The Abu Dhabi Court obligated him to return the amount and compensation in the amount of 15,000 dirhams

A man borrows 244 thousand dirhams from a woman and delays the payment

The Abu Dhabi Court directed the supplementary oath to the plaintiff, so she took her oath in the specified form.

archival

The Abu Dhabi Family and Civil and Administrative Claims Court ruled that a man must pay a woman close to him an amount of 244,541 dirhams, which he had borrowed from her and delayed repayment, and obligated him to pay her 15,000 dirhams as compensation for material and moral damages.

In the details, a woman filed a lawsuit against her relative, demanding that he pay her 244,541 dirhams, the legal interest at 12%, and 50,000 dirhams in compensation for the damages she sustained, noting that, by virtue of the family relationship between them, she lent the defendant the amount of the claim on To pay it after a while, and he hastened to pay part of the amount, and did not commit to paying the rest of the amount, while the defendant submitted a reply memorandum in which he argued that the case was not accepted for filing a non-qualification, as well as a request to introduce a new opponent, which was rejected by the judge supervising the case.

The court decided to take the complementary oath to the plaintiff, and she took her oath in the form approved by the court.

The court stated in the merits of the ruling that it saw in the messages of the social networking program (WhatsApp) submitted by the plaintiff what constitutes preliminary evidence, but it is not sufficient to form her faith, since these messages do not explain the value of the debt and the treatment that took place between the two parties to the lawsuit, and the court decided to direct the oath Complementary to the plaintiff, and I swore it according to the specified formula, and accordingly, the case has been established before the court, and the defendant’s preoccupation with the amount of 244,541 dirhams in favor of the plaintiff has been proven correct.

Regarding the request for compensation, the court indicated that it concluded that it was proven that the defendant had failed to implement his obligation to fulfill the amount delivered to him, with which there was an error necessitating liability in his right. From a loss, from not benefiting from the aforementioned amount, as well as feeling sad about not fulfilling her right.

While the court rejected the request for legal interest at 5% of the debt’s maturity date, and attributed its refusal to the fact that the two parties to the litigation were non-merchants, and the loan was not for a purpose related to trade, and the court ruled to oblige the defendant to pay the plaintiff an amount of 244 thousand 541 dirhams, and compensation in the amount of 15 thousand dirhams. For all damages, and obligating him to fees and expenses.

• The court rejected the request for legal interest, since the parties to the litigation were non-traders.

Follow our latest local and sports news and the latest political and economic developments via Google news