The Grand Chamber, supreme formation of the European jurisdiction, will deliver its decision at 11:00 a.m. (09:00 GMT), one year after the hearing which was held at the end of September 2021.

The Court had been seized by two French couples who had unsuccessfully asked the French authorities for the repatriation of their daughters, two young women companions of jihadists, and their three children.

The four applicants maintain that this refusal violates several articles of the European Convention on Human Rights, a text that the ECHR is responsible for enforcing, in particular by exposing their daughters and grandchildren to "inhuman and degrading treatment".

The two women had left France in 2014 and 2015 to join Syria where they gave birth to two children for one, one for the other.

Now aged 31 and 33, they have been held with them since the beginning of 2019 in the Al-Hol and Roj camps in northeastern Syria.

"Last bastion"

Asked by AFP, the father of one of them, who wishes to remain anonymous, said he was "reasonably optimistic" about a condemnation from France.

"We are waiting for the recognition of the law. That they be repatriated and judged (in France) for what they have done".

If the ECHR does not condemn France, "that will mean (that Paris) has the right to keep children in a war zone (...) because their parents have made the wrong choices", estimated Me Marie Dosé, one of the family lawyers.

She calls not to "blow up the last bastion that is the child and the innocence of the child".

#photo1

The decision of the judicial arm of the Council of Europe will be scrutinized well beyond France because it also concerns the hundreds of European nationals currently detained in Syria.

Seven member states of the Council (Norway, Denmark, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Belgium, Spain and Sweden) thus intervened in the procedure.

This judgment "goes beyond the Franco-French framework" and "will mark the jurisprudence of the Court", it was estimated with the Defender of Rights, the French ombudsman responsible for the defense of rights, in particular those of children.

An independent administrative authority, the Defender intervened in the procedure before the ECHR and had already questioned the French government on this subject on several occasions since 2019, already considering that it did not take into account the best interests of the child.

In February, Paris was even singled out by the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child, which considered that France had "violated the rights of French children detained in Syria by failing to repatriate them".

"Jurisdiction"

"The central question" of this file is that of "jurisdiction", explains the institution: does France exercise extraterritorial jurisdiction over these mothers and their children in Syria?

It is in any case the first time that the ECHR will consider this question.

It is indeed from this recognition of jurisdiction that stems the obligation of the State to repatriate these children and their mothers, emphasizes the Defender.

Elsewhere in Europe, countries like Germany or Belgium have already recovered most of their jihadists.

For its part, to the great displeasure of families and NGOs, Paris has long favored the "case by case" doctrine defended before the ECHR by its representative.

But in early July, France brought back 35 minors and 16 mothers, the first massive repatriation since the fall in 2019 of the "caliphate" of the Islamic State (IS) group.

Until then, only a few children had been brought back.

#photo2

The mothers, all targeted by a search warrant or French arrest, were indicted and imprisoned, the minors entrusted to the Childhood Social Aid.

According to the coordinator of French intelligence and the fight against terrorism, Laurent Nunez, there remained after this operation a hundred women and nearly 250 French children in camps in Syria.

"Whenever we can, we will carry out repatriation operations," he told AFP in mid-July.

© 2022 AFP