Abu Dhabi Appeal rejected the case

A young man accuses his friend of evading the payment of 285,000 dirhams of his car installments

The Abu Dhabi Court of Appeal upheld a ruling of the Court of First Instance, which rejected a lawsuit brought by a young man against his friend, demanding that he pay him an amount of 315,000 dirhams, the value of a car he bought for him in his name from the bank, and the latter refused to pay the installments, and the court again rejected the case.

In the details, a young man filed a lawsuit against his friend, demanding that he pay him an amount of 285,700 dirhams, in addition to an amount of 30,000 dirhams in compensation for the damages he sustained. Due to the existence of an impediment preventing the purchase of the car in his name, he responded to his request, and the latter received the vehicle and paid three instalments, then offered him to exchange the new car and his car, and paid the defendant 100,000 dirhams the price difference, provided that the defendant bears the monthly installments in the amount of 6954 dirhams, and after The completion of the exchange refused to pay the rest of the installments, which caused him material and moral damages.

The court of first instance decided to reject the case on the grounds that he had not provided evidence of what the plaintiff was claiming against the defendant, and he had not provided evidence of the exchange between the two vehicles and the latter’s possession of the vehicle, which was void of a document supporting it, which required its refusal based on the decision in Article One. of the law of evidence.

The young man was not satisfied with the verdict, and he lodged his appeal, demanding that the appealed ruling be rescinded, and that the court again appeals to him with his requests before the first instance, and to hear his witness regarding the incident of litigation. The indication of what the latter decided that he returned the car to him, which is an implicit acknowledgment of their exchange.

The Court of Appeal stated that the evidence provided by the young man was that the two vehicles of the association were licensed in his name, according to the evidence in their licenses, and he did not prove his claim that he and his friend had previously agreed on an exchange, and also his argument lacked evidence that he had paid 100,000 dirhams to the appellant in exchange for their exchange of the two cars. Advice to accept the appeal in form, to cancel the appealed judgment and to again reject the appealed case in its case, and the appellant incurred the expenses.

Follow our latest local and sports news and the latest political and economic developments via Google news