Following the "fake bird's nest incident", Simba was once again involved in the vortex of selling fakes, and this time it was his apprentice Dandan who was questioned.

　　On April 22, the YPL brand publicly questioned Dandan selling fake products in the live broadcast room, and sold more than 100,000 pieces at a price of 63 yuan per piece, and the illegal sales amount exceeded 6 million yuan.

　　Xinxuan’s official Weibo issued a statement in response, saying that the product is not a fake, and it was caused by disputes before and after the transfer of the trademark.

　　The Red Star Capital Bureau noticed that at present, the YPL brand party stated in the latest statement that the trademark obtained by the relevant company is one type, but the trademark used for the infringing goods sold by Dandan in the live broadcast room is another, which means that Dandan sells goods. Still fake.

　　On April 22, the certified Blue V Weibo user @YPL Sports Trends issued a statement saying that on the evening of April 18, they received complaints from relevant channels, and a product called "YPL Sunscreen Cool Pants" was launched on April 18. Illegal sales in the live broadcast room of Kuaishou anchor Dandan.

"It has been confirmed that this product is not officially authorized and does not belong to the YPL brand."

　　The statement stated that, considering the huge sales volume and amount of the product, YPL will hold the product distribution company and production company accountable in accordance with the law, and safeguard its legitimate rights and interests through legal means.

　　According to the official website of the YPL brand, it is an Australian functional sports brand. It has created popular products such as puppy pants and AI pants, with annual sales of 2 million to 3 million pieces.

　　That night, the certified Weibo user Xinxuan’s official Weibo issued the first statement saying that he had launched an emergency inspection, and the relevant party (Harbin Aoshengyuan Trading Co., Ltd.) provided him with the brand authorization link and written materials, and his Further rigorous verification of the material is underway.

　　On the morning of April 23, Xinxuan's official Weibo issued a second statement saying that after further verification, it was found that the incident was caused by disputes before and after the trademark transfer and was not a fake.

　　Based on the statements of both parties, the reporter found that the fact that both parties recognized was that the YPL trademark had been transferred.

　　At the beginning of April this year, the original owner of the trademark, Australian Health Industry Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Australia Health Products Company"), transferred the relevant trademarks to Australia YPL Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "YPL Company").

　　Xin Xuan's official Weibo said in a statement that on January 1, 2021, Kazakhstan Trading Company was authorized by Aojian Production Company to have the right to produce, sell, use and promote the YPL trademark. The authorization period is 2021.01.01-2026.12. 31, and a transferable license.

　　The statement also stated that there was a dispute between Aojian and YPL over granting a third party the use of the trademark before and after the transfer, so YPL said that the products promoted in Dandan’s live broadcast room “do not belong to the products of the YPL brand”.

　　"After consulting legal experts, Xin Xuan confirmed that the authorization relationship between Aojian Production Company and Kazakhstan Trading Company, as well as the authorization relationship between Kazakhstan Trading Company and Xin Xuan, are within the validity period of the law." The statement promised that customer service will still assist consumers in handling full refund.

　　However, in the early morning of April 23, @YPL Sports Chaopin also issued a statement again, saying that the trademark obtained by Kazakhstan Trading Company is one kind, but the infringing goods sold by Dandan in the live broadcast room use another kind of trademark.

　　In response to this question, on April 23, the Red Star Capital Bureau sent interview questions to relevant persons of Guangzhou Xinxuan Network Information Technology Co., Ltd. The other party said that these questions need to be answered by their lawyers, and now the lawyers are communicating with the brand side .

　　As of press time, the Red Star Capital Bureau has not received an official reply.

Chengdu Business Daily-Red Star News reporter Yang Peiwen