The Sudanese Communist Party and the Alliance for Radical Change affirmed their rejection of the decision of the Forces for Freedom and Change (the wing of the Central Council) to sign a framework agreement with the military component to end what they called the coup. Conspiracy" aimed at blocking the road to the revolution.
The Forces for Freedom and Change, the wing of the Central Council, confirmed that it was working to reach a framework agreement with the army, saying that it had agreed to keep the cabinet fully civilian, and stressing that it would not sign a final agreement without the approval of all the revolutionary forces.
The head of the Transitional Sovereignty Council, Lieutenant General Abdel Fattah Al-Burhan, said 3 days ago that the Council had "understandings" with the Forces for Freedom and Change.
Karrar believed that the settlement that is being marketed is an attempt to produce the same partnership and the same political crisis, and that the forces that presented it want to legalize the existence of what he called the military coup, stressing the no-goes raised by the revolutionary forces, "no negotiation, no partnership, no legitimacy with the military," explaining that the only way To solve the crisis and not produce "Sudan military rule" is the victory of the revolution as it triumphed over former President Omar Hassan al-Bashir.
Some Sudanese parties believe that the framework agreement announced by the Forces for Freedom and Change, the wing of the Central Council, will not be crowned with success in light of the exclusion of other parties, which was explained by the researcher at the Higher Academy for Security and Strategic Studies, Major General Moatasem Abdel Qader Al-Hassan, who spoke about the need to respond to the demands of the Sudanese street and accept With the participation of others in Sudanese political life.
There are challenges facing those presenting a roadmap for resolving the political crisis, represented - according to Major General al-Hassan - in the real problems of the Sudanese, in terms of livelihood, security, and others related to development, and these require non-trusteeship and the confiscation of the right of other civil parties to negotiate and consult.
A comprehensive agreement, not a settlement
For its part, the Forces for Freedom and Change - the Central Council defends the vision it presented, and says, through the words of its leader, Dr. Muhammad al-Mahdi Hassan, that the matter is not related to a settlement, but to a "comprehensive agreement" for all issues and for all parties that believe in democratic transition, and it is not just an agreement between forces Freedom, change and the military component.
Al-Mahdi Hassan also revealed - in his interview with the "Beyond the News" program - about communication between the forces of freedom and change with the revolutionary forces, which he said would accept the framework agreement, and that entrenchment over issues and positions only complicates the political crisis ravaging the country.
The Alliance of Forces for Freedom and Change revealed - in a press conference - that the framework agreement to end what it called the coup, and the formation of a full civilian government will be signed with the military component in power within 10 days, and that a detailed agreement in this regard will be signed after about a month.
The coalition added that a second phase of the talks would deal with transitional justice and other issues.
Reuters quoted 3 sources in the Forces for Freedom and Change as saying that the second phase of the talks will touch on 4 issues: transitional justice, the dismantling of Omar al-Bashir's regime, security sector reform, and the Juba Peace Agreement.
Since October 25, 2021, Sudan has been witnessing protests calling for full civil rule and rejecting exceptional measures imposed by the army commander, Lieutenant General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, most notably the declaration of a state of emergency and the dissolution of the Sovereignty Council and the transitional ministers.