This time, the warning comes after the judge neglected to document a temporary sole custody order.

The decision was read out at a meeting for oral preparation, but no written documentation was made.

In another custody case, the judge failed to make certain decisions and maintain minutes from the meeting for oral preparation, it appears in the decision from the State's Responsibility Board.

High workload

The judge agrees with the facts but has denied responsibility for misconduct.

According to the judge, it is an excessive workload at the district court that is behind the shortcomings.

In his statement, he writes: "With a humane workload, I could have completed the rote work in a reasonable time and then probably also discovered that the protocol had not been processed."