Between Abdel Nasser and Sisi .. What exactly changed ?!

News from the island

• Bolton: Trump will not meet Mohammed bin Salman in Argentina
• Deportation threatens Syrian wanted refugees in Algeria
• Washington hinders international resolution on famine in Yemen
• Trump again doubts his intelligence assessment of Khashoggi's death
• Israeli diplomat: Deal of the century was completed and announced the beginning of 2019

Perhaps the similarity of the scene makes you say that history repeats itself, why not the year of God in his land "and do not find our transformation. " In the past was Pharaoh, Aaron and Haman and yesterday was Nasser, Mubarak and Sisi and his soldiers. Since the coup d'état of Sisi in July 2013 and many political analysts and opinion leaders believe that this coup is very similar to the coup d'état 52 and that Sisi takes the steps of Nasser, but we will not make a detailed comparison between two systems or between two coups, both of which caused destruction and ruin on Egypt, From the era of Abdel Nasser to Sisi.

It is true that the parties to the conflict are still the same as the military and with them the institutions of the state on the one hand and the Brotherhood joined by the youth of the revolution and the rest of the Islamic currents on the other, but see who benefited from the mistakes of the past and has the tools he did not have before ?! In the literature of the Muslim Brotherhood, they call it "the ordeal." This time, the conflict has radically different. The reasons and results that led to it remain the predominance of those who understand the past, the present and plans for the future.

The regime in the Nasser era had all the tools that make the right void and falsehood. The army, the police and the judiciary, as it is now, in addition to the media and in full and thus had the street and the public opinion that did not know what was happening even during the war. The Egyptian army was hit by the news of Abdel Nasser talking about strikes to the enemy, but now perhaps the situation is very different, it is true that the Sisi possesses media outlets with great potential but do not guarantee and do not sing hunger, and at the same time he does not have that means the full form that was It is owned by Abdel Nasser E does not do evil while the Brotherhood went for the first time to own the means of what they found greatness impact.

This means that the Brotherhood was too late to catch up with is not limited to a television channel or a daily newspaper or magazine or radio station, but became a large space is the cyberspace in which all swim, but the military has not yet been able to control this space, although it was One of the reasons for the fall of the Mubarak regime and their experience is limited, unlike the Brotherhood and the youth of the revolution, who had only this space before the January Revolution. On the other hand, the influence of the opposition media has become much stronger and stronger than the regular media, which has fed the people from lying, misleading and dictating it.

The second thing is the extent of the people's awareness of themselves. The people live reality every day and if they try to inform the regime, they are absent from the minds and falsify the facts. This consciousness was not born purely coincidental, but the result of technological progress and technological development and different generations, new generations became more aware of the generation of the fifties, which had only newspapers, radio and television, all were in the grip of the system alone and there was no room to hear another voice.

Among the fundamental differences is the spread of Islamists and their influence on the Egyptian street throughout these years. In the era of Nasser, all the Brotherhood was arrested and they were the only Islamic faction active on the scene. There were only a few people in the detention camps except for the Muslim Brotherhood. The Brotherhood is in prison, and the Brotherhood does not exceed 50 percent.

In order to know how much influence we have to follow the Egyptian street now, with the disappearance of the Islamic trend from the scene appeared many strange problems and phenomena on our societies, for example the decline of religious and escape from anything related to religion related to the lack of accusation of brotherhood and also some secularists dare to call for the prevention of the veil Removing the veil, permitting and promoting homosexuality and spreading the waves of atheism. All this makes us feel the role played by the Islamic trend to stand immune to these calls.

Sisi has more means and capabilities than Nasser's, but he has not succeeded in exploiting them, which makes him a leader like Nasser, whom the people still glorify despite the crimes he committed against the homeland

European News Agency

On the other hand, the Brotherhood's external presence has become apparent. It has become influential in the decisions of some countries and in the decision-making circles in other countries. It is not completely complete control, but it is a presence and a noticeable spread that did not exist before. Advocates of human rights and democracy in the West and America.

It is true that the Muslim Brotherhood pays the price of the leader in the scene and the people pay the price of silence for treason, but everyone finally pays. The price. Ironically, Nasser also took care of the tangible achievement on the ground, which the vast majority of the people would touch. He was cut off from the rich to give the poor the right to rally the people around him, while this system did not succeed even in providing a living and working hard to increase the poor. "Many thanks".

So there is a qualitative development in the possession of the means by the Brotherhood makes them more steadfast this time, prolonging the conflict and making many expect their return to the scene quickly. On the other hand, al-Sisi has more means and capabilities than Nasser's, but he did not succeed in exploiting them, which makes him a leader like Nasser, whom the people still glorify despite the crimes he committed against the country. The conflict is still ongoing and the battle has not yet ended and perhaps one side over the other to use the means available to him and perhaps the means of the other party the cause of the defeat and fall.