• Casa Real Carlos III receives King Felipe VI at his residence at Clarence House in London

  • Monarchies Isabel II and Don Juan Carlos: confidences, protection and carousing with their beloved "cousin Lilibet"

  • Royal Family Felipe VI and Juan Carlos I: the keys to their 'entente cordiale' to mourn Isabel II together

On the eve of the premiere of the Netflix docuseries with Prince Harry and his wife Meghan as protagonists, in the United Kingdom it was enough to look at the front pages of the newspapers to see that

the consensus was almost unanimous that the couple was doing enormous damage to the Monarchy

.

The second son of Carlos III and his wife continue their crazy and lucrative flight forward with explosive statements that, among other things,

identify the institution with a structural racism that would continue today

.

The echo that this plot line -which the couple began to pull last year in their famous interview with Oprah Winfrey- has had throughout America,

especially in the United States and in the kingdoms that the Windsors maintain in the Caribbean

, has been extraordinary, dangerously lowering the popularity of the Monarchy on the other side of the pond.

In this context, even before the documentary was released, politicians and parliamentarians in the United Kingdom spoke out vehemently.

Conservative MP Robert Seely

, sitting in the House of Commons for the Isle of Wight, accused Harry and Meghan of "tearing apart" the Monarchy.

At the same time, his co-religionist Tim Loughton wanted to make it clear that he felt "ashamed that this deeply shameful couple bear

the title of our great county" in reference to the Duchy of Sussex

.

They were not the only voices of leaders who entered the debate.

But the furthest he dared to go was Tory MP Bob Seely, who proposed that Parliament

debate an amendment to the Securities Deprivation Act of 1917.

to do something that hasn't been done for over a century, which would be to strip Harry and Meghan of the dukedom.

It does not seem that at the moment

they are going to go ahead with the measure because, on the one hand, Buckingham

would be betting on a strategy to reduce tension -there it is understood that, as has been published this week, Palacio's intention continues to

be that of inviting Harry and Meghan to the coronation of Carlos III in May-

;

and, on the other, the Prime Minister himself, Rishi Sunak, ruled out the processing of the proposal.

King Felipe VI and King Carlos III in November 2022GTRES

But the fact that so many British MPs

stormed out and took the issue to the very seat of national sovereignty

makes perfect sense as Their Honors are well aware of

their critical role in protecting and intervening in the necessary updating of the institution.

The United Kingdom boasts of being today one of the 11 parliamentary monarchies that remain in Europe.

If all comparisons are always odious, it is of course

confronting the zeal that Westminster has in addressing legal changes

that affect the core institution on which the entire political system is based with the absolute lack of interest that the Spanish Parliament has shown since its approval. of the Constitution regarding

our Head of State.

It could be said that here the parliamentary Monarchy

is a desideratum since the Courts do not seem to feel concerned about anything that affects or does not affect the Crown.

The prestigious jurist Luis María Cazorla admitted in this newspaper that

"there has been a normative neglect on the Crown these four decades."

The legal gaps that afflict the institution are not regulated, nor is there ever the impulse and will to face legal situations today as unacceptable as that our

Constitution maintains the prevalence of men over women in the succession order.

Returning to Harry and Meghan, in the United Kingdom the granting of royal titles is the prerogative of the sovereign,

just as our Magna Carta recognizes the King in Spain.

And, thus, on the occasion of their wedding in May 2018, Elizabeth II

granted Charles's second son and his wife the titles of Dukes of Sussex,

Earls of Dumbarton and Barons Kilkeel -in Meghan's case as consort-.

Felipe VI greeting Queen Camilla and Carlos III greeting Queen LetiziaGTRES

But in Great Britain

the monarch cannot get up early in the morning and take from anyone what he has given

.

It is a power in which Parliament must intervene.

Hence, the couple in question is not in this sense of danger as long as Westminster does not see fit to amend the Title Deprivation Act of 1917. The same thing happens to Prince Andrew, who despite being ousted for his

alleged sexual abuse scandal , remains Duke of York.

Another deputy, the Labor Rachael Maskell, is trying to get the House of Commons to address the legal reform to leave the third son of Elizabeth II without a title.

Just like in Spain, where article 62.f attributes to the King the power to

"grant honors and distinctions in accordance with the laws."

As Parliament has never been interested in developing it, Felipe VI, without going any further, began his reign

by stripping his sister, the Infanta Cristina, of the title of Duchess of Palma

without the intervention of any other State power.

And that there was no shortage of doubts from jurists about whether the decision complied with the law.

The aforementioned succession issue is bloody.

Princess Leonor will come of age in 2023 and will swear before the Courts as

her heir.

But Spain maintains the semi-salic principle that gives prevalence to the male

.

With the announcement of Doña Letizia's second pregnancy, the irresponsible deputies and senators

limited themselves to crossing their fingers so that another girl would be born

and leave the brown of the legislative change to future generations.

Carlos III and Felipe VI in November 2022GTRES

Nothing to do with the UK.

In December 2012, William and Catherine, Dukes of Cambridge, announced that they were expecting their first child – which, remember, would be a boy.

The British Parliament took zero seconds to undertake the legal reform to end the

shameful

discrimination based on sex in the inheritance order.

And no one believes that it was easy.

Since the British king is the head of state of 15 other nations -including Canada, Australia or New Zealand-,

the then Prime Minister David Cameron had to promote the corresponding legislative reform

with his Commonwealth partners and the measure had to be debated and approved in up to 16 parliaments.

The same can be said of a key issue such as the regency.

As soon as

Charles III assumed the throne in September, Westminster

set to work to amend the Regency Acts with the aim of being able to appoint, as has just happened, Princes Edward and Anne as State Councilors so that, along with others who They were like

Queen Camilla or Prince William, they can assume regency functions.

It is that when the king travels abroad or is temporarily prevented, for example due to illness, there is no such thing as a vacant throne.

In Spain, the regency is another of the serious legal holes that affect the Crown.

There is nothing left

but to pray to the god that you want so that Don Felipe maintains his good health.

Because, in the event that the Head of State is prevented from exercising his functions, we lack an immediate regency mechanism.

This was noted with concern with the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic.

But, have our forefathers said or done anything?

Unclear.

This is Spain, not the United Kingdom, where Parliament cares a lot about the parliamentary Monarchy.

According to the criteria of The Trust Project

Know more