What readers want to know about the "Field Marshal"!

News from the island

• Watch: We are considering cases against Ben Salman in other countries after Argentina
• Palestine Observer: US draft resolution condemning Hamas targets our entire people
• Bloomberg: Trump's insults to others have consequences
• Hubble is absent from Congress. Angry MPs and the White House deny it
• Houthis target Apache in southern Saudi Arabia

When I started to write the volume I did on the field of Marshal Abdel Hakim Amer I realized that readers are looking for a true image of the life of Abdul Hakim Amer as it was not painted, and they want a clear picture written by a writer capable of seeing and considered the bias and balance also At the same time, human life in the case of Abdul Hakim Amer does not know the balance, this goal requires the author of the biography of Abdul Hakim in four lines make him independent effort to investigate without exclusion, reviewing visions and novels for the truth and not for pluralism, So that the details are not fulfilled in order to prove T. contradiction, leaning on a broad knowledge for understanding not to transcendence.

I remember with pleasure that I began to write the book that readers have been looking for since the end of the last century, specifically in the last year of that century, and I knew that he would torture me but I did not know that my suffering with him would reach what I had reached. I do not think I could escape this heavy duty, which I had to do in the way I did, and I am not satisfied with all the satisfaction, but I am satisfied with the maximum degree of satisfaction possible for me in my current circumstances, sick sick and haunted and expatriate.

We read the history of Abdul Hakim Amer, and we combine the two spirit: the spirit of abstraction of truth, and the spirit of reverence in front of the enormity of the atmosphere of human epic in his life, in the form of major battles, even if the inner feelings that the perception of some truth would have been in need of other atmosphere of And the hum of the soldiers does not stop, while the voices of the leaders of their soldiers almost fade in the midst of this thunderous roar of gunshots, movements of forces, and the whizzing of planes, and the winds of wars that do not keep.

No one can blame the defeat of 1967 on Abdel Hakim Amer alone, as did the Nasserite regime. Nasser was the first official, the first to declare war, and whatever was said that he did so only with the consent of Abdul Hakim Amer , It is a statement condemning Abdel Nasser greater conviction, although such a statement would be enough to close a small hole in the door of discussion aimed at achieving the right and hold this responsibility.

The Nasserites discovered that the political discourse after the defeat of 1967 can not exceed the responsibility for this defeat, pay attention to more than enough to load Abdul Hakim this responsibility, and to distort his image to ensure that the defeat is synonymous with his behavior and preoccupation and neglect .. Etc. The image of Abdel Hakim Amer is still distorted by this Nasserite insistence on distortion. You can discover the Nazareth tendency in any book or historical text through the position he takes towards Abdul Hakim Amer, that the demolition of Abdul Hakim Amer and the demolition of his character became the only justification for the survival of Nasiriyah. Without this justification, Nasiriyah recognizes its collapse.

The October 1973 war removed the responsibility of the armed forces for the defeat of 1967. President Sadat's speech in the People's Assembly on October 16, 1973, conveyed the clear meaning and phrases in acquitting the armed forces of responsibility for the defeat. Here is a facet of irony that wrote the word of those who had written the speeches of Abdel Nasser, which dealt in a mysterious way Abdul Hakim Amer responsibility for defeat, but the Nasserite discourse in the loading Abdul Hakim Amer responsibility for defeat continued, even if dragged with him, of course the responsibility of the leaders of the armed forces .

Then came the eighties and emerged false claims that attributed the victory of October 1973 to Abdel Nasser, but it is arbitrary not talk about the acquittal Abdul Hakim Amer of some responsibility for the defeat, but focused on the accusation and repeated accusation in a multiple interview of attempts to eliminate Nasser, 1973 automatically or coincidentally such as the theory of the big bang that created the universe in which we live a coincidence, a theory that was the ultra-Communists and still admire and chant.

In any case, the identification of the culprit and responsible for the defeat of 1967 between Abdel Nasser and Abdel Hakim Amer has become in itself a problematic of the problems of contemporary history, despite the obvious right in the case, that Abdel Nasser bear the presence of Abdul Hakim Amer to make him a pawn of his mistakes, Hakim Amer bear the power of Nasser to make him a protector of the advantages .. And that these two reasons and thanks to them occurred the biggest defeat known by Egypt in its history.

The theater movement in the life of Abdul Hakim Amer has long and ramified in many contradictory paths, until he had to end his death or death or sacrifice by the leader, who spent his life a life of his sincere and his ambition

communication Web-sites

If one does not define his position on this great issue (at least between himself and himself), he will continue to be devoid of conscience and confused. He finds himself obliged to receive the life of Abdul Hakim Amer, as seen by those who saw that their innocence and existence could only be condemned by Abdel Hakim, , And that this condemnation and that demonization extend to everything in Abdel Hakim Amer. But the simple simple man can contemplate the life of Abdul Hakim until May 1967, and then assume (in controversy) that he died before the closure of the Straits, and then he will find that Abdul Hakim until that time was greater than all the kings in the glory he lived and the influence he acquired, His image is no less than that he lived his life as a creator and a new one, and he recognized all that.

But the most oppressive man of reality will find that all the glory that Abdul Hakim Amer lived until 1966 was a phenomenon that covered the suffering of another kind that was established in 1956, then in Damascus 1961 and then in Yemen since 1962. We are facing a very contradictory contradiction, perhaps The difficulty of interpreting what represented the defeat of 1967, which was in its appearance and within one thing, and was not double-faced and apparent as the three sisters who preceded them to exist:

- Tripartite aggression and the invented victory in 1956, which developed to portray him as a political victory and a military defeat.

- The rapid separation in September 1961 with a coup from the Office of the Field Marshal himself, and it was portrayed as a conspiracy did not succeed, while the plot and is still the cause of all calamities to this day.

- The prolonged defeat in Yemen in 1962, and even after the death of Marshal himself, but it is still conceived as a war of liberation or revolutionary support.

The fact is that the theatrical movement in the life of Abdel Hakim Amer has long and ramified in many contradictory paths, so that he must have ended his death or death or sacrifice at the hands of the leader who spent his life a life of his life and his ambition.