In the West, the ideology of racial and sexual inequality is rapidly gaining strength and repressive tooling. She even received the special name “positive discrimination”. The followers of this cult proceed from the principle of collective responsibility and blame all discriminatory practices of the past used in the framework of colonization, slavery, segregation, patriarchy, homophobia, to a white heterosexual man who is universally subject to so-called positive discrimination.
In fact, if you clear an extremely specific discourse of supporters of positive discrimination (self-S-JEWS) from verbal tinsel, equipped with a colossal amount of pseudoscientific terminology, it turns out that this is a very simple thing - a banal revenge. The traditional male majority must be responsible for all the true or imaginary resentment and oppression, being defeated in rights in comparison with those who suffered in the distant or not very distant past. The victims are women and racial minorities. If we take the most radical of the described doctrines, they are obliged to repay a lot of what they experienced by subjecting the aforementioned peasant with traditional views on the relationship of the sexes to ostracism and humiliation.
If you think that this is the most radical form of political correctness, then this is no longer the case. The most extreme ideas have become mainstream in the world of culture. The consequence of this is the introduction of the most severe censorship on the cultural heritage of the past. For example, the dramas of Shakespeare, the novels of Mark Twain, fairy tales of the peoples of the world, where traces of sexism, homophobia and racism are easily found, are subjected to merciless castration or correction. Characters of works of art in the film version or in theatrical productions change the gender, skin color, some of their dialogues are mercilessly stamped out or rewritten in accordance with the most severe norms of political correctness. In reprints of works of previous centuries, in place of designations, which are now considered offensive, put conditionally neutral. Such a fate befell the "Adventures of Tom Sawyer" by Mark Twain. The word “negro” was removed from the book, replacing it with the word “slave”.
Over the past two years, all four stories about an American boy have been removed from libraries of several states. There are calls to impose a total ban on the work.
In the coordinate system of political correctness, the Venetian Merchant is considered a model of anti-Semitism, and Hamlet is an example of sexism and racial hatred. Goes to the nuts and Russian writers. In her excellent study, Elena Kushner quotes one of the Western bloggers as saying: “Leo Tolstoy, I'm glad you're dead.
His wife Sophia rewrote Hand and Peace eight times, bore him thirteen children, and helped publish books about the women he slept with while they were married (Resurrection). And yes, she was angry when he wanted to leave the estate to his strange cult, and not to provide for her and the children (and she certainly could have killed him, although we don’t know for sure). ”
In the West, a very impressive list of politically incorrect books has already been compiled, which includes works by the greatest writers of the past and present. The rewriting of the past was firmly established in cultural life, and the liberal Western intelligentsia organically got into the role of a ruthless censor who is ready to tear the cultural heritage apart. If this is the case with the classics who have always been considered inviolable, then any actual statement is under much more ferocious supervision.
Sexual minorities, oppressed racial and ethnic groups in the past, women are recognized as subjects with preferential rights, who must rely on the guilt complex implanted by the traditional male white majority in order to restore parity. In fact, we are talking about a total uprising against the forms of social life, about relations between people who were the basis of life for all historical societies. This concerns the family, the concept of the field as an identity granted by the Lord, which a person cannot change on a whim. These values are overturned. Instead, they are triumphed by the idea of gender, that is, gender, which the human being constructs on his own, depending on his sexual preferences.
As for racial positive discrimination, it is a slightly veiled Nazism, arguing that a white man can never atone for a black man because he is by his nature or genetics simply unable to realize the enormity of his ancestors. But the head and the conscience are not so.
This new ideology is so merciless and soon to be punished, that Hollywood, the theater world, the book industry, universities, and the entire intellectual elite of the West as a whole, have long been laid out for it. The dictatorship of political correctness, of course, differs for the better from the Nazi doctrine, since it does not offer to send the historically guilty white man to the gas chambers of Auschwitz. But, in essence, considering the aforementioned man forever crucified on the cross of collective guilt, she recognizes him as being of the second human kind, who has only one right: to repent and repent again.
The point of view of the author may not coincide with the position of the editorial board.