On Sundays, because we are partying, we extend our desktop until mid afternoon. Sometimes we replace the nap with a gathering, but that determines, in addition to the dream, the force of the present. Whether or not we get hooked on the chat will depend on the mood of the Tertullians, because there are those who do not even drunk get out of Sanchez or the Diada .

Luckily, last Sunday we talked at polyamory's house. Thus, in italics, to give it a word character. The initiative was taken by one of my daughters-in-law. Convinced that it would be an intimate confession, we were all expectant and elated. I even dried my mouth before starting.

I don't know if you know anything about polyamory that invades us . Don't answer me now. Do it after advertising.

The word polyamory has a technical euphony, uninhabited with intention. You say polyamory and it's like you say polytrauma. I remember these days Lady Di , whose death has turned 22 years. She talked about polyamory without naming it. Interviewed on the BBC, she said a phrase that became a symbol given the situation she was going through. "Three are a crowd," said Lady Di, laying the eyes of a slaughtered lamb. She did not refer to a reality marked by two simultaneous loves, but to a simple adultery (her husband cheated on her with Camila Parker ). In Catalan we say "make the jump". You skip the template husband to sleep with "other." It is a very appropriate term for riders.

There are quite a few couples who put polyamory in their life. For that you need simultaneity and consensus. The relationship is three (or three hundred) and they all agree. The most common polyamory form is that of three: the couple plus a support command. With everything that sociologists, psychologists and anthropologists say, polyamory is not to speak it but to do it .

An actress whose name I do not want to remember, publicly confessed that her marriage had passed a bump that was reinforced because her husband and she had incorporated a polyamory into their lives. There was a time (60s and 70s) when orgies were practiced. The orgy differed from polyamory quantitatively and qualitatively. First, in quantity, because although a specific number of participants was not required ( at that time you are not to take account ) you could always make room for another. And in quality, because the orgy had a sexual character. Polyamory, no. In polyamory, sex is reached by love.

According to the criteria of The Trust Project

Know more

  • Diada
  • Sex

ObituaryAngela Martínez: the last clandestine

The graphic note Do not tell me what to look at

Walking through the villas Everything will happen