According to an official report, "between 25% and 42%" of employees who could claim unemployment insurance do not use it.

The document notes that this proportion is “comparable” to that observed on other social benefits.

This report indicates that this non-use “has been little studied” and remains a “difficult to measure” phenomenon.

The study, unveiled by

Les Echos

, runs from November 2018 to October 2019;

either before the health crisis and the last unemployment insurance reform.

The authors point out that they have faced several difficulties, including the fact that the administrative data "do not make it possible to observe the condition of effective job search" or the fact that "approximately one third of people with an end of contract are already covered" by unemployment insurance due to their previous contracts.

A majority of employees on temporary contracts

They specify that "depending on the scope and assumptions used, the estimate of the rate of non-use of people not registered with Pôle Emploi in the year following the end of their contract varies between 25% and 42%, which represents on one year between 390,000 and 690,000 non-users”.

According to the central hypothesis of the report, "about 30% of people aged 25 to 60 experience the end of their contract in the private sector without first being registered with Pôle Emploi and fulfilling the eligibility criteria do not use insurance unemployment ".

The authors note that the non-use of unemployment insurance is thus “close” to that observed for other benefits, citing the rates of “34% for the RSA”, “32% for pensions”.

The study also notes that employees who do not use unemployment insurance “are not very different” from those who do in terms of age, sex or socio-professional category.

On the other hand, three specificities are pointed out: employees on temporary contracts (temporary and fixed-term contracts) use “significantly less” unemployment insurance than employees at the end of their permanent contracts.

Non-Applicants also worked shorter hours than Appellants, their potential rights being therefore “weaker”.

Finally, non-users find a job more quickly than users.

Lack of information or solicitation

Regarding the grounds for non-appeal, the document puts forward "two main families of explanation": the "lack of information" and the "lack of solicitation".

In the first case, employees may have doubts about their eligibility.

In the second, it may be an unfavorable cost/benefit trade-off: “fear of stigmatization, administrative procedures, checks, etc.

»



This report, produced by the Department of Statistics of the Ministry of Labor (Dares) with economists, had been provided for by the law on the "freedom to choose one's professional future" of 2018 which planned to be submitted to Parliament "within two years”.

Since then, elected officials had expressly requested its publication, like François Ruffin (LFI), who had accused the government of “censoring” this document ahead of the presidential election.

Policy

National Assembly: A first lively debate on the reform of unemployment insurance

Economy

Employment: Will the reform of unemployment insurance be the spark of the social return?

  • Unemployment insurance

  • Unemployment

  • employment center

  • Use

  • Company

  • Economy