What can we benefit from Karl Marx?

News from the island

• Does the Argentine judiciary achieve with Mohammed bin Salman?
• Ben Salman attacked and visited Assad .. Tunisian journalists angry at their captain
• Palestine Observer: US draft resolution condemning Hamas targets our entire people
• Watch: We are considering cases against Ben Salman in other countries after Argentina
• Bloomberg: Trump's insults to others have consequences

There is no doubt that Karl Marx was one of the greatest philosophers who left behind a heated debate and a noisy debate. Marx's ghost still reverberates through the capitalist system despite its dominance and the fall of all competing communist experiences, whose repertoire derives from Marx's theses. Perhaps the one who returned the "capital" to the forefront is some of the economic crises that hit the modern economic system from time to time, and perhaps the most recent crisis in 2008. This is what drives us to search for the secret of this constant presence, and the question about the addition of Marx to get this presence?

It is true that all forms of socialism today have become part of the past, and the liberal Western model has become the focus of everyone's attention and the amount of their aspirations to reach its developmental, political and economic level. But all this does not bring Marx to the margin next to those failed socialist experiments, and the fall of the latter may refer to a lack of predictions and some perceptions that may have reached a high level of idealism, but they do not drop the effectiveness of the "approach" which led to the conclusion of these narratives and theses.

The confusion that occurred at Rahat is greater than our belief that the fall of historical experiences is a declaration of inadequacies in the "theory" that produced these narratives. This is confirmed by Abdullah al-Arawi that socialism is not always Marxism, and yet it is still mixed in the minds of the socialist people, which is a set of political, social and moral goals. And Marxism which is a way to analyze social, economic and historical phenomena (1).

Therefore, Marx's importance does not lie in the conceptual concepts of the instrument through his reflections in the process of reality and complexities, nor in predictions formulated to achieve the desired. Indeed, Marx's power is reflected in the approach on which he was based to deduce his thesis. That is why it was the successful socialist experiments that tried to adapt the curriculum to its reality. Here we recall Lenin's experience and NEP and Mao policy in China, as opposed to other experiments, including Stalin. And so we have realized that the new Marx was his method of analysis, but this answer prompts us to ask again what is this approach?

Marxism is a method of analysis and theory for an "open" understanding of reality and solutions to its problems through awareness of its various contradictions and components. Among the mechanisms of this approach we find (the material debate), which plays the role of the guide in the search process in fact to consciousness of his realism. The controversy is not the work of Marx, but one of Hegel's discoveries, but the credit for its development is due to the first rather than the second. Hegel's argument was to examine the process of ideas rather than reality.

While Marx imposed attention on the material "reality" not thought, because the latter is a reflection of the former. In other words, Marxism in its materialistic approach took on the polemic of its mental nucleus, and rejected its mystical reflection, which refers to the active factor in social life to "absolute spirit". Thus, the force of Marxism and its vision lies in the fact that Hegel stopped his feet and went to its end. If Hegel was a negation of the philosophers that preceded him and the logical end of them, Marx denied negation by modifying the Hegelian controversy, thus bringing the controversy to a complete conclusion. . But what is the advantage of this new logic about the old logic that prevailed?

There is no doubt that Marx's approach was the basis for a qualitative transformation, because by virtue of this, the way of thinking was based on a tangible situation (human beings, relations, production ...), thus abandoning the transcendence of philosophy and its contemplations, to delve into the real existence and the movement of reality and its changes and contradictions. Marx's deep saying: "It is not the awareness of people who determine their existence, but their existence that determines their consciousness." This physical dialectical logic was contrary to what humanity has always done before. The Aristotelian logic, which relies on silence and measurement, dominated a prior idea, and its problem is that it does not represent the reality of life. The man of thought became influenced by this logic. He does not understand the problems of life and does not want to think about them ... He is a futuristic thought looking at the ending things (4). It also gives priority to consciousness not reality. But seeks to overthrow the ideas of a rigid image on any reality placed in front of him, regardless of contradictions.

All in all, it is possible to shorten the words and say that the new Marx lies in its establishment of a dialectical, materialistic logic as a superior way of thinking of seeking to consciousness of reality and of being aware of its becoming a scientific answer. It is not the political, social, and ethical aims of socialism, but the materialistic dialectical approach adopted in the analysis based on the primacy of reality on consciousness, because realism is the real reality, the mental state They are actually assumed hypothetical. There is no doubt that what is required is the awareness of the real being to be only a mental process that contributes to determining that process. Thus the physical vision is open. (5)

References:
1 Abdullah al-Arawi, The West and Historical Thought, p.89.
(2), (5) integrity of the clergy, material argument.
(3) the integrity of the mass, the debate and the physical perception in history.
(4) Ali Pink, the farce of the human mind.