• Royals Harry and Meghan: the millions they earn for being victims

  • Royals Prince Harry says he moved to the US to 'break the cycle' of family 'pain and suffering'

With the

explosive interview that Diana of Wales gave to the BBC in 1995

, the one that caused an unprecedented earthquake in the British Monarchy with statements such as that in her marriage there had always been "three", the people's princess intended, first of all, that Charles of England would never reign.

Blinded with hatred

, and behind an angelic face and a

victimizing attitude

that in her day earned her the empathy of a large majority of Britons and global public opinion,

Diana spared no energy in taking revenge on her husband

, whom she would divorce for a year. after.

Although much later the BBC had to apologize and pay large compensation for admitting that it had falsified documents and deceived the princess to get the interview,

Max Hastings

, then editor of the

Daily Telegraph,

was the one who revealed in 2020 that

Diana's obsession

before each of his interlocutors was that

the Prince of Wales not be crowned.

Today it seems that his second son, Prince Harry, has a similar objective, but in this case with

his brother Guillermo as the main victim.

Because the

crazy and highly profitable race to nowhere

in which Harry and his wife Meghan are immersed is

damaging the image of the Crown

in a way that mows the grass under the feet of the future sovereign, while

undermining the ground of Carlos III at the beginning of his reign.

Time was the great ally of the Windsors so that many citizens understood to what extent Diana's story was a forgery.

And it remains to be seen whether or not what Harry and Meghan are transmitting now.

But they no longer have a way back, once their

war against the Monarchy

has begun .

To know more

royals.

Harry and Meghan's 'decalogue' that shakes Buckingham Palace

  • Writing: CARLOS FRESNEDA (Correspondent) London

Harry and Meghan's 'decalogue' that shakes Buckingham Palace

The first three chapters of his highly anticipated Netflix docuseries, released to huge hype around the globe, have not contained atomic bombs.

But all the steps of the Dukes of Sussex, wrapped in a

nauseating role of victimization

, are propping up one of the main ideas that today can erode the institution the most, that of suffering from

structural racism.

The accusation, because it comes from precisely who it comes from, has permeated both the United States

and the entire American continent in which, do not forget, the Windsors continue to lead nations like Jamaica in which the republican ardor has been fanned to cut the ties with the Monarchy and overcome reignited stigmas of the colonial past.

And in the United Kingdom itself, where published opinion has closed ranks around its dynasty and poured out snakes and toads against the profiteering dukes, one sees a

royal family on the defensive

.

In this key, without going any further, the speed and forcefulness with which Buckingham cut off the head days ago of the octogenarian

Lady Susan Hussey

-a lady-in-waiting for decades to Elizabeth II and one of Prince William's godmothers- has been interpreted, for his conversation with the director of an NGO that seemed to exude a

racist stench

and that, however, when carefully analyzed in its literalness and in the context in which it occurred, it does not seem that it was so except for those who already had the inclination to organize the scandalous

But today

the royal family is on target for the insidious story of Harry and Meghan

, who are winning the first battle, and from Carlos III down they all have to make an extra effort to seem like the most tolerant, inclusive and politically correct dynasty on the planet.

Netflix has broadcast the first three chapters of the controversial series.GTRES

Tuesday was the day the Sussexes struck with their longest-range missiles - not counting the nukes they used in a March 2021 interview with Oprah Winfrey.

Harry and Meghan collected an award in New York

that many wonder if they would have dared to accept during the life of Elizabeth II: the Ripple of Hope award, awarded by the Robert F. Kennedy charity.

Its promoter,

Kerry Kennedy

, famous human rights activist and daughter of the well-known senator,

had justified the trophy in question in the "heroism"

- that's nothing - of the dukes for their

courage in questioning their relatives for their structural racism.

Harry and Meghan, like two shining stars, let themselves be loved and participate in the campaign that paints the Monarchy as anachronistic, useless and totally expendable in the 21st century.

And do not forget that

neither Harry nor Meghan have refused their noble titles

nor has the son of Carlos III renounced his rights to the throne.

The first chapters of the Netflix series

contribute

to this

rancid and even ridiculous image of the Crown

without the need for the moment to tell more family intimacies than are just and necessary.

Harry and Meghan with Kerry Kennedy at the gala in which they received an award for denouncing the structural racism of their family. GTRES

In this sense, the

little jokes that the prince lets loose

, such as when he is funny recounting how embarrassed he felt having to ask the then actress if she

knew how to bow

and explaining that he himself was bowing down to his grandmother, connect very well with the sector of the public that sees the monarchy as a medieval residue with no concrete use.

It is not surprising, therefore, that, according to some British media, there are already

Westminster MPs moving to have the couple's ducal title removed.

The

vulgarization of the Crown

, its conversion into a pop fetish stripping it of its highly political nature or the mockery of its members - direct allusions to Princess

Michael of Kent

or indirect ones like the one intuited towards William himself when Harry talks about that "for many members of the Royal House, especially men, there may be a temptation or impulse to marry someone who fits the mold rather than someone you may be destined to be with" - are some of the consequences of a

war waged by the Sussexes

in which

it is not known what they can gain, beyond a lot of money

, and in which Buckingham's writers will have to work really hard, as in past crises including Diana's, if they don't want to lose.

According to the criteria of The Trust Project

Know more

  • King Charles III of England

  • Prince Guillermo

  • United Kingdom

  • Meghan Markle

  • prince harry

  • Articles Eduardo Alvarez