Chinanews.com, Beijing, November 25th (Reporter Wang Qingkai and Yang Jiaqi) The report "Choose one of the two" for the urban new generation's job-housing balance released by the recruitment platform 51job on the 25th shows that 53.51% of the surveyed urban new generation of people choose to prioritize quality of life over work, time and convenience are the reasons why the new urban generation are more willing to spend money.
The report shows that nearly 90% of professionals are experiencing burnout caused by stress related to the workplace, work experience and personal life.
More and more new generations choose to prioritize the quality of life over work, and they place more importance on "job-living balance".
The survey shows that the new urban generation shows a "dual personality" in the choice of "job-housing balance".
On the one hand, compared with the "996 but high-paying" jobs, more urban new generations tend to work with the average urban salary but can work from 9 to 5. At the same time, the urban new generation has a higher preference for flexible working systems than traditional The working hour system is 13.02%.
Employment opportunities are more distributed in the city center or the core area of the city sub-center, and the rent of surrounding houses is relatively high, while living in low-rent houses far away from the core area means longer commuting.
The survey shows that when rent and commuting time cannot be combined, more (53.51%) of the new urban generation are more willing to choose high rent for short commuting.
Among them, the proportion of people aged 26 to 30 who choose "high rent and short commute" is the highest, and due to greater life and family pressure, the proportion of people aged 36 to 40 who choose "low rent and long commute" is the highest .
For the same consideration, when the rental price and supporting facilities cannot be achieved at the same time, more (53.04%) urban new generations are willing to choose high rents near business districts.
The survey found that the "Wanger Coefficient" (the ratio of rent expenditure to disposable income) of the urban new generation of all ages is greater than 30.0%, and the actual rent-to-salary ratio of the urban new generation is on average 6.11% higher than the ideal state.
Among them, the difference between reality and ideal between the ages of 36 and 40 is the highest, reaching 8.36%.
(Finish)