<Anchor>

Repulsion continues to emerge in various places over the June 17 real estate policy. It is pointed out that it is necessary to stop tinkering in this way and to worry about the policy direction.

Reporter Seongjin Jung.

<Reporter>

Those who plan to move into this apartment in Siheung, Gyeonggi-do, who will move in from August 1st, are not the only ones concerned.

When I moved in, I expected to receive a mortgage loan up to 70% of the market price, and made a funding plan. The loan limit was reduced to 50% of the market price as it became a target area for adjustment on June 17th.

[Gimduchan / Shiheung ○○ prospective tenants apartments: how to prepare the balance an additional 100 million a month just because the need to better prepare for the additional 100 million will see that in fact]

government is consistently applied in the past real estate measures Although it is a standard, it is difficult to convince contractors who have fallen out of fire right away.

In Seo-gu, Incheon, where Geomdan New City is located, I even went to the local district lawmakers and asked the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport to adjust the loan limit.

The city of Anseong, Yangju, and Uijeongbu sent virtual protests to the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport saying that the inclusion of regulated areas was unfair.

In Anseong alone, the rate of increase in house prices in the previous three months is lower than that of Gimpo, which is out of regulation, and the amount of unsold housing is substantial, but it is impossible to understand why it was included.

[Anseong City Hall officials: Anseong is not an area where there is a possibility of overheating, but it is unreasonable to tie it all together (to a regulated area).]

The June 17 countermeasures have raised public appeals against the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport's policy that some citizens of Gimpo and Paju, whose housing prices have recently been struck by balloon effects, could be tied down to regulated areas next month.

Civic groups have pointed out that tinkering is a fundamental problem.

[Lee Kang-Hoon/Executive Commissioner, Participatory Solidarity, People's Welfare Hope Headquarters: In the direction of real people through strict regulations, such as greatly strengthening the holding tax (for multi-homeowners) and reforming the publicly announced price system… .]

It seems necessary to re-examine whether the current real estate measures are correct.