Through the June 17th measures, the government decided to give the right to pre-sale only if the reconstruction members lived for more than two years in speculative overheating areas such as Seoul.

Members who fail to meet the two-year residency requirement are expected to disqualify their membership due to strong measures to disqualify them.

Currently, the reconstruction business grants homeowners membership, regardless of whether they live or not.

This allows any homeowner to qualify as a member and receive a pre-sale rebuild at a relatively low price.

For this reason, reconstruction is used as a means of investment in addition to the purpose of improving the residential environment of real residents.

In order to prevent such restructuring from being transformed into a means of speculation, the government has decided to allow the application of pre-sale only to members who have lived for more than two years in the reconstruction of the metropolitan speculation overheating district.

The calculation period for the two-year period is from the start of ownership of the currently owned home until the application for the sale of a member.

Even if it is not two consecutive years, you can fill in the total two years of residence.

The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport is planning to apply this principle from the first application for the application for the establishment of a union after the revision of the Urban and Residential Environment Improvement Act in December of this year.

Due to the relatively old and uncomfortable residential environment, there are many owners who do not actually live in apartments due to the relatively old and uncomfortable residential environment. It's possible.

Because of this, a backlash from owners who do not meet the residency requirements is expected.

In addition, there is a possibility that the reconstruction of many of the complexes will be disrupted.

It is expected that some owners will either move to the apartment to be rebuilt to meet the two-year residency requirement, or to give up the sale of the reconstruction and turn it into a sale.

If this happens, it is expected that some of the complexes will pass the safety diagnosis in recent years, and the complexes in the early stages of reconstruction in Mok-dong, Seoul, which have high expectations for business promotion, will be hit.

In this measure, the government also decided to strengthen the reconstruction safety diagnosis procedure.

The agency for selecting and managing the primary safety diagnosis, which is the first gateway for reconstruction promotion, is changed from the current city, county, or city to the city or road, and the subject of the second safety diagnosis is also replaced by the city, county, or city.

This is because there are cases in which safety diagnosis agencies selected by local governments are easily exposed to complaints, which can disrupt independent work.

We also strengthen sanctions against stale safety inspection agencies.

Currently, if a safety diagnosis report is made false, there are penalties for imprisonment for not more than two years in prison, but there are no penalties for creating a report.

The question was raised as to whether the follow-up management of the safety diagnosis report was being done properly.

In the future, if the safety diagnosis report is poorly prepared, a fine (20 million won) will be charged, and if a false or insolvency is caught, the bidding of the relevant institution will be limited for one year.

Changes to the selection of safety diagnosis organizations and measures to strengthen sanctions for insolvency safety diagnosis organizations are also expected to be implemented in the first half of next year after the revision of the law at the end of the year.

In the case of the second safety diagnosis, measures to strengthen the field investigation are also implemented immediately.

Currently, if an adequacy review is necessary as a result of the first safety diagnosis, an on-site investigation is required, but in many cases, a passive review is conducted mainly for document review because of concerns about conflicts with residents or the like.

In order to improve this, in the future, it is obliged for secondary safety diagnosis organizations to directly verify qualitative indicators, such as the degree of corrosion of rebars and the condition of exterior walls, in the field.

In addition, it is planned to treat workplaces with delayed on-site investigation as failing to complete safety diagnosis.

The responsibility of the 2nd safety diagnosis advisory committee is also strengthened.

This is because the advisory committee was held with the final scores for deciding whether to rebuild or not, and the committee members were not responsible.

In the future, the advisory committee will deliberate on structural safety and aging of buildings and facilities individually and separately for each evaluation field, and the total score will be closed.

(Photo = Yonhap News)