Giant four-way deal on the brink of midnight.

This Monday,

Coreper

, the ambassadors of the 27 EU, have reached an understanding against all odds to unlock four fundamental issues that had been stuck for months, largely due to

Hungary's veto.

With the agreement reached, the EU gives the green light to a package of

macro-financial aid

to Ukraine worth

18,000 million euros

and also agrees on a minimum rate of 15% for

Corporate Tax

with which to tax multinationals.

At the same time, the Council will give its approval to the National Recovery Plan of Hungary, which will allow the Government of Viktor Orban to opt for 5,800 million euros in transfers or, at least, not to lose them permanently.

And all the parties have also found the meeting point to freeze, for the first time in history,

6,300 million in Cohesion Funds

awarded to Budapest, which will be left without them at least temporarily due to its repeated violations of community regulations.

The agreement was reached after the Ecofin was unable to resolve the issue last week, hours after a meeting today of the 27 foreign ministers in Brussels and just two days before the holding of a European Council with the heads of state and government.

"Mega-agreement" The EU ambassadors agree in principle to a package of 18,000 million in support of Ukraine, a minimum 15% tax for large corporations, approval of the Recovery Plan for Hungary and an agreement on conditionality.

The package will be confirmed by written procedure" on Wednesday, confirmed the Czech Presidency, which this semester is in charge of the Council and the negotiations.

The Netherlands has abstained

and the question remains as to whether

Poland

It will not cause problems with the minimum rate, since it has its own troubles with Brussels and has practiced similar tactics.

"Coreper has found the qualified majority necessary to impose measures for the protection of the Union budget against the consequences of infringements of the principles of the rule of law in Hungary, in relation to public procurement, the effectiveness of procedural action and the fight against corruption. The budgetary impact of this suspension amounts to approximately

6,300 million"

, says the consensual text.

The pact stipulates that funds are frozen, but less than those proposed in September by the Commission.

Ursula von der Leyen's team and the Budget Commissioner,

Johannes Hahn,

they suggested freezing up to 65% of three programs.

The rules say that it is not enough for a country to commit irregularities.

In order for there to be a financial sanction of this type, there must be violations that, in addition, compromise public resources of the Union.

That is why it focused on three programs and that amount.

The ambassadors, however, have reduced the total to 55% of these three programs, considering that since the cut-off date Budapest has made progress, improvements, and that the legislative reforms correct some deficiencies.

Despite the fact that on Friday afternoon the Commission reiterated the evaluation and said that the proposed amount, 7,500 million, was fair and proportional.

The new total remains somewhat above 6,000 million euros, almost the same as the country will receive in

Next Generation Funds

if it complies with the reforms, investments and the 27 super-milestones that it has committed to in writing.

And that they are an essential procedure for any disbursement, as in other countries.

"Given that the remedial measures taken so far by Hungary are affected by significant deficiencies that seriously compromise their suitability to deal with the infringements of the principles of the rule of law identified by the Commission in its proposal, the Council considers that the consequent risk for the Union budget remains high. However, in light of the number and importance of corrective measures that Hungary has successfully implemented and given the degree of cooperation, it would be a reasonable approximation" to set the remaining risk for the budget at 55% of the commitments of the programs", say the 27.

For months Hungary has had the upper hand, more or less.

The European Commission had stopped its Recovery Plan, the only one in the entire EU that had not been approved.

The main reason is that it is European money and the regulation requires that there be guarantees that it will be well used and that the beneficiary country has the legal and institutional mechanisms to guarantee it.

And Hungary, with the executive partly dominating the judiciary, and no independent audit and verification bodies, did not fit the bill.

Since the summer of 2021 there has been tension, discussions, but no progress.

Brussels expected changes and reforms in Hungary, which also had to comply with several sentences of the Court of Justice of the Union, but they did not arrive.

So everything was at

an impasse.

conditionality mechanism

The problem is that two things were happening simultaneously.

On the one hand, the EU was launching, for the first time, the Conditionality Mechanism, a new instrument that the CJEU endorsed this year and that allows the Cohesion Funds of a country that violates the rules to be frozen and puts the Rule of Law and the Community Budget.

On the other, that

Budapest responded with blockades, vetoes and stones

in the wheels of the community gear.

Specifically, in recent months Hungary has stopped two initiatives that had nothing to do with its problem: those 18,000 million euros that Ukraine desperately needs and the minimum rate of 15% for multinationals in an international initiative within the framework of the OECD .

It was blackmail, extortion, out of the book.

Hungary was pressing where it did the most damage, and the Ukrainian question is now, along with energy, the main priority of the Union.

Budapest has not blinked, especially because it is the government closest to Moscow and because, in addition, it has historically had problems with Ukraine over the rights of the country's Magyar minority, which it considers are not respected.

The fiscal question was an addition.

Until now.

Seeing that the path to consensus was closed, the EU had recently decided on a Plan B, which consisted of helping Kiev in the same way that Greece was

rescued

the first time, with loans or bilateral assistance from all members.

The tax issue did not go away, but it was less of a priority.

All this together with the fact that the deadline established in the regulations expires on the 19th, and that if Hungary had not approved its Recovery Plan by then, it risked losing up to 70% of those funds, has been decisive.

The pan was no longer by the handle and was beginning to burn.


According to the criteria of The Trust Project

Know more

  • Hungary

  • Ukraine

  • Greece

  • European Comission

  • Ursula von der Leyen

  • Poland

  • Holland

  • Victor Orbán