“I think it is clear at this stage that the amendments (...) have been rejected,” Prime Minister Leo Varadkar, whose center-right government had proposed the reform, announced to the press on Saturday March 9.

"It was our responsibility to convince a majority of people to vote 'yes' and we failed to do so," he added, while the results of the referendum, the wording of which had been widely criticized, did not have not yet been officially released.

A symbolic blow for women, and contrary to a political class whose main parties had defended the "yes", Irish voters thus disapproved a modification of the Constitution which notably intended to broaden the concept of family beyond the notion of marriage, and erasing the priority role of mothers in ensuring “domestic duties” in a home.

But this referendum aroused little enthusiasm, with participation which did not exceed 50% in most of the 39 constituencies, according to estimates published by the Irish media.

Even before the Prime Minister spoke, several other members of the government had already conceded defeat, the Minister for Equality, Roderic O'Gorman, quoted by the Irish Times, saying he was disappointed and regretted that the people "did not see the urgency for change" of the Constitution.

“Sad day”

Ireland, a European Union country with 5.3 million inhabitants, legalized marriage for same-sex couples in 2015, and abortion in 2018.

The government was counting on this double referendum, organized on March 8, International Women's Rights Day and at a time when France ratified the inclusion of the right to abortion in its own Constitution, to further erase the mark left by the Catholic Church in the country's institutions.

“It’s a sad day for those who have been campaigning for decades to get rid of these sexist words” in the Constitution, Labor Senator Marie Sherlock responded on RTE radio.

"The people have spoken. They have made their voice heard and must be heard. The government's proposals have failed," said the leader of Sinn Fein, Mary Lou McDonald, a 'yes' supporter, accusing the executive for not having consulted sufficiently upstream on the proposed reform.

“It’s a significant victory for the people against the political establishment,” Peadar Toibin, leader of the conservative Aontu party, who supported the “no” vote, told AFP.

"The government had defended these amendments as if they were progressive (...) but in reality they were not", in particular with regard to their repercussions on the care owed to the most fragile in society, a- he added.

Vague wordings

Until a few days before the election, polls predicted a fairly easy 'yes' victory, but the latest polls had revealed growing uncertainty.

Posters for “no” in Dublin, March 5, 2024, before the referendum on the modernization of the Irish Constitution on women and the family © Paul Faith, AFP

Voters had to decide on two questions.

The first concerned the definition of family, proposing to expand it beyond that based on marriage, to also include "lasting relationships" such as cohabiting couples and their children.

The second question proposed erasing a reference deemed outdated on the role of women in the home, which suggests that they have a duty to take care of other people under their roof.

A new, broader formula would have made all members of a family responsible for caring for each other.

Posters for “yes” in Dublin, March 5, 2024, before the referendum on the modernization of the Irish Constitution on women and the family © Paul Faith, AFP

Opponents of these changes had criticized vague wording, particularly on the second question, and the disappearance of the words "woman" and "mother" from the text.

Activists for the rights of disabled people also accused the text of disempowering the State in terms of the care and support of these people.

With AFP

The France 24 summary of the week

invites you to look back at the news that marked the week

I subscribe

Take international news everywhere with you!

Download the France 24 application