Are you going to approve some accounts with an 11% rise in spending and "progress"? What we have to do is direct spending to what we really need, reduce political spending.
I do believe that it is necessary to spend on Health and Education, we are willing to spend on improvements, but that a reduction in unproductive spending is also undertaken, closing beach bars.
For example, in those aspects that are not fundamental as the Presidency. What superfluous expenses have you detected in that Budget?
The truth is that today they have published some budgets that do not coincide with the draft that we were seeing, they have modified things in these 20 days, but we want a clear gesture of reducing political spending and taxes, because until now it is only a deflation that does not even match with the losses.
An average Madrid family has accumulated a tax increase of 800 euros and they are only compensated 189. Something must be done so that families recover their purchasing power and we are not doing it because now the PP says that it is a social democrat. It says that they have changed the draft, what changes have you found? They presented us with some budgets with parameters that were not realistic, like those of Sánchez, because already in this last quarter we entered a recession.
If families and the self-employed are making sacrifices, we politicians cannot be at a spending party.
We have to review the size and spending also in the regional parliaments, we are still waiting for the deputies to be reduced by half. Are these Ayuso bills a spending party for you? I think they do not take into account the reality of Madrileños,
I would like them to have reflected a reduction in political spending.
This is what we will start trading now. Is that your red line?
I don't like to talk about red lines, those the Government has to have with the people of Madrid, not with us.
The red line has to be that if everyone is sacrificing, so is the government.
If all families reduce spending, the Government has to do it in non-essential things.
We speak without complexes of lowering taxes, it seems that the PP is afraid of it because they say that they are now social democrats.
The red line has to be that if everyone is sacrificing, so is the government.
If all families reduce spending, the Government has to do it in non-essential things.
We speak without complexes of lowering taxes, it seems that the PP is afraid of it because they say that they are now social democrats.
The red line has to be that if everyone is sacrificing, so is the government.
If all families reduce spending, the Government has to do it in non-essential things.
We speak without complexes of lowering taxes, it seems that the PP is afraid of it because they say that they are now social democrats.
In these accounts there are reductions in personal income tax, inheritance, a deflation... do they seem insufficient to you? I think that in this budget there is not much reduction, deflating is not lowering taxes. If these taxes are lowered more, it seems difficult to increase expenses in the items when the majority of income comes from the regional financing fund.
With the reduction of political spending, you take out to lower taxes.
If you have money to increase spending on the Presidency or for projects on the 2030 agenda, you can lower taxes.
Vox has all the will to draw up some budgets, it is necessary, but I hope that the Government has understood where it has to be and I want to see it reflected in the budgets.
It has to answer to its voters and be consistent in doing what it says, for example with the trans law.
You cannot be saying that you think Irene Montero's law is bad and have a more aggressive one. You attribute this to a question of cultural war with the left, but we are talking about citizens who have suffered for years in many cases. It is a matter of political credibility, not you can have a speech and do the opposite.
If Mrs. Ayuso says that gender self-determination and hormones in children are causing pain to families and minors, why does she uphold that law?
Without consistency, voters stop believing in politicians.
And, in this case, in addition, it is about protecting children because we are already seeing doctors, endocrinologists and pediatricians say that this is a fad and they are getting children who ask to start a hormonal process and regret it.
Do you have proof of any specific case? I just received one on the mobile of a mother who is having a very bad time and yesterday another just like it from someone who didn't even vote for us, he voted for Podemos.
Look, that 15-year-old boy had a trans friend, he decided that he wanted to be like her and he wanted to start the process.
They decided to go to the psychiatrist with him and the diagnosis is that he was gay and had suffered bullying, now he is happy without having gone through treatment. Are they denying that there are trans children? Of course there are trans children and before the law there were , but this gives the option of taking hormones at a very early stage and in many cases there is not the maturity to know if you are really convinced to take that step, which has no easy way back.
The issue of the trans law is an issue of values and I want to know where the PP is.
In gender self-determination?
Now it turns out that women have no identity and all our struggle is erased from the map.
It is that even in the PSOE some are talking about this, I want to know what ideas Mrs. Díaz defends.
On the first day of reopening of the 80 24-hour health centers in Madrid, there has been a 60% drop in doctors. You can have many spaces, but if you lack professionals, they are of no use to you.
Here there has been a precariousness of the toilets and health is nothing without them.
Madrid's healthcare is not the merit of politicians, it shocks me to hear them say that we have the best in the world.
If the politician is erased from the map, Madrid's health system would be just as extraordinary for its doctors, nurses and guards.
You have to take care of them and pay them well, allow them to reconcile with their family and not feel mistreated. For that, we also need a remnant that comes from taxes. If we reduce political spending, we will have to dedicate to Health.
You have to spend on health,
Education and Social Emergency and reduce superfluous expenses in the Presidency and bike lanes. It seems that its main obstacle in the Budgets is the Ministry of the Presidency. The problem I see is political spending, as in general in Spain, understanding that we cannot continue spending thus, we are not a rich country and we need resources for what is fundamental.
And if we dedicate ourselves to paying 22 million to the unions, we won't have enough for other important things.
I prefer, instead of paying the unions, to pay doctors, teachers or make emergency contingency plans better. They are different items and the same thing will happen with people who do not want to pay their salary or that of their deputies in that case It is necessary to reduce by half those of my party too, of course.
I have proposed it.
And what happened?
That the PP has not even convened the Commission for that to be voted on. Are you in favor of studying what happened in the residences during the pandemic? Having seen the embarrassing and childish spectacle of the left and the PP shouting in plenary, I think that it leads to nothing.
The Tik Tok videos of Mrs. Ayuso and Mrs. García do not improve the lives of the people of Madrid, they can entertain them for a while, but they will not improve their housing and their economic capacity. Was it a blunder to reactivate your commission?
Or was it a measure of pressure on the regional government? You could say it was an illusion, I thought that in the Assembly we had politicians with the necessary maturity to put the welfare of the elderly ahead of their children's discussions. the doubt of interference from Genoa to agree Budgets,
Does this year with the new leadership maintain it? We just want to know where the PP is in the Trans Law, in the Democratic Memory Law, in the tax cuts, in the indoctrination in Education... The only thing I ask is that speak up because we want to know what ideas you stand for.
Mrs. Ayuso is not a deputy of Congress to always oppose Sánchez, she has a budget of 25 billion to do what she wants and govern this community, not just continually say that she is against Sánchez.
That it remove the subsidies to the unions, repeal the trans law and lower taxes, all your competences. It is you who has been supporting that government for four years. That is why I try to make you do all these things, we have always been a loyal partner.
Before, with Citizens,
They told us that they couldn't repeal the Trans Law because Mr. Aguado wouldn't let them, but they wanted to. Is the ghost of Mr. Aguado still there?
I don't think so.
When more taxes had to be lowered, they couldn't because Ciudadanos wouldn't let them lower more.
We want tax cuts, why don't they do it?
Is Madrid a more insecure region than a few years ago?
Of course it does, everyone sees it in San Blas, Coslada or Fuenlabrada and it is not worth denying the obvious.
Madrid is safer than other cities in the world, but for a year and a half it has been less safe and there is a part that is due to the lack of control of illegal immigration.
Whoever comes to work legally is a blessing for Spain, we need people in sectors such as construction.
But there are people who want to be in our neighborhoods living on subsidies and generating insecurity. Immigration is similar in figures these years and, according to the INE, three out of four crimes are committed by people of Spanish nationality. The data from the Prosecutor's Office are very clear, a third of the crimes are committed by 10% of the population who are immigrants.
Can we not say that illegal immigration commits more crimes than nationals? That interpretation is not true, the data on foreigners are not only those who live in our country. I am talking about nationalized citizens, a third of the crimes are committed by 10% the population, there is a problem. You defended in the last budgets an agreement for the closure of the Batán ore center and a year later it remains open. I remember when I went to Morocco, to the Rif, and the families told me that they saved to take their the children from there who did not do the military service at 17 years of age.
It is terrible to separate children from their families and for them to pay the mafias because those who arrive in Spain end up in these centers where the mafias continue to control them, they threaten to harm their families, they end up supplying them with drugs,
they organize them into groups and pay them to perform.
This is the reality, even the attendees tell you.
These children must return to their parents until they are of legal age and can come legally. We are talking about returning many minors to countries in conflict They have the possibility of coming legally, Spain is not a racist country, we welcome everyone the world that comes to work and here there is work in hospitality, construction... We cannot give the wrong message that here those who come illegally are rewarded, it is unfair for those who comply with all laws.
Those who come legally must get their papers done as quickly as possible and get to work, and those who don't want to come to work and integrate are better off not coming.
What we cannot do is submit our values to others who come to impose theirs on us, which are not ours.
Here equality between men and women is defended, no one is discriminated against because of their sexual orientation and things are done with legal papers. Will Rocío Monasterio be Vox's candidate for the Community of Madrid?
I would love to and I hope so because in Madrid you have to do a lot of work and politics with the whole of Spain in mind.
I do not believe in Madrid nationalism and now more than ever Vox is needed, because we are the only ones with a long-term project. Is that project crumbling with the departure of Macarena Olona and the degradation of Ortega Smith? That would happen in a match personalist, Vox is not that, our party is the only one that defends the ideas of the people who stop us in the street.
This party is not a business of Abascal or Monasterio or Garriga, it is the party of millions of Spaniards who are seeing their ideas reflected in some spokespersons who may be these or others, we are circumstantial.
Vox are not acronyms, it is a project for Spain. Many of the critics, including Olona, have pointed to excessive personalism as the main problem of their party. I think that the proof that Vox is not that is that there are a lot of of people who continue to trust us and have us as the only patriotic and future alternative for Spain.
But when there are people who leave, you have to listen and reflect. Has that reflection been made since Olona left? Of course it has been done, it would be a mistake not to reflect and listen.
But the reality is that what you from the press call a crisis,
we call it one more step of maturity.
And that strengthens the party.
Vox is more cohesive and more convinced that the task is to give Spain a party with enthusiasm and hope to leave behind bipartisanship, which is already outdated in our country.
Conforms to The Trust Project criteria
Know more