The Internet for a long time remained untouched territory and was not regulated in any way. And if something was being done, then it was ridiculous bans from Roskomnadzor. But everything is really simple: the same rules apply on the Internet as everywhere else. Do not think that the law is only about offline.

There are people who do not understand that shitting on the table is bad, they need laws. But while there are no such laws, there will be preventive actions such as the arrest of the blogger Vladislav Sinitsa, the one who “proposed”, “described”, “presented the idea” - whatever you like, in short, said that the children of the security forces may not return home, but a video with a child dismemberment will be sent to their parents. Cool? How to get fucked.

The call to destroy any group of people, and in this case it was a threat to the children (!) Of the security forces, should be punished. And it does not matter what format it was made in - written on a fence, in a book or on Twitter. “Just a tweet” is not an excuse, it is a statement. “Just a tweet” is a description of the form.

The rules on the network are the same as in life: he said - be kind to answer. Threat - it is both in Africa and in blogs a threat, the same with incitement and extremism. Take responsibility, if so brave. Only the brave are few, but there are many who think that, hiding behind a mask of anonymity, a nickname, a pseudonym or an avatar with someone else’s photo, you can do whatever your heart desires (although the question, of course, is what kind of soul people have there).

I don’t want to sit and wonder what a person who writes similar things can do, I don’t want to hope for hope and believe that no one else who read this Tweet of Sinitsa will think about doing the described.

Tit received five years in prison. Was he severely punished? Maybe.

But there is no need here about “it was just a tweet” - he was not sent for just a tweet. Imagine it was written about your child. Imagine that they wrote this to you - and not just on Twitter, but sent a letter, such a paper, an email letter. Will it be scary? So shut up.

I often talk about potential victims of domestic violence and always remember the story of how a woman went to the police, and she was told: “When the body is back, then complain.” That is, in such cases, the actions of law enforcement authorities condemn: they say she warned you, she is scared, help, but when they do the same with a potentially dangerous dude, the story begins that he was imprisoned for just words or just thoughts .

What is the difference between baiting online and offline? Where is the line between intention and deed?

Now, hundreds, thousands of people who believe that they can continue to go unpunished will think before publishing something online. It should have been like this before, but m *** ki for that and m *** ki, so as not to understand this. Unfortunately, permissive measures will not work here, prohibitive ones are needed, although I am not a supporter of such an approach. But if the dude does not understand himself, he needs to explain and punish him if he continues to violate these rules.

We do not live in the Stone Age, and similar, I repeat, even harsh, tough measures are needed. It is they, these boundaries, that allow us to continue to be considered a civilized society, where the matter of honor and reputation is to be responsible for our words.

I believe that very soon the Internet as a sphere will begin to be more legalized (not equally crushed and censored). I want to live in a transparent, understandable world, use the network and know that another shit-eater who will incite and threaten, who will poison me, will pay. For me it is a duty to the child, I have to give my daughter at least a little more secure digital world.

The author’s point of view may not coincide with the position of the publisher.