Chinanews client, Beijing, March 18 (Reporter Xie Yiguan) In real life, the "light-legged artifact" is a must-have for many girls in their wardrobes.
However, the China Consumers Association conducted a comparative test on 25 panty stockings on the market and found that all samples had snagging.
According to the China Consumers Association, samples of 25 pantyhose stockings were purchased online. The sales platforms involved are Tmall, JD.com, Vipshop, Netease Yanxuan, Pinduoduo, Xiaohongshu, etc. The sample prices range from 3.29 yuan per pair. The price ranges from 40.9 yuan, and the color is mainly skin color and black.
The 25 samples involved 19 domestic brands, and the 6 samples did not have a brand on the product packaging.
Screenshot from China Consumers Association.
Because of the straight and lateral extensibility of the socks, the wearing comfort is affected.
The test results show that one of the 25 samples has a very low hip extension value, which is almost impossible to wear. It is an 0D art ultra-thin open pantyhose with a nominal trademark of JOHN.
The greater the elongation and recovery rate of the sock, the greater the elasticity, that is, the better the elasticity of the sock, it is not easy to deform, it is not easy to fall off when walking, and it has high durability.
After testing, the 25 sample fabrics have significant differences in elongation and recovery rate. Only 5 pantyhose samples have good elasticity, and the evaluation of elongation and recovery rate is above 3 stars.
There are also many problems with the labeling of samples.
The fiber content is one of the important factors that determine the value of the product. The results show that the fibers in the instep part of the 25 panty stockings are composed of different content of nylon and spandex. Among them, the fiber content of 3 samples has a large deviation from the actual measured value. There are also 8 samples that do not clearly indicate the fiber composition and content.
It is worth mentioning that among the 25 samples, 6 samples have no product names, 5 samples have no trademarks, and some samples have no Chinese trademarks, making it difficult for consumers to identify them.
The specifications and models of the products have different marking forms because there is no uniform requirement. Some marking positions are on the certificate, some are marked on the package, and some are marked on the sock card, etc., which are not easy to be found.
In actual wear, consumers often encounter situations where the panty stockings are hooked or even broken by nails or other sharp objects.
There are often merchants in the market claiming that their products are anti-snagging.
The screenshot is from the China Consumers Association report.
However, the experimental results showed that 25 samples all had different degrees of snagging phenomenon, and 11 samples were snagged, which is far from the snagging damage claimed by some merchants.
Among them, the nominal trademark is Pierre Cardin's 3-pack 1D micro-compression arbitrary cut pineapple socks, the nominal commodity WILLIAM&KATE's 10D anti-snagging silk bikini pantyhose, and the nominal trademark Langsha 4-pack core-spun silk splicing crotch. The anti-snagging performance of pantyhose is the worst.
(Finish)