The Abu Dhabi Court rejected the case for lack of evidence

A Gulf man accuses his ex-wife of seizing 441 thousand dirhams

The Abu Dhabi Court took the complementary oath to the plaintiff and he failed to appear.

archival

A (Gulf) man accused his ex-wife of seizing 441,000 dirhams, after she had deluded him, before the divorce, into buying real estate for him in her country.

In the details, a man filed a lawsuit against his (Arab) ex-wife, demanding that she pay him 441,000 dirhams and interest at 12.5% ​​and oblige her to pay fees, expenses and fees, explaining that the defendant was his wife and gave her a child, and during the marital relationship he handed her five checks worth 441,000 dirhams. At her request to buy apartments and lands for his benefit in her country, and contrary to the truth, she told him that she had bought apartments and lands in his name and did not provide proof of that, which prompted him to file his case, and attached a document to his claim with copies of checks and pictures of an account statement.

During the consideration of the case, the court decided to direct the complementary oath to the plaintiff in the form (I swear by Almighty God that the checks I handed over to the defendant, which I cashed in the amount of 441 thousand dirhams, were in exchange for an agreement between me and the defendant to buy apartments and lands for my benefit in an Arab country and it was not for another reason, and that it She did not do what was agreed upon, and she did not hand me evidence that she had purchased what was agreed upon for my benefit, whether in my name or in the name of my son, and that the defendant's responsibilities are occupied with me with the amount claimed, and God is a witness to what I say), and a session was scheduled to take the oath, but the plaintiff failed to attend .

The court stated that it is stipulated in the first article of the Evidence Law that the plaintiff must prove his right and the defendant may deny it, noting that it directed the complementary oath to the plaintiff and failed to appear on time, and the case papers were devoid of complete evidence of the validity of what he claims, and the court ruled to reject the case In her condition and obligated the plaintiff to pay expenses and fees. 

Follow our latest local and sports news and the latest political and economic developments via Google news