Let's go over this with reporter Jeong Ho-sun of the Ministry of Economy.

Q. Listed price realization, eventually a tax bomb?

[Reporter Jeong Ho-seon: Currently, we are pushing for a plan to raise the official price from 50 to 70% to 90% in stages by 2030. In fact, the official price, which has the greatest impact on people's lives, is adjusted to the market price according to the original meaning of price, Tax equity is not wrong.

However, the larger the difference in the public announcement price, the more expensive houses benefit.

There may be side effects of lowering the effective tax rate, so it may be some normalization process.

In the process, however, there is a problem that the tax burden is greatly increased, such as one real-time homeowner who does not have a speculative purpose, an elderly retiree who does not have additional income, and a middle-low-priced home.

Therefore, even if the public price is realized, the shock of excessive tax charges must be resolved through other methods such as tax rate adjustment.]

Q. Disagreement over the cut standard, why?

[Reporter Jung Ho-seon: In fact, the controversy right now is that political calculations are at play.

From the perspective of the ruling party, we want to expand the relief of the tax burden most by targeting the votes of the Seoul voters ahead of the by-election of the mayor of Seoul next year.

The Blue House and the government have a real problem that requires a lot of cash to be paid by the central government when local government tax revenues decrease.

In fact, some local heads of local governments are very opposed to the lack of tax revenue.

It also seems to have contributed to the concern that widening the target for the reduction could give the real estate market a bit of a false signal toward easing real estate policy.]

Q. What is the problem when expanding to 900 million?

[Reporter Jung Ho-sun: The standard for charging the final tax is 900 million.

However, if the mid-low price is set at 900 million, it can cause confusion in the overall real estate tax.

In other words, it breaks down the high-priced housing baseline that the government adhered to.

And now, as a borderline dilemma, for an extreme example, 899 million won is a tax reduction, and 911 million won is a tax reduction, that is, some issues of equity can be raised enough between the same high-priced housing.

And above all, it can be pointed out the problem that the market's confidence in the policy is lowered due to repeated fatigue and political noise from the real estate policy.] 

▶ "Waiting for a contract," the maximum increase in 5 years

▶ '600 million won vs 900 million' property tax relief pain ...

Even policies come and go