnam War and other wars - and the "Charles Manson" sect presented in the film; the latter succeeded in convincing a group of girls That he was revealed to him, and in order to become more convincing, he courted the hippie movement and took it as a cover for him.

In any case, the presentation of the American cinema to the hippie movement was mostly negative, and this movement was only fairly done in a few works, foremost of which was the movie "Hare" by Molish Foreman who presented the hippie character with its deeper dimension, as opposed to the banality of the empty, shallow youth who move with the orders of the institution. To enter the Vietnam War without knowing a compelling reason for this war.

On another historical level, the "Charles Manson" sect did not mean to kill Sharon Tate, but rather one of the rich intended to refuse to provide financial assistance to them. When the Manson sect went to kill him, he had unfortunately sold the villa to Polanski and his wife, Sharon, and the sect killed those in the villa without distinguishing between them.

But why exactly did Tarantino choose the paradox of the murder of Sharon Tate? Why also introduced the American star of Chinese origin, "Bruce Lee" in his movie in this manner contrary to the usual; where the "Brad Pitt" the American hit "Chinese" Bruce Lee? Is this related in one way or another to the conflict between the United States of America and China?

We also notice some scenes in which Leonardo used a fire hose to burn a Nazi, and what these people did was known to the Jews. Turning to the last scenes, specifically the scene of the Manson Gang attack on the villa and the defense of DiCaprio and Brad Pitt about it, we find Decaprio also using the fire hose to burn a gang member who wanted to kill Sharon Tate the Jewish.

Then we reach the last scene in the movie, where Sharon invites Leonardo to dinner in appreciation of his noble position and opens the gate of heaven and glory in front of him: The Hollywood Gate, opened by Roman Polanski, Sharon Tate, meaning that the civilized Jewish force opens it as a reward for his work. Thus Tarantino presented us with a multidimensional and multi-level film, but - in the end - we can only enter our unique and captivating world, and enjoy the magic of Hollywood.