The Liberal Democratic Party has acknowledged that there was some behavior in which participants held tips in their mouths at social gatherings for young members of parliament where scantily clad female dancers were invited, but that there was no expenditure from political party grants. We compiled a report and presented it to the opposition parties.
The Liberal Democratic Party has released a report compiled from interviews with related parties regarding the invitation of a female dancer who exposed a lot of her body to a social gathering of the Youth Affairs Bureau's Kinki Block Conference held in Wakayama City last November. , presented to the Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan.
According to this report, 50 people from the Kinki bloc's Youth Bureau attended the social gathering, and two people from the party headquarters, the former Youth Bureau chief and the acting Youth Bureau director, both of whom had resigned, were in attendance.
It is said that the dancer entertainment was planned by the youth director of the Wakayama Prefectural Federation at the time, who left the party, by himself, and the content was not disclosed to the participants or party headquarters in advance. As for the reason, she said, ``She wanted it to be a surprise.''
On the day of the event, the dancers dance near the stage and tables wearing revealing swimsuit-like costumes, and when participants give 1,000 yen bills to the dancers as tips, they either hold them in their mouths or tuck them into their costumes. I believe there was an act.
Additionally, participants complained that the event did not match the purpose of the event, so they announced that the images they had taken would be deleted.
On the other hand, the expenses for the social gathering were covered by the 5,000 yen per person membership fee paid by the participants and the prefectural association's general account, with no expenditures from political party grants.
Regarding this, the Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan pointed out at a board meeting of the House of Councilors Budget Committee on the 22nd that the explanation that public funds were not used for social gatherings was insufficient, and requested that a detailed report be made again.