Fallows, hedges, crop rotation, small farms... Brussels proposed, on Friday March 15, legislative revisions to drastically ease the environmental rules of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), hotly contested by the sector across the European Union (EU).

To the great dismay of environmental NGOs, the European Commission is proposing to relax, or even eliminate, part of the strict "green" criteria that the new CAP (2023-2027), which came into force last year, imposes on farmers respect to receive European payments.

Member states and MEPs should examine these proposals quickly with a view to possibly endorsing them by the end of April.

See also Agricultural anger: what are the farmers demanding?

“The objective is to further reduce the administrative burden, to give farmers and States greater flexibility to comply with certain conditions, without reducing the overall level of environmental ambition,” said the President of the Commission, Ursula von der Leyen.

“It will be possible to apply certain standards in a way that is more compatible with the realities faced by farmers on a daily basis on the ground,” she insisted, after an interview on Friday with Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk.

Thus, farms must currently leave at least 4% of arable land fallow or non-productive areas (hedges, groves, ponds, etc.).

A criterion that has become a scarecrow for farmers demonstrating in the EU.

After granting a temporary suspension for 2023 and then 2024, Brussels is proposing to completely remove the obligation from the legislation, leaving only the ban on trimming hedges during nesting periods.

After granting a temporary suspension for 2023 then 2024, Brussels proposes to completely remove the obligation in the legislation, leaving only the ban on trimming hedges during nesting periods © Nicolas Tucat, AFP/Archives

“It was really difficult for farmers to accept” these fallow obligations, but “they can always choose to do it on a voluntary basis” in exchange for bonuses (“eco-regimes”), explained to AFP the Commissioner of Agriculture, Janusz Wojciechowski.

“In practice, farmers would be encouraged to maintain non-productive areas, but without fearing a loss of income if they cannot do so,” said Ursula von der Leyen.

Also read: Abandoned by consumers, organic is seeking public and political support

Retroactivity

Among the "conditionalities" criticized by agricultural organizations which consider them impractical in the face of climatic hazards: the obligation of crop rotation, with a crop different from the previous year on 35% of arable land.

It could be replaced by simple “diversification”.

For the ban on bare floors during sensitive periods, "the idea would be that these periods are not rigid, that the state can define them flexibly taking into account regional differences", underlined Janusz Wojciechowski.

European Commissioner for Agriculture Janusz Wojciechowski presents new proposals for farmers during a briefing at the European Parliament office in Warsaw, on March 15, 2024 in Poland © Sergei GAPON / AFP

“Most of the changes would come into force in 2025, but apply retroactively to January 1, 2024. Farmers would not be penalized for not having respected these conditionalities” this year, he insisted.

Another major change: the Commission is proposing to exempt small farms of less than 10 hectares from controls and penalties linked to environmental conditions – which represent 65% of CAP beneficiaries, but only cover 9.6% of the surface area.

“In Poland, they represent three quarters of all farms,” notes Janusz Wojciechowski.

Also read “Another communication stunt!”

: Macron heckled at the opening of the Agricultural Show

"Scandalous"

Finally, States would have until the end of 2025 to translate into their national plans the updating over time of European environmental and climate legislation.

And in the event of extreme climatic episodes (drought, floods, etc.) preventing farmers from complying with the requirements of the CAP, States would be free to introduce temporary exemptions, reserved for the operators concerned so that they do not incur penalty.

Farmers' demonstration in Brussels, February 26, 2024 © BENOIT DOPPAGNE / BELGA/AFP/Archives

“It is scandalous to want to carry out legislative weakening of the CAP as part of an accelerated procedure without an impact study, under the cover of administrative simplification”, compromising “the necessary adaptation to climate change”, reacted the MEP Green Martin Hausling.

Environmental NGOs denounce an "electoralist" dismantling of the green architecture of the CAP, with no guarantee of defusing the agricultural malaise.

“Blindly abandoning environmental measures will not appease farmers who are suffering from unfair prices and the climate emergency, with long-term sustainability needs,” argues Anu Suono of WWF.

Concerns brushed aside by Brussels: "This development will in no way weaken the environmental aspect, we obtain more results with encouragements and bonuses, than with constraints" and penalties, believes Janusz Wojciechowski, calling for "take the farmers seriously".

At the same time, the Commission presented on Friday ways to better "protect farmers from unfair practices" in the agri-food industry, before discussions with sector players and with States to develop "short and medium term" actions.

With AFP

The France 24 summary of the week

invites you to look back at the news that marked the week

I subscribe

Take international news everywhere with you!

Download the France 24 application