Here are some of the Twitter tweets about the Joker film, which reflect superficial and frightening ignorance:

"The composition of the characters is complex, and at the same time creates superficiality and naivety."

Do you understand something from the sentence? Similar to delirium drug users.

"The Joker is supposed to be directed by DC because they know it."

This thinks that DC, the company that produces Batman's comics and films, is human!

A third speaks of "a terrifying depth and that the story is tied to any social and mental-psychological subject."

Do you understand anything?

The fourth speaks of "the strong rationalization of criminal transformation."

What is the difference between this phrase and “chemistry of physics”, for example? Do you understand either statement? At least my last author!

We have classical phrases: "school scenario," and "strong scenario."

Truth: Absolutely not a school because it borrowed from schools, not strong because it does not add new.

"He doesn't feel like watching ordinary movies after the Joker," he says.

The Joker is a very ordinary film, if we look at it outside the context of comics.

"The Joker director made comedy films," he tweeted.

FACT: All filmmakers in the world are somehow influenced by legend Alfred Hitchcock.

In addition to what I said last week, Warner's announcement that it was not responsible for Joker's actions in the film and distancing herself from the violence of the film helped greatly promote it, as well as the security anticipation associated with its screening, all exaggerated and used to promote it.

Everyone has the right to express their opinions in any film and the opinion is not criticism.

The problem is when the people of opinion speak in the language of critics in the unjustified reincarnation of the critic's character, and here everything is distorted, and turns into nonsense in the tweets above.

The movie "Joker" split and stirred controversy and this does not concern us, but it caused the dazzling of a very large segment of the inexperienced audience, which is abundant on Twitter. The film came with a new unusual vision in the context of comics, but it is not new for character or crime films. In other words: The Joker offers nothing more than a performance.

Comic-lovers watched the film, and because their expertise was narrow and unfamiliar with crime films, they thought they had seen something new that had never happened before. This 5% of the audience was followed by the remaining 95% of the moviegoers, and that's exactly what we meant by the herd mentality. What helped these views spread was the presence of Twitter with a thumb of a thumb.

We have an intellectual vacuum, cultural shallowness and ignorance of the cinematic history of the masses.

Singers write opinions to prove their presence on the podium, and to increase the number of followers, and everything that was said about the film in tweets does not reach the rate of 1%. I sat Americans, English, French, and others who write in the cinema, and I sat Bouarab, but I did not find them ignorant. In short: Bouarab did not watch movies in their lives, so impressed by the Joker!

Abdulla.AlQamzi@emaratalyoum.com

To read the previous articles of the writer please click on its name .

We have an intellectual vacuum, cultural shallowness and ignorance of the cinematic history of the masses, and we have a crisis of Arab criticism.